Re: SOCKS

2001-10-26 Thread Michael Wood
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 08:01:33PM -0700, Asher Densmore-Lynn wrote: > What're my options for forcing a program to use SOCKS when it > doesn't expecially want to? I think Dante comes with a shared library which you can use to do that. (I suppose you use LD_PRELOAD or something. I've not tried i

Re: SOCKS

2001-10-26 Thread Karl E. Jorgensen
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 08:01:33PM -0700, Asher Densmore-Lynn wrote: > What're my options for forcing a program to use SOCKS when it doesn't > expecially want to? What about socksify (apt-cache show dante-client)? Haven't tried it myself though. YMMV. > I've installed a SOCKS proxy on a machine

Exchange 2000 replacement

2001-10-26 Thread Teunis Peters
Am currently exploring building a machine for a corporation to replace their soon-to-be-installed exchange 2000 server... (yes - the word "red tape" comes to mind. So does "corporate infight" *grin*) Anyways I'm exploring exactly this situation. At this point I've tried cyrus+OpenLDAP+postfix+h

policies for securing privacy systemwide against random wiretap/nettap

2001-10-26 Thread cfm
Given recent passage of the Patriot Act here in US, I'm re-evaluating privacy policies at the ISP I run. I'm curious what mechanisms and policies we might keep/implement to preserve the privacy and integrity of our clients. Some are obvious: * gnpgp/pgp email * quick and regular deletion of

Re: policies for securing privacy systemwide against random wiretap/nettap

2001-10-26 Thread Peter Billson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Given recent passage of the Patriot Act here in US, I'm re-evaluating > privacy policies at the ISP I run. > > I'm curious what mechanisms and policies we might keep/implement > to preserve the privacy and integrity of our clients. Some are obvious: > * gnpgp/pgp

Re: SOCKS

2001-10-26 Thread Michael Wood
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 08:01:33PM -0700, Asher Densmore-Lynn wrote: > What're my options for forcing a program to use SOCKS when it > doesn't expecially want to? I think Dante comes with a shared library which you can use to do that. (I suppose you use LD_PRELOAD or something. I've not tried it

Re: SOCKS

2001-10-26 Thread Karl E. Jorgensen
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 08:01:33PM -0700, Asher Densmore-Lynn wrote: > What're my options for forcing a program to use SOCKS when it doesn't > expecially want to? What about socksify (apt-cache show dante-client)? Haven't tried it myself though. YMMV. > I've installed a SOCKS proxy on a machine t

Exchange 2000 replacement

2001-10-26 Thread Teunis Peters
Am currently exploring building a machine for a corporation to replace their soon-to-be-installed exchange 2000 server... (yes - the word "red tape" comes to mind. So does "corporate infight" *grin*) Anyways I'm exploring exactly this situation. At this point I've tried cyrus+OpenLDAP+postfix+ho

policies for securing privacy systemwide against random wiretap/nettap

2001-10-26 Thread cfm
Given recent passage of the Patriot Act here in US, I'm re-evaluating privacy policies at the ISP I run. I'm curious what mechanisms and policies we might keep/implement to preserve the privacy and integrity of our clients. Some are obvious: * gnpgp/pgp email * quick and regular deletion of

Re: policies for securing privacy systemwide against random wiretap/nettap

2001-10-26 Thread Peter Billson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Given recent passage of the Patriot Act here in US, I'm re-evaluating > privacy policies at the ISP I run. > > I'm curious what mechanisms and policies we might keep/implement > to preserve the privacy and integrity of our clients. Some are obvious: > * gnpgp/pgp e