On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 03:53, Thedore Knab wrote: > I am moving away from using ext3 on my servers due to its high overhead and lower > performance. I am considering either XFS or JFS.
Just curious, but why is everyone avoiding ReiserFS? I know RH dumped reiser in favor of ext3, but I know of hard-core RH admins who are going back to reiser because it worked better for them than ext3 (more reliability apparently, also more features like live-resize with LVM). I know reiser had some problems earlier, but it's had more time to knock the bugs out and seems fine to me now. I know XFS and JFS have a longer history than reiser, but not on Linux, where they are relative newbies. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ABO: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more info, including pgp key ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
