Cameron Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can almost guarantee that you will see a performance increase. Also
> note that you don't have to change to postfix. You can configure
> sendmail to use whatever local delivery agent you want (ie. something
> like maildrop http://www.flounder.net/~mr
Cameron Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can almost guarantee that you will see a performance increase. Also
> note that you don't have to change to postfix. You can configure
> sendmail to use whatever local delivery agent you want (ie. something
> like maildrop http://www.flounder.net/~m
> This is one thing I had meant to look into. I have disabled procmail on
> postfix/maildir sites to this point because by default postfix delivers to
> mbox format folders ... I know it supports maildir just need to do the
> reading.
home_mailbox = Maildir/
Works like a dream.
- Jeff
--
> This is one thing I had meant to look into. I have disabled procmail on
> postfix/maildir sites to this point because by default postfix delivers to
> mbox format folders ... I know it supports maildir just need to do the
> reading.
home_mailbox = Maildir/
Works like a dream.
- Jeff
--
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 06:44:56PM -0400, Fraser Campbell wrote:
>
> > Understandable. Sounds like a case for maildir...(and courier-imap if you
> > can handle
> > a sealed server).
>
> Are you saying this because of the insecurity of the IMAP protocol
> (plain-text authentication and transfers)
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 06:44:56PM -0400, Fraser Campbell wrote:
>
> > Understandable. Sounds like a case for maildir...(and courier-imap if you can
>handle
> > a sealed server).
>
> Are you saying this because of the insecurity of the IMAP protocol
> (plain-text authentication and transfers) o
Cameron Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can almost guarantee that you will see a performance increase. Also
> note that you don't have to change to postfix. You can configure
> sendmail to use whatever local delivery agent you want (ie. something
> like maildrop http://www.flounder.net/~mr
JPS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We use sendmail WITH maildir at my site. Mailbox delivery is not a function of
> of the MTA per se. At least in the case of sendmail, it is handled by the
> local
> delivery agent (procmail in our case).
This is one thing I had meant to look into. I have disab
JPS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We use sendmail WITH maildir at my site. Mailbox delivery is not a function of
> of the MTA per se. At least in the case of sendmail, it is handled by the local
> delivery agent (procmail in our case).
This is one thing I had meant to look into. I have disable
Cameron Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can almost guarantee that you will see a performance increase. Also
> note that you don't have to change to postfix. You can configure
> sendmail to use whatever local delivery agent you want (ie. something
> like maildrop http://www.flounder.net/~m
We use sendmail WITH maildir at my site. Mailbox delivery is not a function of
of the MTA per se. At least in the case of sendmail, it is handled by the local
delivery agent (procmail in our case).
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 11:19:48AM -0400, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a client who is
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.05.15 10:33]:
> I have a client who is using a sendmail system with uw-imap. They are having
> fairly serious performance problems ... load rarely goes below 2, ssh login
> takes about 20 seconds (this is a P3 500).
>
> The CPU hog seems to be imapd. Some users have ver
Hi,
I have a client who is using a sendmail system with uw-imap. They are having
fairly serious performance problems ... load rarely goes below 2, ssh login
takes about 20 seconds (this is a P3 500).
The CPU hog seems to be imapd. Some users have very large mail folders
(Sent-items particularly
We use sendmail WITH maildir at my site. Mailbox delivery is not a function of
of the MTA per se. At least in the case of sendmail, it is handled by the local
delivery agent (procmail in our case).
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 11:19:48AM -0400, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a client who is
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.05.15 10:33]:
> I have a client who is using a sendmail system with uw-imap. They are having
> fairly serious performance problems ... load rarely goes below 2, ssh login
> takes about 20 seconds (this is a P3 500).
>
> The CPU hog seems to be imapd. Some users have ve
Hi,
I have a client who is using a sendmail system with uw-imap. They are having
fairly serious performance problems ... load rarely goes below 2, ssh login
takes about 20 seconds (this is a P3 500).
The CPU hog seems to be imapd. Some users have very large mail folders
(Sent-items particularl
16 matches
Mail list logo
