Re: Sendmail & Virtual user table.

2003-01-14 Thread ragnar
Quoting Eduard Ballester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello > > > I realize I can set up a catch all for each of the domains, but I'm > > looking for something a little more elegant. Sorry to go of subject but vserver is "more elegant" http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/miscprj/s_context.hc It is RedHat ba

Re: Sendmail & Virtual user table.

2003-01-14 Thread Eduard Ballester
Hello > I realize I can set up a catch all for each of the domains, but I'm > looking for something a little more elegant. I think that the only way is this: @thisdomain.com %1.thisdomain @thatdomain.net %1.thatdomain @theotherdomain.org %1.theotherdomain [EMAIL PROTECTED] is local user name

Re: Sendmail & Virtual user table.

2003-01-13 Thread Brad Lay
As far as I know, theres no way around this. By the way sendmail (and any other MTA as well), anything that is listed in 'local-host-names' is treated as a domain that will be accepted for any valid user. The only way I can think of is mapping every user email to each user, not with a catchall. Th

Sendmail & Virtual user table.

2003-01-13 Thread Dustin Douglas
Hey guys, got a connundrum and would like some pointers about it. Fairly basic Sendmail setup hosting email for about 30 domains. Email addresses mapped to local users via virtusertable. Say we've got the following domains hosted on this mail server. thisdomain.com thatdomain.net theotherdomai