On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 10:00:59AM -0700, Simon Tennant wrote:
> > Multiply that by 2500 and that's 75G of
> > data transfer, it would be 2 hours of network transfer on 100baseT if you
> > didn't have timeouts and retransmits. Of course with that load you would
> > have heaps of timeouts and it wo
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 11:57:14AM +0300, Catalin Ciocoiu wrote:
> What filesystem can be used for file sharing ?? Is NFS ok ???
You havent got that much a choice - NFS is not a good solution
but one of the most used - autofs/nfs
> What kind of authentification can be used in this network ?
No
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 10:00:59AM -0700, Simon Tennant wrote:
> > Multiply that by 2500 and that's 75G of
> > data transfer, it would be 2 hours of network transfer on 100baseT if you
> > didn't have timeouts and retransmits. Of course with that load you would
> > have heaps of timeouts and it w
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 11:57:14AM +0300, Catalin Ciocoiu wrote:
> What filesystem can be used for file sharing ?? Is NFS ok ???
You havent got that much a choice - NFS is not a good solution
but one of the most used - autofs/nfs
> What kind of authentification can be used in this network ?
N
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, Catalin Ciocoiu wrote:
>In a slashdot articol somebody lace a interesing question
>What is the best solution for a network width 2500 Linux WorkStation ?
>I proposed a diskless workstation sollution becose is very robust
>sollution.
>Is it a good sollu
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, Catalin Ciocoiu wrote:
>In a slashdot articol somebody lace a interesing question
>What is the best solution for a network width 2500 Linux WorkStation ?
>I proposed a diskless workstation sollution becose is very robust
>sollution.
>Is it a good sollu
> Multiply that by 2500 and that's 75G of
> data transfer, it would be 2 hours of network transfer on 100baseT if you
> didn't have timeouts and retransmits. Of course with that load you would
> have heaps of timeouts and it would take much longer...
Catalan, The Pre-Boot eXecution Environment (P
> Multiply that by 2500 and that's 75G of
> data transfer, it would be 2 hours of network transfer on 100baseT if you
> didn't have timeouts and retransmits. Of course with that load you would
> have heaps of timeouts and it would take much longer...
Catalan, The Pre-Boot eXecution Environment (
Russell Coker wrote:
>
> On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, Catalin Ciocoiu wrote:
> >In a slashdot articol somebody lace a interesing question
> >What is the best solution for a network width 2500 Linux WorkStation ?
> >I proposed a diskless workstation sollution becose is very ro
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, Catalin Ciocoiu wrote:
>In a slashdot articol somebody lace a interesing question
>What is the best solution for a network width 2500 Linux WorkStation ?
>I proposed a diskless workstation sollution becose is very robust
>sollution.
>Is it a good sollu
Russell Coker wrote:
>
> On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, Catalin Ciocoiu wrote:
> >In a slashdot articol somebody lace a interesing question
> >What is the best solution for a network width 2500 Linux WorkStation ?
> >I proposed a diskless workstation sollution becose is very ro
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, Catalin Ciocoiu wrote:
>In a slashdot articol somebody lace a interesing question
>What is the best solution for a network width 2500 Linux WorkStation ?
>I proposed a diskless workstation sollution becose is very robust
>sollution.
>Is it a good sollu
In a slashdot articol somebody lace a interesing question
What is the best solution for a network width 2500 Linux WorkStation ?
I proposed a diskless workstation sollution becose is very robust
sollution.
Is it a good sollution
What filesystem can be used for file sharing ?? Is NFS ok
In a slashdot articol somebody lace a interesing question
What is the best solution for a network width 2500 Linux WorkStation ?
I proposed a diskless workstation sollution becose is very robust
sollution.
Is it a good sollution
What filesystem can be used for file sharing ?? Is NFS ok
14 matches
Mail list logo
