Hi,
On Sat, 21.02.2004 at 00:23:26 +0100, Adam ENDRODI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since the license prohibits distributing binary packages built
> from modified source, you must rely on other methods of
> installation. (On the other hand, once done, it's done for ever;
> see the next point).
On Sat, 24.01.2004 at 11:59:18 +1100, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of the worst aspects of spam is the way much of it uses
> forged sender addresses. AOL is hoping to stir up some organized
> resistance to the practice of address forgery through a new
> e-mail protocol called
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 07:16:38PM +0100, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 at 10:28:03 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I am just installing Woody on a Compaq Proliant DL320 server (PIII
I'm trying to get an old proliant 5500 up as well ;-)
> > 1.13GHz), and the various Compaq
Hi,
[ slightly re-formatting this ]
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 11:52:43AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Jan 2003 11:38:42 +0200, Serkan Hamarat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >We're using radiusd-freeradius package. Our access servers are happy.
> Unfortunately, radiusd-freeradius has been pu
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 11:45:21PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> When you've had a repair-man from the vendor use a hammer to install a CPU you
> learn to accept that any hardware can be broken no matter how well it's
> installed.
did he also use a chainsaw to cut his finger nails?
> Yes.
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 10:35:37AM -0800, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 06:56:34PM +0100, ? ? wrote:
> > About performance - IDE still uses a lot of the CPU
> now that most servers are far faster than that, we're talking about
> what, 1% or maybe 2% of the CPU?
on m
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 10:00:07AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> no, there is at least one other unix nameserver that reads them. NSD.
ok - taken already. I've skimmed their web pages but wasn't overly
fascinated in an instant. But I'll expect to keep an eye on it.
> there have been no ar
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 06:55:52PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Nov 2002 17:53, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > There is only one Unix way to use them (fortunately), and that's BIND.
> There is also nsd. I've spent about 10 minutes playing with nsd and it looks
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 11:54:21AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 07:43:26PM -, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
> > Craig Sanders writes:
> > > nobody with more than a handful of domains is going to throw everything
> > > away and convert to a new nameserver program
> > Five
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 01:42:14PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 08:55:41PM -0500, bda wrote:
> > Whereas yours is entirely the usual "BIND RULES DJB SUX0RS!" variety.
> actually, if you bothered looking, you'd find that i've said "bind
> sucks" on numerous occasions.
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 11:54:21AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 07:43:26PM -, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
> > Craig Sanders writes:
> > > nobody with more than a handful of domains is going to throw everything
> > > away and convert to a new nameserver program
> > Five
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 01:42:14PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 08:55:41PM -0500, bda wrote:
> > Whereas yours is entirely the usual "BIND RULES DJB SUX0RS!" variety.
> actually, if you bothered looking, you'd find that i've said "bind
> sucks" on numerous occasions.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:21:04AM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> For dnscache, this technique means you'll have separate caches for the
> different IPs you want to answer from. This may or may not be a problem.
You would configure one of them to be a slave to the other
("FORWARDONLY"). If al
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 09:12:02PM +0100, Andraz Sraka wrote:
> I'm trying to install InterScan VirusWall 3.7 on one woody box, for
I've recently installed Trend's InterScan on a BSD box using
their Linux emu, but overall found the following problems
with the Trend software:
- They insi
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 06:08:13PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:51, Adriano Nagelschmidt Rodrigues wrote:
> > I think the idea here is to have a file format that can be easily updated
> > by scripts. For example, a script can monitor a cluster of web servers and
> > c
Hello,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 02:55:08PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> if djb actually gave a damn about providing a viable replacement for
> bind then he'd climb down off his pedestal and implement native support
> for bind-style configuration and zone files in djbdns. not a
> translator, not
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 11:55:53PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> Many people recommended DJBDNS (both on and off list). I have read the
> following paper which leads me to believe that DJBDNS is slow and has other
> deficiencies. Brad is someone I have a lot of faith in, so I am not e
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:21:04AM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> For dnscache, this technique means you'll have separate caches for the
> different IPs you want to answer from. This may or may not be a problem.
You would configure one of them to be a slave to the other
("FORWARDONLY"). If al
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 09:12:02PM +0100, Andraz Sraka wrote:
> I'm trying to install InterScan VirusWall 3.7 on one woody box, for
I've recently installed Trend's InterScan on a BSD box using
their Linux emu, but overall found the following problems
with the Trend software:
- They insi
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 11:27:24PM +0100, jernej horvat wrote:
> Bigger systems can't afford to change or experiment with sw.
this is not strictly DNS related, but this statement is obviously
wrong:
- Bigger systems do have R&D staff (or at least should have) that
can experiment with sof
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 11:17:04PM +0100, jernej horvat wrote:
> If only djb's sw would be free so ppl could just download a binary package
> for their OS. (i would love to type 'apt-get install djbdns' one day)
that would be fine, but I won't hold my breath.
> "BIND 9 is now fully mu
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 06:08:13PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:51, Adriano Nagelschmidt Rodrigues wrote:
> > I think the idea here is to have a file format that can be easily updated
> > by scripts. For example, a script can monitor a cluster of web servers and
> > c
Hello,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 02:55:08PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> if djb actually gave a damn about providing a viable replacement for
> bind then he'd climb down off his pedestal and implement native support
> for bind-style configuration and zone files in djbdns. not a
> translator, not
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 11:55:53PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> Many people recommended DJBDNS (both on and off list). I have read the
> following paper which leads me to believe that DJBDNS is slow and has other
> deficiencies. Brad is someone I have a lot of faith in, so I am not e
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 11:27:24PM +0100, jernej horvat wrote:
> Bigger systems can't afford to change or experiment with sw.
this is not strictly DNS related, but this statement is obviously
wrong:
- Bigger systems do have R&D staff (or at least should have) that
can experiment with sof
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 11:17:04PM +0100, jernej horvat wrote:
> If only djb's sw would be free so ppl could just download a binary package
> for their OS. (i would love to type 'apt-get install djbdns' one day)
that would be fine, but I won't hold my breath.
> "BIND 9 is now fully mu
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 09:37:00AM -0700, C. R. Oldham wrote:
> Well, some of us do need Oracle for business reasons. And while I'm an
> opensource advocate and choose opensource technology whenever it makes
alter that to "whenever possible" for me, please.
> sense, Oracle is a darned goo
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 07:34:14PM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 09:06:29AM +1000, Jason Lim wrote:
> > I would be interested to see where you get evidence for your statement:
> >
> > "simply, the cost of mantaining a debian box is
> > lower than running a redhat bo
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 09:37:00AM -0700, C. R. Oldham wrote:
> Well, some of us do need Oracle for business reasons. And while I'm an
> opensource advocate and choose opensource technology whenever it makes
alter that to "whenever possible" for me, please.
> sense, Oracle is a darned go
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 07:34:14PM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 09:06:29AM +1000, Jason Lim wrote:
> > I would be interested to see where you get evidence for your statement:
> >
> > "simply, the cost of mantaining a debian box is
> > lower than running a redhat b
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 09:15:07AM -0700, brian moore wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 07:07:31PM +1000, Jason Lim wrote:
> > officially support Debian. From a commercial perspective, what happens if
> > your tech support department calls up the vendor asking for some
> > assistance, and a
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 09:15:07AM -0700, brian moore wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 07:07:31PM +1000, Jason Lim wrote:
> > officially support Debian. From a commercial perspective, what happens if
> > your tech support department calls up the vendor asking for some
> > assistance, and
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 10:22:21AM -0600, Georg Lehner wrote:
> [ explanation about mail storage mechanisms clipped ]
> dpkg-reconfigure maildelivery
sounds ok, but the original list was imho missing:
"maildir++"
(for quota support).
Best,
--Toni++
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 03:29:22PM +0100, Robert Waldner wrote:
> The only problem with a setup like this is, that it´s exploitable by
> spammers, as they can set whatever they wnat in To: or Bcc: and deliver
> it into the box, the local mailer only sees the mails coming from
> local
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 02:46:54PM +0100, Robert Waldner wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Jan 2001 00:03:17 +1100, Jeremy Lunn writes:
> >On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 01:12:23PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> >> > > Does your ISP offer some kind of smtp-queuing? We do (mail is put into
> >> > > a queue,
35 matches
Mail list logo
