On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Thedore Knab wrote:
> I am not talking about huge delays but rather occasional 2-5 second
> delays.
You are not, by any chanse, running NFS v3 over TCP on top of that?
Cheers,
Cristian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:36, Marcel Hicking wrote:
> > I know reiser had some problems earlier, but it's had more time
> > to knock the bugs out and seems fine to me now. I know XFS and
> > JFS have a longer history than reiser, but not on Linux, where
> > they are relative newbies.
>
> Still no quot
Tue, 11 Feb 2003 11:53:01 -0500
Thedore Knab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am moving away from using ext3 on my servers due to its high
> overhead and lower performance. I am considering either XFS or
> JFS.
>
> Does anybody know how XFS compares to JFS or if they can be
> compared together. I want to
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 22:57, Thedore Knab wrote:
> I am not talking about huge delays but rather occasional 2-5 second delays.
Have you run "iostat -x 10" or similar to see what those delays are from?
> I calculate that Courier IMAP is moving about 200-500 files every minute
> during the delays.
>
12 Feb 2003 09:54:37 +1100
Donovan Baarda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 03:53, Thedore Knab wrote:
> > I am moving away from using ext3 on my servers due to its
> > high overhead and lower performance. I am considering either
> > XFS or JFS.
>
> Just curious, but why is everyone av
There is no question, XFS and JFS have better perf than ext3. However,
in your particular problem, i would look at the FS performances as a
last resort. What about the general IO of this box ? (hdd quality , bus
speed , etc..etc..). Againm 500 files operations a minute does not
sounds to me as a re
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 09:54:37AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 03:53, Thedore Knab wrote:
> > I am moving away from using ext3 on my servers due to its high overhead and lower
> > performance. I am considering either XFS or JFS.
>
> Just curious, but why is everyone avoidi
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 03:53, Thedore Knab wrote:
> I am moving away from using ext3 on my servers due to its high overhead and lower
> performance. I am considering either XFS or JFS.
Just curious, but why is everyone avoiding ReiserFS? I know RH dumped
reiser in favor of ext3, but I know of hard-
I am not talking about huge delays but rather occasional 2-5 second delays.
I am using Courier IMAP with the Ext3 file-system and kernel quotas.
Postfix is delivering the Maildir file to the users' space.
The way Courier IMAP works is each mail becomes a separate '.imap' file.
Depending on the
Hi,
not that i ever tested any of those 2 new filesystem, but i have some
troubles to believe that the FS'd be the bottleneck in your scenario;
maybe i'm wrong, and 'd be interested to read some tests too though.
JeF
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 03:53, Thedore Knab wrote:
> I am moving away from using
10 matches
Mail list logo
