On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 at 14:50:30 +0200, Craig wrote:
> Hi Fellows
>
> Has anyone got suggestions on a good pop3 server
> to use on my mail server. Something that can take
> a hammering and not ipopd, been having some
> problems with it and qpopper I think has security
&g
* Craig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [11 Apr 2002 08:50]:
> Has anyone got suggestions on a good pop3 server
> to use on my mail server. Something that can take
> a hammering and not ipopd, been having some
> problems with it and qpopper I think has security
> issues.
qmail comes wit
Hello "Craig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
I recommend courier-pop with Postfix or qmail, which give fine
performance and high flexibility.
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 14:50:30 +0200
"Craig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Fellows
>
> Has anyone got suggestions
Hi Fellows
Has anyone got suggestions on a good pop3 server
to use on my mail server. Something that can take
a hammering and not ipopd, been having some
problems with it and qpopper I think has security
issues.
Any help will be appreciated :)
Craig
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
> > Feb 15 09:44:18 excalibur xinetd[316]: FAIL: pop-3 address
> > from=80.25.136.215
Sorry, It was all my mistake. I had an "only_from = net-address" line in the
"default" section of the /etc/xinetd.conf file.
Thanks all,
Davi Leal
> > Feb 15 09:44:18 excalibur xinetd[316]: FAIL: pop-3 address
> > from=80.25.136.215
Sorry, It was all my mistake. I had an "only_from = net-address" line in the
"default" section of the /etc/xinetd.conf file.
Thanks all,
Davi Leal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Davi Leal wrote:
> Feb 15 09:44:18 excalibur xinetd[316]: FAIL: pop-3 address
> from=80.25.136.215
> Note: The client address 80.25.136.215 has not a DNS entry, neither direct
> nor reverse. (nslookup, dig). The /etc/hosts.allow has _only_ the "ALL: ALL"
> line.
Have your tr
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Davi Leal wrote:
> Feb 15 09:44:18 excalibur xinetd[316]: FAIL: pop-3 address
> from=80.25.136.215
> Note: The client address 80.25.136.215 has not a DNS entry, neither direct
> nor reverse. (nslookup, dig). The /etc/hosts.allow has _only_ the "ALL: ALL"
> line.
Have your t
From: "Jeremy C. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > qpopper 2.53-5 on xinetd.conf
>
> > $ telnet 194.224.7.3 110
> > Trying 194.224.7.3...
> > Connected to 194.224.7.3.
> > Escape character is '^]'.
> > Connection closed by foreign host.
> > $
> >
> > Though I am using the '-d' (debug) option
From: "Jeremy C. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > qpopper 2.53-5 on xinetd.conf
>
> > $ telnet 194.224.7.3 110
> > Trying 194.224.7.3...
> > Connected to 194.224.7.3.
> > Escape character is '^]'.
> > Connection closed by foreign host.
> > $
> >
> > Though I am using the '-d' (debug) optio
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Davi Leal wrote:
> qpopper 2.53-5 on xinetd.conf
> $ telnet 194.224.7.3 110
> Trying 194.224.7.3...
> Connected to 194.224.7.3.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> Connection closed by foreign host.
> $
>
> Though I am using the '-d' (debug) option of qpopper, it does no
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 (potato) distribution as base to the email server:
qpopper 2.53-5 on xinetd.conf
sendmail 8.12.1-5FROM woody. Not on xinetd.conf
# All right connecting from clients using our RADIUS service to get one of
our ClassC IPs. Note: The pop3 server use one of
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Davi Leal wrote:
> qpopper 2.53-5 on xinetd.conf
> $ telnet 194.224.7.3 110
> Trying 194.224.7.3...
> Connected to 194.224.7.3.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> Connection closed by foreign host.
> $
>
> Though I am using the '-d' (debug) option of qpopper, it does n
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 (potato) distribution as base to the email server:
qpopper 2.53-5 on xinetd.conf
sendmail 8.12.1-5FROM woody. Not on xinetd.conf
# All right connecting from clients using our RADIUS service to get one of
our ClassC IPs. Note: The pop3 server use one of
ee, basically. Once you get through the not-so-good
documentation, you'll have a working system that just... works!
phil.
Robert Waldner wrote:
>
> (please send your mails in text only)
>
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2001 10:36:28 +0200, Javier Castillo Alcibar writes:
> > I am
(please send your mails in text only)
On Fri, 10 Aug 2001 10:36:28 +0200, Javier Castillo Alcibar writes:
> I am looking for a good pop3 server in the woody(testing)
>distribution. I was going to install qpopper v4, but it runs from inetd
>daemon, what I think is a bad idea
Title: Good pop3 server
Hi all,
I am looking for a good pop3 server in the woody(testing) distribution. I was going to install qpopper v4, but it runs from inetd daemon, what I think is a bad idea from the performance point of view..
Any ideas??
Thanks
> > gnu-pop3d has been removed from debian due to it's instability.
> Where can I find more information about gnu-pop3d being removed from
> Debian?
just try installing it - it has been removed from all the mirrors,
and I mailed gnu-pop3d maintainer and he told me that it had been removed
from deb
> > gnu-pop3d has been removed from debian due to it's instability.
> Where can I find more information about gnu-pop3d being removed from
> Debian?
just try installing it - it has been removed from all the mirrors,
and I mailed gnu-pop3d maintainer and he told me that it had been removed
from de
At 09:49 AM 6/27/2000 -0700, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
I use gnu-pop3d with a bunch of patches I made that hopefully get rid of
the instability problems and add capability for virtual domains. But I
haven't built a Debian package of my patched gnu-pop3d. For more
information about my setup visit:
http
At 09:49 AM 6/27/2000 -0700, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
>I use gnu-pop3d with a bunch of patches I made that hopefully get rid of
>the instability problems and add capability for virtual domains. But I
>haven't built a Debian package of my patched gnu-pop3d. For more
>information about my setup visit:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 10:03:05PM +0200, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> Hello,
> which packaged with debian pop3d would you people recommend?
> which one do you use?
qmail with pop3d and friends seems to be pretty solid in my short experience
with them. I've not got hundreds of users, but it's said
I'ld recommend Cucipop due to it's security record. That's what I use.
Just don't look at the source code. :)
At 10:03 PM 6/26/00 +0200, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
>Hello,
>which packaged with debian pop3d would you people recommend?
> which one do you use?
+---
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 10:03:05PM +0200, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> Hello,
> which packaged with debian pop3d would you people recommend?
> which one do you use?
qmail with pop3d and friends seems to be pretty solid in my short experience
with them. I've not got hundreds of users, but it's said
I'ld recommend Cucipop due to it's security record. That's what I use.
Just don't look at the source code. :)
At 10:03 PM 6/26/00 +0200, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
>Hello,
>which packaged with debian pop3d would you people recommend?
> which one do you use?
+--
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> gnu-pop3d has been removed from debian due to it's instability.
Where can I find more information about gnu-pop3d being removed from
Debian?
> and of course how would one host virtual e-mail domains (one IP, one UID)
I use gnu-pop3d with a bunch of
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> gnu-pop3d has been removed from debian due to it's instability.
Where can I find more information about gnu-pop3d being removed from
Debian?
> and of course how would one host virtual e-mail domains (one IP, one UID)
I use gnu-pop3d with a bunch o
Hello,
which packaged with debian pop3d would you people recommend?
which one do you use?
apt-cache search pop3d on potato shows only gnu-pop3d and cyrus-pop3,
cyrus ain't best choice - it's non-free, and as cyrus's manual says -
it's designed for closed hosts, hosting only as e-mail serv
Hello,
which packaged with debian pop3d would you people recommend?
which one do you use?
apt-cache search pop3d on potato shows only gnu-pop3d and cyrus-pop3,
cyrus ain't best choice - it's non-free, and as cyrus's manual says -
it's designed for closed hosts, hosting only as e-mail ser
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Robert H. Clugston wrote:
>I thought cucipop was more popular because it does SQL connections?
>
I'm sure there is a percentage of people that use SQL, but it's probably
very small.
I think more people are concerned with performance and reliability. I
could be wrong tho.
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Robert H. Clugston wrote:
> I thought cucipop was more popular because it does SQL connections?
so does qpopper.
--
[-]
kazmer at any cost ! ++ Minek olvasol linux-kezdot ha nem birod ? - sstu
I thought cucipop was more popular because it does SQL connections?
-Original Message-
From: John Gonzalez/netMDC admin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2000 4:34 PM
To: Chris Wagner
Cc: 'debian-isp'
Subject: Re: pop3 server
On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Ch
On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Chris Wagner wrote:
>At 10:10 AM 4/19/00 +0200, Christian Jannesson wrote:
>>Whats so speciall about cucipop? I use qpopper and i havent had any
>>trouble with it.
>
>It's more secure than other poppers.
I dont honestly think EITHER package has been audited. It's true, that
c
At 10:10 AM 4/19/00 +0200, Christian Jannesson wrote:
>Whats so speciall about cucipop? I use qpopper and i havent had any
>trouble with it.
It's more secure than other poppers.
+---+
|-=I T ' S P R I N C I P L E T H A T C
34 matches
Mail list logo
