We have a series proxys caching our internal website (around 11 pops /
proxys ) all running cisco routers so we can use transparent proxying in
each location. We when make the changes at the main location it can
sometimes take up to 3 days for the changes to filter through to the others
pops. Is t
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 10:43:20PM -0400, Chris Wagner wrote:
> At 07:29 PM 5/16/00 -0400, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
> >Autoinstall (Red Hat's kickstart)
> > This is also something fairly important. We need this as we do a
> > lot of mass installs.
>
> For mass installs, just make a standard issue CD,
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 08:44:18PM -0700, David Lynn wrote:
> I agree - dpkg and apt are great compared to rpm's. However, that's
> all assuming that there are debian packages out there that are up to
> date (which they're generally not). But this seems to be the only
> major drawback I've found
Hi all,
I'm about to set up a Dell 1300 server and I'm wondering what tape drive should
I buy for backup purpose. Suggestions from their e-commerce site are DAT 20/40
with autoloader, DLT 4000 20/40 or DLT 7000 35/70.
Does anybody know if those are supported/any good ?
Any success stories about a
> Debian is using LDAP to authenticate users but I couldnt realize how it's
> done.
apt-get install pam-ldap, or sth like that,
and then switch to ldap authentication using /etc/pam.d/* files..
i tried it, it works like a charm. it even supports md5 hashing,
and i like it.
> How to add/remove e
On Tue, 16 May 2000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 12:28:40PM +0200, Robert Varga wrote:
>
> > Its documentation is a joke I think. It is 800 pages, but unusable for
> > anything but reading it from the start, but if you want to search in it
> > quickly and haven't read it before,
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 05:28:54PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 10:43:20PM -0400, Chris Wagner wrote:
> > At 07:29 PM 5/16/00 -0400, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
> > >Autoinstall (Red Hat's kickstart)
> > > This is also something fairly important. We need this as we do a
> > > lot
Previously Chris Wagner wrote:
> RPM is a piece of crap compared to dpkg, and now we have apt (advanced
> package tool).
Can we please not be so negative about rpm? I'll agree that dpkg is
better (and of course I'm completely not biased here :), but rpm
is not a piece of crap.
Wichert.
--
___
Welcome,
my problem is that I have to transfer large amount of data (20~50 Gigs)
daily.
And it can't be done via network due to 'secret' nature of that data.
I considered IDE disk put in hot-swap bay, but I found that's not the
best way to do that:
i got system on scsi disc, compiled ide-d
what about a Sony AIT tape drive. Kind of expensive. Not sure about the
linux support.
We have two of them and they are great and fast.
Ben MCSE, CNA
-Original Message-
From: Dariush Pietrzak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 9:38 AM
To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
| Welcome,
| my problem is that I have to transfer large amount of data (20~50 Gigs)
| daily.
| And it can't be done via network due to 'secret' nature of that data.
Umm...how about encrypting it prior to sending it across the network.
I've used schemes such as piping data across an SSH proce
--- David Lynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I agree - dpkg and apt are great compared to rpm's. However, that's all
> assuming that there are debian packages out there that are up to date
> (which they're generally not). But this seems to be the only major
> drawback I've found to Debian.
>
>
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 19:29:39 -0400, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
> Dpkg vs RPM
> Both managability and build packages. I have heard a lot
> of "good things" about dpkg.
Have a look at http://www.kitenet.net/~joey/pkg-comp/ for a detailed
overview by Joey Hess of various package management
Hi
> P.S. Does anyone know if there is there something wrong with the default
> configuration of OpenLDAP in potato? I cannot connect to my server with
> any of the command line (or other) tools.
After a long time fiddling around I've finally managed to get it running.
As far as I can tell now t
** On May 16, Christian Hammers scribbled:
> Hi
>
> > P.S. Does anyone know if there is there something wrong with the default
> > configuration of OpenLDAP in potato? I cannot connect to my server with
> > any of the command line (or other) tools.
> After a long time fiddling around I've finall
>| my problem is that I have to transfer large amount of data (20~50 Gigs)
>| daily.
>| And it can't be done via network due to 'secret' nature of that data.
>
>Umm...how about encrypting it prior to sending it across the network.
>I've used schemes such as piping data across an SSH process to
I agree, rpm is not a piece of crap. deb packages are a lot harder to create
for the novice users. There is not much documentation to help in this area
either. Also, when updates are released .debs are usually the last to be
released (because someone usually
has to hack an .rpm or something s
On Wed, 17 May 2000, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> my problem is that I have to transfer large amount of data (20~50 Gigs)
> daily.
We do something similar to this.
> And it can't be done via network due to 'secret' nature of that data.
We do it by having a second NIC card on the machines using in
I have to disagree there. I've found Debian packs to be extremely up to
date, atleast on the security end. And even on routine maintanance, the lag
is not that bad.
At 08:44 PM 5/16/00 -0700, David Lynn wrote:
>I agree - dpkg and apt are great compared to rpm's. However, that's all
>assuming th
The only real difference between stable and unstable is that unstable has up
to date packages. The only thing stable has over unstable is the track
history of "yeah all this stuff has worked together for a LONG time".
At 12:16 AM 5/17/00 -0400, Will Lowe wrote:
>Actually, unstable is usually pret
Sorry, but I was so underwhelmed by rpm's capabilities and my reaction was
so one sidedly negative that I can't describe it any other way. It is what
I typed.
At 02:55 PM 5/17/00 +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>Previously Chris Wagner wrote:
>> RPM is a piece of crap compared to dpkg, and now we
I used a standard low cost IDE HP Travan tape drive using TR4 cartridges and
it worked fine. Though every once and a while it would complain and I'ld
have to take the tape out an put it back in. For non-insane applications
this would be adequate. A simple tar script run out of cron kept me alive
Have setup transparent proxy using an access-list on a Cisco 1603 and
running ipchains to forward packets to squid on the proxy. When I have the
proxy set ( manual http proxy ) it works fine, but when proxy is disable and
transparent should take affect this is what happends:
Packet gets forwarded
Folks,
I have used dpkg, and been forced to use rpm, and rpm is just as good, more
or less.
The problem is that there is nothing equivalent to dselect or apt in RedHat.
I rarely call dpkg directly, unless libc6 is stuck again ;-), but the
nearest that RedHat has to a mid-level tool is GnoRPM, whi
hi,
we have a client who is claiming he's not receiving all his email.
people are apparently sending him messages and he's not receiving it.
oh, and his PA is reading his mail as well, but she 'swears she never deletes
anything'
I've checked the exim logs and all the mail is delivered t
Dariush,
Assuming you are worried by people with promiscuous ethernet cards,
packet-sniffing. Put in a second NIC, run a crossover UTP? I assume the
machine's are close by. Hotswapping a hard disk seems risky, if you do it
daily.
On the other hand, if you are not CPU constrained, run PPTP or
At 02:11 AM 5/18/00 GMT, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> system:
> Debian 2.1
> exim 2.05-2
> qpopper 2.3-4
CuCiPOP tells you how many messages were downloaded by default. :) If that
log says 10 messages were pulled, then HE DID download 10 messages. If that
number syncs up with what exim says it de
Have you looked at the swappable disks broadcasters use?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Dariush Pietrzak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Cc: ;
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 9:37 PM
> Subject: Transfer data between two comps without network
>
>
> > Welcome,
> > my problem is that I hav
According to Sanjeev Ghane Gupta:
> I have used dpkg, and been forced to use rpm, and rpm is just as
> good, more or less.
Actually, from what I've been told, rpm has at least one serious
technical flaw: The order of execution for pre-install and
post-install scripts is nonsensical for upgrades.
> "Jeremy" == Jeremy Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeremy> Autoinstall (Red Hat's kickstart)
Jeremy> This is also something fairly important. We need this as we do
a
Jeremy> lot of mass installs.
The best way to do that that I've found so far is to set up a box
wi
30 matches
Mail list logo
