Re: Versions for java-virtual-machine

1999-09-17 Thread Ean R . Schuessler
On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 09:35:57AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > And kaffe 1.0.b4? What version of the VM does it provide? And gcj compiles > which version of the language? One of the problems with versioning is that > compliance to a specific version of the VM spec (for the JVMs) or to a

Re: Versions for java-virtual-machine

1999-09-17 Thread Cris J. Holdorph
> And kaffe 1.0.b4? What version of the VM does it provide? And gcj compiles > which version of the language? One of the problems with versioning is that > compliance to a specific version of the VM spec (for the JVMs) or to a > specific version of the language (for compilers) is typically not d

Re: Versions for java-virtual-machine

1999-09-17 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Thursday 16 September 1999, at 20 h 5, the keyboard of Julio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > matters here is the Java virtual machine specification. I agree that using jdk > compliance is not a good thing, but it'd be better to provide a more complete > list of what a jdk provides. For example,