On Thursday 16 September 1999, at 20 h 5, the keyboard of Julio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> matters here is the Java virtual machine specification. I agree that using jdk > compliance is not a good thing, but it'd be better to provide a more complete > list of what a jdk provides. For example, jdk 1.1 provides a virtual machine > 1. And kaffe 1.0.b4? What version of the VM does it provide? And gcj compiles which version of the language? One of the problems with versioning is that compliance to a specific version of the VM spec (for the JVMs) or to a specific version of the language (for compilers) is typically not documented (or well hidden).