On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 07:34:22PM -0400, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> On May 2, 2003 01:31 am, Tarragon Allen wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2 May 2003 02:42 pm, Cameron Moore wrote:
> > > MUAs that don't suck (or ones that just suck less[1]) have a
> > > "reply-to-list" feature so you can reply to whoever you
On May 2, 2003 02:08 am, Art Sackett wrote:
> Using mutt, I poke the L (shifted L) to reply to the list. I suppose that r
> (unshifted r) would work, but I haven't tried it, because to reply to a
> list the appropriate command is the L.
>
> My mail reader works just fine, yours doesn't. Is it the
On May 2, 2003 01:31 am, Tarragon Allen wrote:
> On Fri, 2 May 2003 02:42 pm, Cameron Moore wrote:
> > MUAs that don't suck (or ones that just suck less[1]) have a
> > "reply-to-list" feature so you can reply to whoever you want to
> > regardless of what the stupid reply-to tag says.
>
> Funny you
On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 10:19:38AM +0200, Kay-Michael Voit wrote:
> I think 1) has been discussed a few times...
>
> BUT FULL ACK TO 2)!!
* top post, and
* waaay too many exclamation points.
I'm afraid you've rather damaged your argument.
--
Nathan Norman - Incanus Networking mailto:[
I think 1) has been discussed a few times...
BUT FULL ACK TO 2)!!
TA> 1) has any thought been put in place to moderate all posts from
TA> non-subscribers and new subscribers? It will add a little bit of management
TA> time but would cut out a huge amount of the spam this list receives (
On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 02:49:44PM +1000, Tarragon Allen wrote:
> On Fri, 2 May 2003 02:20 pm, Art Sackett wrote:
> > On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 09:00:18AM +1000, Tarragon Allen wrote:
> >
> > 8< snip >8
8< snip >8
> > It's an interesting bit of logic, blaming the list server software for not
> > wo
On Fri, 2 May 2003 02:42 pm, Cameron Moore wrote:
> MUAs that don't suck (or ones that just suck less[1]) have a
> "reply-to-list" feature so you can reply to whoever you want to
> regardless of what the stupid reply-to tag says.
Funny you should mention it, KMail actually does have this option, i
On Fri, 2 May 2003 02:16 pm, Mark Lijftogt wrote:
> And yet again I agree with Russel. Guess I don't say it that often..
> If I compare the amount of mails that contain a complaint (debian-isp,
> security etc) with the amount of spam (or mail sent blindly).. it's a tough
> call to make.
Well, Russ
On Fri, 2 May 2003 02:20 pm, Art Sackett wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 09:00:18AM +1000, Tarragon Allen wrote:
>
> 8< snip >8
>
> > 2) could the goddamn reply address be set to go back to the LIST rather
> > than to the original sender? I don't know how many times I've clicked
> > Reply, typed o
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Russell Coker) [2003.05.01 22:46]:
> On Fri, 2 May 2003 09:00, Tarragon Allen wrote:
> > 2) could the goddamn reply address be set to go back to the LIST rather
> > than to the original sender? I don't know how many times I've clicked
> > Reply, typed out a message, and only re
On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 09:00:18AM +1000, Tarragon Allen wrote:
8< snip >8
> 2) could the goddamn reply address be set to go back to the LIST rather than
> to the original sender? I don't know how many times I've clicked Reply, typed
> out a message, and only realised at the last second that it
And yet again I agree with Russel. Guess I don't say it that often..
If I compare the amount of mails that contain a complaint (debian-isp,
security etc) with the amount of spam (or mail sent blindly).. it's a tough
call to make.
In every setup of the mailinglist you will find points that can't
On Fri, 2 May 2003 09:00, Tarragon Allen wrote:
> 2) could the goddamn reply address be set to go back to the LIST rather
> than to the original sender? I don't know how many times I've clicked
> Reply, typed out a message, and only realised at the last second that it's
> going to go direct to the
On Thu, 1 May 2003 10:05 pm, Mark Lijftogt wrote:
> The translations: "help my online army grow, I am a little dwarf, so help
> me quick. click *on-url*. Join up with me and my army.".
>
> Cute :-) (but it's wrong).
[Spam/Whatever it was SNIPped]
Just wondering a couple of things about the manage
The translations: "help my online army grow, I am a little dwarf, so help me
quick. click *on-url*. Join up with me and my army.".
Cute :-) (but it's wrong).
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 11:04:55PM +0200, Dwarf wrote:
> Resent-From: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
> X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/13655
help mijn online leger te groeien, ik ben een
dwergje dus help mij snel
klik hier http://www.kingsofchaos.com/page.php?id=421275
meld je aan bij mijn leger
tot ziens
dwarf
16 matches
Mail list logo
