Re: apache broke

2002-10-30 Thread Teun Vink
On 30 Oct 2002, Michael Knorra wrote: > Teun Vink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Ah ok thankx, I'll check that. Too bad the main site which I host on that > > machine is a webmail application using php+imap :( > > Bjoern.Falkenhagen said, that he has got a fixed imap.so module at > ftp://ftp

Re: apache broke

2002-10-30 Thread Michael Knorra
Teun Vink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ah ok thankx, I'll check that. Too bad the main site which I host on that > machine is a webmail application using php+imap :( Bjoern.Falkenhagen said, that he has got a fixed imap.so module at ftp://ftp.falkenhagen.net. Didn't check it.. perhaps you can t

Re: apache broke

2002-10-30 Thread Teun Vink
On 29 Oct 2002, Michael Knorra wrote: > > any additional info, please do not hesitate to contact me. > > Yes, I hope so. It is the imap.so. > You can comment out the entry "extension=imap.so" in the php.ini file > and start the apache. Ah ok thankx, I'll check that. Too bad the main site which

Re: apache broke

2002-10-30 Thread Teun Vink
On 30 Oct 2002, Michael Knorra wrote: > Teun Vink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Ah ok thankx, I'll check that. Too bad the main site which I host on that > > machine is a webmail application using php+imap :( > > Bjoern.Falkenhagen said, that he has got a fixed imap.so module at > ftp://ftp

Re: apache broke

2002-10-30 Thread Michael Knorra
Teun Vink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ah ok thankx, I'll check that. Too bad the main site which I host on that > machine is a webmail application using php+imap :( Bjoern.Falkenhagen said, that he has got a fixed imap.so module at ftp://ftp.falkenhagen.net. Didn't check it.. perhaps you can t

Re: apache broke

2002-10-30 Thread Teun Vink
On 29 Oct 2002, Michael Knorra wrote: > > any additional info, please do not hesitate to contact me. > > Yes, I hope so. It is the imap.so. > You can comment out the entry "extension=imap.so" in the php.ini file > and start the apache. Ah ok thankx, I'll check that. Too bad the main site which

Re: apache broke

2002-10-29 Thread Michael Knorra
Teun Vink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Hi, Hi, > Can anyone give me a hint (or solution ;-) for this problem? If you need > any additional info, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yes, I hope so. It is the imap.so. You can comment out the entry "extension=imap.so" in the php.ini file and

Re: apache broke

2002-10-29 Thread Michael Knorra
Teun Vink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Hi, Hi, > Can anyone give me a hint (or solution ;-) for this problem? If you need > any additional info, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yes, I hope so. It is the imap.so. You can comment out the entry "extension=imap.so" in the php.ini file and

Re: apache broke

2002-10-29 Thread Teun Vink
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Mark Lijftogt wrote: > > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:45:44AM +0100, > > > Teun Vink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > > a message of 39 lines which said: > > > > > > > Since I upgrade my SID box yesterday, I've been

Re: apache broke

2002-10-29 Thread Mark Lijftogt
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:45:44AM +0100, > > Teun Vink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > a message of 39 lines which said: > > > > > Since I upgrade my SID box yesterday, I've been having major > > > > First, sid is named unstable (sid ==

Re: apache broke

2002-10-29 Thread Teun Vink
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:45:44AM +0100, > Teun Vink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > a message of 39 lines which said: > > > Since I upgrade my SID box yesterday, I've been having major > > First, sid is named unstable (sid == System In Developme

Re: apache broke

2002-10-29 Thread Teun Vink
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Mark Lijftogt wrote: > > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:45:44AM +0100, > > > Teun Vink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > > a message of 39 lines which said: > > > > > > > Since I upgrade my SID box yesterday, I've been

Re: apache broke

2002-10-29 Thread Mark Lijftogt
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:45:44AM +0100, > > Teun Vink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > a message of 39 lines which said: > > > > > Since I upgrade my SID box yesterday, I've been having major > > > > First, sid is named unstable (sid ==

Re: apache broke

2002-10-29 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:45:44AM +0100, Teun Vink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 39 lines which said: > Since I upgrade my SID box yesterday, I've been having major First, sid is named unstable (sid == System In Development) and for a reason. > my Apache. Probably the Glibc problem

Re: apache broke

2002-10-29 Thread Teun Vink
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:45:44AM +0100, > Teun Vink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > a message of 39 lines which said: > > > Since I upgrade my SID box yesterday, I've been having major > > First, sid is named unstable (sid == System In Developme

Re: apache broke

2002-10-29 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:45:44AM +0100, Teun Vink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 39 lines which said: > Since I upgrade my SID box yesterday, I've been having major First, sid is named unstable (sid == System In Development) and for a reason. > my Apache. Probably the Glibc problem