ip aliasing and second default gw in /etc/network/interfaces

2003-09-03 Thread Peter Nome
Greetings ! I'm hoping some smart soul can help me with this. After experimenting a bit, I discovered that I could add a second ip address by issuing ifconfig eth0:1 192.168.1.92 up Once that's in pace, I found I could add a second default gatway by issuing route add default gw 19

Re: ip aliasing and second default gw in /etc/network/interfaces

2003-09-03 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 01:23:58AM -0700, Peter Nome wrote: *snip* > My situation is that I have two subnets, each of which have their own DSL gateway, > and I'd > like the subnet machines (selectively) to be able to talk to each other and to have > the other > DSL router as a fallback when it

Re: ip aliasing and second default gw in /etc/network/interfaces

2003-09-03 Thread Sami Haahtinen
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 01:23:58AM -0700, Peter Nome wrote: > I'm hoping some smart soul can help me with this. After experimenting > a bit, I discovered that I could add a second ip address by issuing > > ifconfig eth0:1 192.168.1.92 up So far so good.. > Once that's in pace, I found I c

Sendmail or Qmail ? ..

2003-09-03 Thread Rudi Starcevic
Hi, Sorry to bother you all with this repeat question. I've have searched around and seen plenty of opinions but I'd like to ask again and get the latest from this list. Sendmail or Qmail ? That is my question. Currently we use Sendmail. It's worked fine, well actually problem free so better t

Re: Sendmail or Qmail ? ..

2003-09-03 Thread Greg Hindson
Why change something thats working perfectly ?? - Original Message - From: Rudi Starcevic To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:43 PM Subject: Sendmail or Qmail ? .. Hi,Sorry to bother you all with this repeat question.I've have search

Re: Sendmail or Qmail ? ..

2003-09-03 Thread Alex Borges
It all depends qmail has a very non standard way of being managed. Its almost meta-unix. That said, its VERY flexible, extremely powerfull, once you get a hang of it INCREDEBLY EASY to manage. And it has no paralell in security (AGES and AGES better than sendmail) Sadly, its non free. You can

Re: Sendmail or Qmail ? ..

2003-09-03 Thread M. Lucas
I'm using Qmail for over 4 years on small installations without any problems The biggest problem with qmail is DJB's attitude. The people on the qmail list have the same attitude, but they know everything about the source and can help you. I only install Qmail.. Maurice Lucas On Thu, 2003-09-04

Re: Sendmail or Qmail ? ..

2003-09-03 Thread Jamie Baddeley
so how does exim compare in all of this? jamie On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 18:10, Alex Borges wrote: > It all depends > > qmail has a very non standard way of being managed. Its almost > meta-unix. That said, its VERY flexible, extremely powerfull, once you > get a hang of it INCREDEBLY EASY to manag