"J.J. van Gorkum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> amavisd-new (amavisd-ng has some mime decoding problems... especially
> pgp/gpg encrypted mail)
As the maintainer of AMaViS-ng I am looking forward to your bug
report about the issues you have encountered.
Regards,
-Hilko
"J.J. van Gorkum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> amavisd-new (amavisd-ng has some mime decoding problems... especially
> pgp/gpg encrypted mail)
As the maintainer of AMaViS-ng I am looking forward to your bug
report about the issues you have encountered.
Regards,
-Hilko
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 05:11:38PM +0100, J.J. van Gorkum wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 11:22:46AM +0100, Hirling Endre wrote:
> > On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 14:12, J.J. van Gorkum wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 16:44, C. R. Oldham wrote:
> > > > Can someone fill me in on ClamAV a little bit, the
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 11:22:46AM +0100, Hirling Endre wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 14:12, J.J. van Gorkum wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 16:44, C. R. Oldham wrote:
> > > Can someone fill me in on ClamAV a little bit, the engine hasn't been
> > > updated in a long time, but the virus signature
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 05:11:38PM +0100, J.J. van Gorkum wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 11:22:46AM +0100, Hirling Endre wrote:
> > On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 14:12, J.J. van Gorkum wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 16:44, C. R. Oldham wrote:
> > > > Can someone fill me in on ClamAV a little bit, the
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 11:22:46AM +0100, Hirling Endre wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 14:12, J.J. van Gorkum wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 16:44, C. R. Oldham wrote:
> > > Can someone fill me in on ClamAV a little bit, the engine hasn't been
> > > updated in a long time, but the virus signature
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 11:22:46AM +0100, Hirling Endre wrote:
> What do you use to unpack MIME messages for clamav? I haven't find
> anything yet that can unpack messages the way trendmicro does, so clamav
> will miss a great deal of viruses, mostly in error messages.
E.g. amavis.
Wanted
On Saturday 08 March 2003 15:12, J.J. van Gorkum wrote:
> We use amavisd-new with TrendMicro and ClamAV. When the Trendmicro vinds
> a virus and clamav doesn't we mail the virus part of the email to the
> maker of clamv...
We use mailscanner (www.mailscanner.info) with f-prot here
Works rather well
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 14:12, J.J. van Gorkum wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 16:44, C. R. Oldham wrote:
> > Can someone fill me in on ClamAV a little bit, the engine hasn't been
> > updated in a long time, but the virus signatures appear very recent.
> > Who is updating the signatures? How often do
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 11:22:46AM +0100, Hirling Endre wrote:
> What do you use to unpack MIME messages for clamav? I haven't find
> anything yet that can unpack messages the way trendmicro does, so clamav
> will miss a great deal of viruses, mostly in error messages.
E.g. amavis.
Wanted
--
T
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 14:12, J.J. van Gorkum wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 16:44, C. R. Oldham wrote:
> > Can someone fill me in on ClamAV a little bit, the engine hasn't been
> > updated in a long time, but the virus signatures appear very recent.
> > Who is updating the signatures? How often do
On Saturday 08 March 2003 15:12, J.J. van Gorkum wrote:
> We use amavisd-new with TrendMicro and ClamAV. When the Trendmicro vinds
> a virus and clamav doesn't we mail the virus part of the email to the
> maker of clamv...
We use mailscanner (www.mailscanner.info) with f-prot here
Works rather well
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 16:44, C. R. Oldham wrote:
> Can someone fill me in on ClamAV a little bit, the engine hasn't been
> updated in a long time, but the virus signatures appear very recent.
> Who is updating the signatures? How often do they come out?
>
We use amavisd-new with TrendMicro and Cl
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 16:44, C. R. Oldham wrote:
> Can someone fill me in on ClamAV a little bit, the engine hasn't been
> updated in a long time, but the virus signatures appear very recent.
> Who is updating the signatures? How often do they come out?
>
We use amavisd-new with TrendMicro and Cl
We've used RAV for over a year, we're a pretty small site for this list
(probably only about 300 users max) but it's worked PERFECTLY. The
updating system has never failed, and it's never failed to catch a virus,
including the morning we got slammed with about 250 bugbear messages from
our local I
I know that you have said you were using postfix, but I'd like to point
out MIMEDefang (sendmail milter). Very good software for mangling mail,
virus scanning, spam tagging, anything you can code really.
ii mimedefang 2.30-1 Electronic mail filter program
ii clamav 0.54-2
We've used RAV for over a year, we're a pretty small site for this list
(probably only about 300 users max) but it's worked PERFECTLY. The
updating system has never failed, and it's never failed to catch a virus,
including the morning we got slammed with about 250 bugbear messages from
our local I
I know that you have said you were using postfix, but I'd like to point
out MIMEDefang (sendmail milter). Very good software for mangling mail,
virus scanning, spam tagging, anything you can code really.
ii mimedefang 2.30-1 Electronic mail filter program
ii clamav 0.54-2
At 04:13 PM 3/7/2003 +0100, you wrote:
>> Yes, it's a great Romanian AV software.
>> But why not try a GPL software first -- ClamAV?
>
>I didn't take a look at ClamAV yet! I need a stable, proven-to-work solution
>which will still work fine under heavy load.
We have been using Amavis and ClamAV f
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 10:09:33AM -0800, Erick Lopez Carreon wrote:
> If found a virus, then send mail to postmaster, sender
> and receiver.
Don't do that. You generate unnecessary traffic, which is pointless and
annoying in many situations. Most recent viruses and worms use a special
technique o
At 04:13 PM 3/7/2003 +0100, you wrote:
>> Yes, it's a great Romanian AV software.
>> But why not try a GPL software first -- ClamAV?
>
>I didn't take a look at ClamAV yet! I need a stable, proven-to-work solution
>which will still work fine under heavy load.
We have been using Amavis and ClamAV f
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 10:09:33AM -0800, Erick Lopez Carreon wrote:
> If found a virus, then send mail to postmaster, sender
> and receiver.
Don't do that. You generate unnecessary traffic, which is pointless and
annoying in many situations. Most recent viruses and worms use a special
technique o
We have 60 users by server in average, and here goes
some mail statistics:
M msgsfr bytes_from msgstobytes_to msgsrej
msgsdis Mailer
10 0K 754 17445K0
0 *file*
3 3136 103034K 8465 30360K0
0 amavis
5 9271
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 04:13:30PM +0100, Markus Welsch wrote:
> >Yes, it's a great Romanian AV software.
> >But why not try a GPL software first -- ClamAV?
>
> I didn't take a look at ClamAV yet! I need a stable, proven-to-work
> solution which will still work fine under heavy load.
>
I use Am
We have 60 users by server in average, and here goes
some mail statistics:
M msgsfr bytes_from msgstobytes_to msgsrej
msgsdis Mailer
10 0K 754 17445K0
0 *file*
3 3136 103034K 8465 30360K0
0 amavis
5 9271
Can someone fill me in on ClamAV a little bit, the engine hasn't been
updated in a long time, but the virus signatures appear very recent.
Who is updating the signatures? How often do they come out?
--
C. R. Oldham
Director of Technology
NCA CASI
I already use amavis + clamav for our servers and
works fine.I have 9 months using clamav and his virus
data base is update one o two times in a week.
That sounds great. So could you give us a bit of a short review, like how much
mail traffic those servers have to handle, etc.
I already use amavis + clamav for our servers and
works fine.I have 9 months using clamav and his virus
data base is update one o two times in a week.
--- Markus Welsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, it's a great Romanian AV software.
> > But why not try a GPL software first -- ClamAV?
>
>
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 04:13:30PM +0100, Markus Welsch wrote:
> >Yes, it's a great Romanian AV software.
> >But why not try a GPL software first -- ClamAV?
>
> I didn't take a look at ClamAV yet! I need a stable, proven-to-work
> solution which will still work fine under heavy load.
>
I use Am
Yes, it's a great Romanian AV software.
But why not try a GPL software first -- ClamAV?
I didn't take a look at ClamAV yet! I need a stable, proven-to-work solution
which will still work fine under heavy load.
Markus Welsch wrote:
Hi,
I've found
RAV Antivirus
(http://www.ravantivirus.com/pages/showproduct.php?p=21)
but I never heard of that one before! From the first view it looks
amazing - so if somebody has experience with that one post please! Of
course also post your personal recommendation
Well I don't think the price is too bad for a ISP. The clamav engine seems to be
last updated 21-Nov-2002 ... quite a while and it's not v1.0 yet.
How many users are you providing antivirus for ?
Which MTA are you using ?
It is a bit pricy. I have used http://clamav.elektrapro.com/ with great
s
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 03:03:16PM +0100, Markus Welsch wrote:
> RAV Antivirus
> (http://www.ravantivirus.com/pages/showproduct.php?p=21)
Yes, it's a great Romanian AV software.
But why not try a GPL software first -- ClamAV?
Marcin
On Friday 07 March 2003 14:03, Markus Welsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've found
>
> RAV Antivirus
> (http://www.ravantivirus.com/pages/showproduct.php?p=21)
>
>
> but I never heard of that one before! From the first view it looks amazing
> - so if somebody has experience with that one post ple
Can someone fill me in on ClamAV a little bit, the engine hasn't been
updated in a long time, but the virus signatures appear very recent.
Who is updating the signatures? How often do they come out?
--
C. R. Oldham
Director of Technology
NCA CASI
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
I already use amavis + clamav for our servers and
works fine.I have 9 months using clamav and his virus
data base is update one o two times in a week.
That sounds great. So could you give us a bit of a short review, like how much
mail traffic those servers have to handle, etc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
I already use amavis + clamav for our servers and
works fine.I have 9 months using clamav and his virus
data base is update one o two times in a week.
--- Markus Welsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, it's a great Romanian AV software.
> > But why not try a GPL software first -- ClamAV?
>
>
Yes, it's a great Romanian AV software.
But why not try a GPL software first -- ClamAV?
I didn't take a look at ClamAV yet! I need a stable, proven-to-work solution
which will still work fine under heavy load.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Markus Welsch wrote:
Hi,
I've found
RAV Antivirus
(http://www.ravantivirus.com/pages/showproduct.php?p=21)
but I never heard of that one before! From the first view it looks
amazing - so if somebody has experience with that one post please! Of
course also post your personal recommendati
Well I don't think the price is too bad for a ISP. The clamav engine seems to be
last updated 21-Nov-2002 ... quite a while and it's not v1.0 yet.
How many users are you providing antivirus for ?
Which MTA are you using ?
It is a bit pricy. I have used http://clamav.elektrapro.com/ with great
s
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 03:03:16PM +0100, Markus Welsch wrote:
> RAV Antivirus
> (http://www.ravantivirus.com/pages/showproduct.php?p=21)
Yes, it's a great Romanian AV software.
But why not try a GPL software first -- ClamAV?
Marcin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
On Friday 07 March 2003 14:03, Markus Welsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've found
>
> RAV Antivirus
> (http://www.ravantivirus.com/pages/showproduct.php?p=21)
>
>
> but I never heard of that one before! From the first view it looks amazing
> - so if somebody has experience with that one post ple
42 matches
Mail list logo
