Leonardo Boselli wrote:
>
> You forget one thing: there are 10 other machines (addresses 3 to 13)
> that need not to be firewalled, and must be accessible from
> ANY pother
> ost either internally and externally, without passing the FW.
> The second group really is not a problem, since are just
ng
> > On Wednesday 24 September 2003 10:47, Leonardo Boselli wrote:
> >
> > > I have a /24 subnet.
> > > .1 is the gateway and almost all IP from 2 to 254 are occupied.
> > > I would like to split the host in three groups:
> > > 12 that can have full acces
alle 9:25 Fraser Campbell immise in rete
> On Wednesday 24 September 2003 10:47, Leonardo Boselli wrote:
>
> > I have a /24 subnet.
> > .1 is the gateway and almost all IP from 2 to 254 are occupied.
> > I would like to split the host in three groups:
> > 12 that ca
On Wednesday 24 September 2003 10:47, Leonardo Boselli wrote:
> I have a /24 subnet.
> .1 is the gateway and almost all IP from 2 to 254 are occupied.
> I would like to split the host in three groups:
> 12 that can have full access, 12 thought one firewall and the other 205
> th
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:47, Leonardo Boselli wrote:
> I have a /24 subnet.
> .1 is the gateway and almost all IP from 2 to 254 are occupied.
> I would like to split the host in three groups:
> 12 that can have full access, 12 thought one firewall and the other 205
> throught a secon
255.255.255.0 secondfw
?
for the possible various services (nb: the DNS are all in the 2/14
subnet)
Il 25 Sep 2003 alle 1:09 Russell Coker immise in rete
> On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:47, Leonardo Boselli wrote:
> > I have a /24 subnet.
> Have 1..14 as one subnet (15 is broadcast) and ha
I have a /24 subnet.
.1 is the gateway and almost all IP from 2 to 254 are occupied.
I would like to split the host in three groups:
12 that can have full access, 12 thought one firewall and the other 205
throught a second firewall.
I cannot chanmge the number of some machines, so the only option
At 01:44 PM 7/14/00 -0700, Kevin wrote:
>When our customers dial-in, and they run winipcfg in 98 it shows that
>their subnet is 255.0.0.0. Recently a customer complained that this
>was degrading their performance. I've tried some other isps to see
>what happens on theirs and its
At 01:44 PM 7/14/00 -0700, Kevin wrote:
>When our customers dial-in, and they run winipcfg in 98 it shows that
>their subnet is 255.0.0.0. Recently a customer complained that this
>was degrading their performance. I've tried some other isps to see
>what happens on theirs an
When our customers dial-in, and they run winipcfg in 98 it shows that
their subnet is 255.0.0.0. Recently a customer complained that this
was degrading their performance. I've tried some other isps to see
what happens on theirs and its about 50/50 with 255.0.0.0 and
255.255.255.0. My que
When our customers dial-in, and they run winipcfg in 98 it shows that
their subnet is 255.0.0.0. Recently a customer complained that this
was degrading their performance. I've tried some other isps to see
what happens on theirs and its about 50/50 with 255.0.0.0 and
255.255.255.0. My que
Hi all
I did a subnet using ip masquerade in a computer with two
ne2000 cards to link some computers to the internet, and it is working
fine.Is it possible to limit the bandwidth of a host in this subnet? Is
there a way that the computer that works as a gateway control "how" the
12 matches
Mail list logo
