Kris Deugau wrote:
> Anil Gupte wrote:
> > I am having a problem with one of my customers who is using Outlook
> > 2000 SP-3 to connect to our Qmail server. When downloading messages
> > from his POP account, Outlook will hang. It is most likely a
> > corrupted message, since he can delete the me
Hi,
i remember that one of our custormers had the same problem. he couldnt
connect
his outlook to our qmail server, when the message was "large".
> it happens with any MTA and any POP daemon. that's because the problem is
not
> in the message, the MTA or the POP daemon. it's in outlook.
no,
FWIW, Outlook fails the POP connection to my ISP, without proceeding to
other messages, on all messages that are header-only with no payload,
i.e., finish with a single blank line only. I don't know if these are
'valid' messages according to SMTP, but in any case I can see them
through the web int
Is it possible that it is because of grsec and acl patches that I use to my
2.4.26 kernel? Or I have to a make different MailScanner configuration if I
run it inside of a chroot?
Dmitry
On Friday 23 July 2004 02:03, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello Dmitry,
>
> Am 2004-07-23
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 07:02:22PM -0400, ITC-Hosting wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> With the current discussion of greylisting and SPAM, wondering if anyone
> here has implemented or tested DSPAM?
Great success, here. I allow training by way of forwarding messages
(with SMTP AUTH, of course), as well
Hello again -
I am glad to see
that the majority of what I have googled so far and the general consensus among
the list members is that this is a great way to go.
We are currently
running a Postfix / Amavisd-new / Courier-imap / SpamAssassin combination with a
MySQL backend. I am
cur
On Friday 23 July 2004 15.46, ITC-Hosting wrote:
> We are currently running a Postfix[...]
Since you're running postfix... you may want to have a look at
greylisting - the postgrey package provides this
Unfortunately, postfix 2.1 is required, so woody users will have to
wait. Greylisting is a
On Friday 23 July 2004 16:27, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> On Friday 23 July 2004 15.46, ITC-Hosting wrote:
> > We are currently running a Postfix[...]
>
> Since you're running postfix... you may want to have a look at
> greylisting - the postgrey package provides this
>
> Unfortu
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, maarten wrote:
> On Friday 23 July 2004 16:27, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> > On Friday 23 July 2004 15.46, ITC-Hosting wrote:
> > > We are currently running a Postfix[...]
> >
> > Since you're running postfix... you may want to have a look at
> > greylisting
Am 2004-07-23 15:19:33, schrieb Dmitry Golubev:
>Is it possible that it is because of grsec and acl patches that I use to my
>2.4.26 kernel? Or I have to a make different MailScanner configuration if I
>run it inside of a chroot?
I do not know, because I do not use grsec and acl patches.
I use o
Craig Sanders wrote:
> the problem is that outlook is broken. it's broken in many ways but
> this specific problem is due to the fact that outlook locks up when
> downloading "large" messages. it doesn't have to be an attachment,
> if the message is too large, then outlook will hang. i don't re
I have partial victory - I copied everything from /usr/lib into my
chroot's /usr/lib, and it just started to work. BUT as my script which 'ldd'
all the executables and copy all the needed libraries to chroot's /lib is
tested and working, I suspect somebody has put an absolute path to a
library.
On Friday 23 July 2004 17:12, Kris Deugau wrote:
> Craig Sanders wrote:
> > the problem is that outlook is broken. it's broken in many ways but
> > this specific problem is due to the fact that outlook locks up when
> > downloading "large" messages. it doesn't have to be an attachment,
> > if th
Somone wrote:
>I am having a problem with one of my customers who is using Outlook 2000
>SP-3 to connect to our Qmail server. When downloading messages from his
> POP account, Outlook will hang. It is most likely a corrupted message,
The only concrete case I've tracked down was Outlook choking
I found the missing library - it is libdb-4.0.so Why has not my ldd script
found it? I assume it is a bug that (a) ldd can not find it (b) without it,
mailscannet just takes over all the resources
Dmitry
On Friday 23 July 2004 18:47, Dmitry Golubev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have partial vi
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 11:12:06AM -0400, Kris Deugau wrote:
> Craig Sanders wrote:
> > the problem is that outlook is broken. it's broken in many ways but
> > this specific problem is due to the fact that outlook locks up when
> > downloading "large" messages. it doesn't have to be an attachmen
Am 2004-07-23 19:53:56, schrieb Dmitry Golubev:
>I found the missing library - it is libdb-4.0.so Why has not my ldd script
>found it? I assume it is a bug that (a) ldd can not find it (b) without it,
>mailscannet just takes over all the resources
>
>Dmitry
Fine if your problem is solved...
Gr
This one time, at band camp, Dmitry Golubev said:
> I found the missing library - it is libdb-4.0.so Why has not my ldd script
> found it? I assume it is a bug that (a) ldd can not find it (b) without it,
> mailscannet just takes over all the resources
>
> Dmitry
I suspect mailscanner is a perl
18 matches
Mail list logo
