> On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:45:44AM +0100, > > Teun Vink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > a message of 39 lines which said: > > > > > Since I upgrade my SID box yesterday, I've been having major > > > > First, sid is named unstable (sid == System In Development) and for a > > reason. > > > > I know that that's why it's called unstable. But that doesn't mean that we > shouldn't mention that and just wait until the package maintainer fixes > it.
Both one point :-) Although I understand Stephane, I always thought this was the way of improving, building etc.etc.etc. Dev-work. And because it's sid in this case, maybe your better of in the debian's dev. department. I personaly wouldn't be at ease running a sid production box. :-) Cheers, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
