On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 06:03:20AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> You have to either be doing something very intensive or very wrong to need
> more than one server for 20K users. Last time I did this I got 250K users
> per server, and I believe that I could have easily doubled that if I was
> al
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 09:26:53PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 02:01:28 +1000, Russell wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2004/0907opensourc.html?net
>
> ..hear, hear. But you guys let the weenies get away with confusing
> their "end u
Hi Marcin,
How many files do you have in a single directory? > 100 ?
Which filesystem are you using? You may want to try playimg with reiserfs...
Regards
Andrew
Marcin Owsiany wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 06:03:20AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
You have to either be doing something very intensi
On Sep 9, 2004, at 2:44 AM, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
More than 90% of the disk transactions are on the (logical) disk where
mail is stored. The only processes which touch that disk, are qmail
delivery processes (qmail handed mail by another SMTP-IN box: 0.8 local
deliveries per second) and courierpop3
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 06:43:21AM -0600, Nate Duehr wrote:
>
> On Sep 9, 2004, at 2:44 AM, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> >
> >More than 90% of the disk transactions are on the (logical) disk where
> >mail is stored. The only processes which touch that disk, are qmail
> >delivery processes (qmail handed
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> On behalf of all joe-job victims: Whatever you do, *please* do it in a way
> that allows you to know whether mail is going to be delivered at the
> front-end incoming SMTP server. (should be trivial if your user database is
> in LDAP or some SQL db or w
Citát "Ruth A. Kramer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> > On behalf of all joe-job victims: Whatever you do, *please* do it in a way
> > that allows you to know whether mail is going to be delivered at the
> > front-end incoming SMTP server. (should be trivial i
> For the same reason I have some regexp patterns build into postfix body_checks
> for most common viruses. Postfix rejects these mails immediately. This usually
> catch about 90% of viruses, so I save a lot of CPU in virus checking of
> incoming mail...
Could you send your regexes, 90% of viruses
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 15:32:04 +0200, Marek wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Citát "Ruth A. Kramer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> > > On behalf of all joe-job victims: Whatever you do, *please* do it
> > > in a way that allows you to know whether m
Dear Lucas,
I tried with linear and my debian just boot! I'm sending to you my lilo.conf file (in
case
it seems to you useful for your how-to with LILO) after making some changes that
"lilo-doc" recommended for raid booting.
As I thought it couldn't be the only problem... Could you take a look t
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 18:44, Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 06:03:20AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > You have to either be doing something very intensive or very wrong to
> > need more than one server for 20K users. Last time I did this I got 250K
> > users per
Hello Maykel,
Thursday, September 9, 2004, 15:59:02, you wrote:
MM> Could you send your regexes, 90% of viruses stopped by regexes sounds
MM> interesting.
In fact most of them are stopped by general regexps rejecting some
dangerous attachments, so only those with .exe and .zip (which I can't
blo
12 matches
Mail list logo
