david sims wrote:
> I recently converted two of my boxes over to Debian, and I like the apt system
> so much that I'd like to distribute two of my LGPL Java packages via
> Debian/apt, if possible.
There are two ways to distribute them via APT: Either at your own web site
or as part of Debian itse
david sims wrote:
> I recently converted two of my boxes over to Debian, and I like the apt system
> so much that I'd like to distribute two of my LGPL Java packages via
> Debian/apt, if possible.
There are two ways to distribute them via APT: Either at your own web site
or as part of Debian its
Please take my address *off* the address list for this thread!
I answered a question on debian-ppc from someone who wanted to do
Java development on a PowerPC machine by telling them about the
Blackdown Java Development Kit, prompting Stephane to chime in
about the evils of ``non-free'' software
Please take my address *off* the address list for this thread!
I answered a question on debian-ppc from someone who wanted to do
Java development on a PowerPC machine by telling them about the
Blackdown Java Development Kit, prompting Stephane to chime in
about the evils of ``non-free'' software
I recently converted two of my boxes over to Debian, and I like the apt system
so much that I'd like to distribute two of my LGPL Java packages via
Debian/apt, if possible. They are currently distributed in the usual way via my
web site.
Of course, they both require non-free JVMs and JDKs. One of
Indeed, the main reason I'm lurking here (oops, guess I'm not just
lurking anymore :-) is the hope that I'll notice when we reach the
point of having a sufficient Free(libre) java environment, because
of the rejoicing here... in the meantime (especially as I do more
systems programming for which
> > As a systems software
> > writer you can't choose what to provide, you have to provide what people
> > are using and want.
>
> I am sorry but this is plainly wrong. Debian is running on volunteer time
> and,
> yes, we choose what to provide, and we choose to concentrate on free software.
GN
I recently converted two of my boxes over to Debian, and I like the apt system
so much that I'd like to distribute two of my LGPL Java packages via
Debian/apt, if possible. They are currently distributed in the usual way via my
web site.
Of course, they both require non-free JVMs and JDKs. One of
Indeed, the main reason I'm lurking here (oops, guess I'm not just
lurking anymore :-) is the hope that I'll notice when we reach the
point of having a sufficient Free(libre) java environment, because
of the rejoicing here... in the meantime (especially as I do more
systems programming for which
> > As a systems software
> > writer you can't choose what to provide, you have to provide what people
> > are using and want.
>
> I am sorry but this is plainly wrong. Debian is running on volunteer time and,
> yes, we choose what to provide, and we choose to concentrate on free software.
GNU/
On Saturday 8 July 2000, at 21 h 26,
the keyboard of John Leuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a systems software
> writer you can't choose what to provide, you have to provide what people
> are using and want.
I am sorry but this is plainly wrong. Debian is running on volunteer time and,
yes
On Saturday 8 July 2000, at 21 h 26,
the keyboard of John Leuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a systems software
> writer you can't choose what to provide, you have to provide what people
> are using and want.
I am sorry but this is plainly wrong. Debian is running on volunteer time and,
ye
12 matches
Mail list logo
