On Sat, 11 Aug 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Aug 2001 16:10, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> > I'm looking for good solution for big, scalabale mailserver installation,
> > for 500,000 accounts and more...
> >
> > As for now I think:
> > - sharng N
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > LMTP would be the best if talking about Cyrus).
> > It should support LDAP database.
>
> Postfix supports both of these. It is an *awesome* MTA.
>
You've surprised me a little. I was always thinking postfix is just
another MTA, nothing more...
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Charl Matthee wrote:
> If you are willing to spend the money I can recommend you use CommuniGate
> Pro (Stalker Software, www.stalker.com). It is a fast and very scalable
> mail server (It does SMTP, POP3, IMAP, etc.).
>
> We run a free webmail sevice and our original appli
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Kevin J. Menard, Jr. wrote:
> Hey Przemyslaw,
>
>
> Sunday, August 05, 2001, 10:10:13 AM, you wrote:
>
>
> PW> However, AFAIK it can be done only with Cyrus with its IMAP Aggregator, or
> PW> with qmail-ldap + Courier-IMAP...
>
> Perdition (http://www.ca.us.vergenet.net
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > However, AFAIK it can be done only with Cyrus with its IMAP Aggregator, or
> > with qmail-ldap + Courier-IMAP...
>
> You ought to check out Scalemail, which is being developed expressly for
> this purpose. It is a combination of Courier POP/IMAP
I'm looking for good solution for big, scalabale mailserver installation,
for 500,000 accounts and more...
As for now I think:
- sharng NFS-mounted mail storage is not so good idea.
- scaling can be done by partitioning mail storage between servers (with
a little less avialabilty risk).
How
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Fabrizio Tivano wrote:
>
> Expecially if you have a dinamic PHP site, for me, MySQL and PHP, is the
> better and faster solution.
> If you take a look at http://www.mysql.com you can see all about.
> ... another one, last day i see on a newspaper also NASA migrate to M
I've found the following strange thing:
black:~# lsof | wc -l
1826
black:~# more /proc/sys/fs/file-nr
409635138192
Why is the number of file handles in use (3513) so high, comparing to the
size of lsof report ?
What are all those file handles used for ?
Any suggestions welcome..
-
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Gerard MacNeil wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:30:46 +0200 (CEST), Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, ARAKI Yasuhiro wrote:
> >
> > > Florian,
> > >
> > >
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, ARAKI Yasuhiro wrote:
> Florian,
>
> I suggest you to check mod_throttle(http://www.snert.com/Software/mod_throttle/) or
>mod_bandwidth(http://www.cohprog.com).
> Both modules has not been debianized yet.
Huh ? They are in apache packages !
czajnik@earth:~$ dpkg -L apa
What's the best way to limit particulat 's bandwidth usage ?
I tried to use mod_throttle, but...
I didn't check it deeply yet, but I guess it only can insert delay between
subsequent request handling.
Each request itself is handled at full bandwidth , isn't it ?
So it can only limit _average_ ba
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, staf wagemakers wrote:
> > I don't need persistent HTTP connections - I need persistent connections
> > from my web application. That's why I need each session to be continued on
> > the same host where it started.
>
> That is exactly what LVS does, it even works with https
What's the best way to limit particulat 's bandwidth usage ?
I tried to use mod_throttle, but...
I didn't check it deeply yet, but I guess it only can insert delay between
subsequent request handling.
Each request itself is handled at full bandwidth , isn't it ?
So it can only limit _average_ b
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, staf wagemakers wrote:
> > I don't need persistent HTTP connections - I need persistent connections
> > from my web application. That's why I need each session to be continued on
> > the same host where it started.
>
> That is exactly what LVS does, it even works with http
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, ARAKI Yasuhiro wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > session will come to the same machine in the cluster. This requires load
> > ballancing in 7th layer, so LVS doesn't help much.
>
> check libapache-mod-backhand.
Someone already pointed me on it in my private mail
. Looks _very_ inter
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, staf wagemakers wrote:
> LVS supports persistent connections ( see the webpage for more information)
> which works well in most cases.
I don't need persistent HTTP connections - I need persistent connections
from my web application. That's why I need each session to be cont
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Eric Jennings wrote:
> >I need to build a scalable webserver based on Apache. I'm not sure yet if
> >the application requires persistent TCP connections. If so, it will
> >require that after starting session all subsequent HTTP request in this
> >session will come to the sam
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, ARAKI Yasuhiro wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > session will come to the same machine in the cluster. This requires load
> > ballancing in 7th layer, so LVS doesn't help much.
>
> check libapache-mod-backhand.
Someone already pointed me on it in my private mail
. Looks _very_ inte
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, staf wagemakers wrote:
> LVS supports persistent connections ( see the webpage for more information)
> which works well in most cases.
I don't need persistent HTTP connections - I need persistent connections
from my web application. That's why I need each session to be con
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Eric Jennings wrote:
> >I need to build a scalable webserver based on Apache. I'm not sure yet if
> >the application requires persistent TCP connections. If so, it will
> >require that after starting session all subsequent HTTP request in this
> >session will come to the sa
I need to build a scalable webserver based on Apache. I'm not sure yet if
the application requires persistent TCP connections. If so, it will
require that after starting session all subsequent HTTP request in this
session will come to the same machine in the cluster. This requires load
ballancing
I need to build a scalable webserver based on Apache. I'm not sure yet if
the application requires persistent TCP connections. If so, it will
require that after starting session all subsequent HTTP request in this
session will come to the same machine in the cluster. This requires load
ballancing
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
> > I use Apache 1.3.19 + php4.0.5 from Woody in chrooted enviroment.
> > My problem is actually I can't force Apache to drop core files.
> > I've added ulimit -c unlimited to /etc/init.d/apache, and set
> > CoreDumpDirectory to some world writeable dir.
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
> > I use Apache 1.3.19 + php4.0.5 from Woody in chrooted enviroment.
> > My problem is actually I can't force Apache to drop core files.
> > I've added ulimit -c unlimited to /etc/init.d/apache, and set
> > CoreDumpDirectory to some world writeable dir
Hello !
I have noticed the following lines in Apache's error.log:
[Fri Jun 29 17:35:41 2001] [notice] child pid 18786 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Jun 29 17:35:54 2001] [notice] child pid 20229 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)
I've strace'd Apache - the child processes dies after
> smbclient //server/share -U user%password -c "cd location\of\data;mget *"
>
> Then is says :
>
> Get file file1.txt?
>
> and this will then stop it from working in a script that is a cronjob. Any
> ideas on how I can get
> it to just get the files and not ask anything?
>
From man smbclie
Hello !
I have noticed the following lines in Apache's error.log:
[Fri Jun 29 17:35:41 2001] [notice] child pid 18786 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Jun 29 17:35:54 2001] [notice] child pid 20229 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)
I've strace'd Apache - the child processes dies afte
> smbclient //server/share -U user%password -c "cd location\of\data;mget *"
>
> Then is says :
>
> Get file file1.txt?
>
> and this will then stop it from working in a script that is a cronjob. Any ideas on
>how I can get
> it to just get the files and not ask anything?
>
From man smbclie
1. Curently I use zmailer zmailer-ssl 2.99.53pre1 (installed from deb),
but I have problem with scheduler - it's dying almost everyday with
segfault.
Is this a known issue ?
In the scheduler's log I've found:
action='failed5.'
what does it mean ?
Also:
scheduler: unlink(../queue/D/^<90>0$): N
1. Curently I use zmailer zmailer-ssl 2.99.53pre1 (installed from deb),
but I have problem with scheduler - it's dying almost everyday with
segfault.
Is this a known issue ?
In the scheduler's log I've found:
action='failed5.'
what does it mean ?
Also:
scheduler: unlink(../queue/D/^<90>0$):
How can I do it with Apache ?
-=Czaj-nick=-
How can I do it with Apache ?
-=Czaj-nick=-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Jeremy Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 02:59:00PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> > Of course, I know...
> > But our middle-tier will be developed using C++ , AFAIK.
> > That's why I asked about c-client library...
>
> I would be p
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Jeremy Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 01:26:09PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> > Thanx, I didn't know this feature... Acctually, I'm not so familiar with
> > IMAP protocol yet...
>
> Depending what language you use you won
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Jeremy Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 02:59:00PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> > Of course, I know...
> > But our middle-tier will be developed using C++ , AFAIK.
> > That's why I asked about c-client library...
>
> I would be
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
> Another thing, do the webmail systems use directory notifications? With
> directory notifications the application can be informed by the kernel
> when new files are created. The IMAP protocol supports announcing new
> mail to the client. If the m
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Jeremy Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 01:26:09PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> > Thanx, I didn't know this feature... Acctually, I'm not so familiar with
> > IMAP protocol yet...
>
> Depending what language you use you won
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
> Another thing, do the webmail systems use directory notifications? With
> directory notifications the application can be informed by the kernel
> when new files are created. The IMAP protocol supports announcing new
> mail to the client. If the
Is it possible to run perl 5.6 iwth Potato without upgrading 50% of the
system ? I've tried to build debs from Woody, but they fails during ndbm
tests...
-=Czaj-nick=-
Is it possible to run perl 5.6 iwth Potato without upgrading 50% of the
system ? I've tried to build debs from Woody, but they fails during ndbm
tests...
-=Czaj-nick=-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are going to develop web-mail system, that's capable of handling
relatively high loads. I know, there are many open source web-mail systems
, but they doesn't satisfy me. Almost every falls into one of two
cateogries: php based, using imap; perl cgi based, using IMAP or direct
filesystem acces
We are going to develop web-mail system, that's capable of handling
relatively high loads. I know, there are many open source web-mail systems
, but they doesn't satisfy me. Almost every falls into one of two
cateogries: php based, using imap; perl cgi based, using IMAP or direct
filesystem acce
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Chris Wagner wrote:
> I'm sorry, but ROFLMAO!!!
It's sad and (sometimes) funny, that I have to work with those people ;)
We are just changing our admin. He was a real mistake :|
Now it's all funny for me, but It costed me time, lots of time...
> >It' solved, there were 2
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Chris Wagner wrote:
> I'm sorry, but ROFLMAO!!!
It's sad and (sometimes) funny, that I have to work with those people ;)
We are just changing our admin. He was a real mistake :|
Now it's all funny for me, but It costed me time, lots of time...
> >It' solved, there were
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 09:41:54PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> > Anyway, my problem seems to be hardware:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ more /proc/misc
> > Segmentation fault
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
>
> s
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 09:41:54PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> > Anyway, my problem seems to be hardware:
> >
> > czajnik@earth:~$ more /proc/misc
> > Segmentation fault
> > czajnik@earth:~$
>
> s
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 May 2001 19:49, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> > Hmm, I use qmail almost everywhere, but friend asked me for some help with
> > zmailer. Almost everything is done, but also we need ability to send mails
> > to al
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 May 2001 19:49, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> > Hmm, I use qmail almost everywhere, but friend asked me for some help with
> > zmailer. Almost everything is done, but also we need ability to send mails
> > to al
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 08:47:38PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 30 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Aren't you traveling several rfc1149 links?
> > >
&
e the reply arrived ?
I get it even when pinging my Cisco 1601 router, which is connected
directly (I don't care 3com SSII 1100 now)
-=Czaj-nick=-
> On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 03:24:39PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> >
> > Look at this:
> >
> > [EMAIL PR
Hmm, I use qmail almost everywhere, but friend asked me for some help with
zmailer. Almost everything is done, but also we need ability to send mails
to all our customers - all accounts in all virt domains. What's the
easiest solution with zmailer ?
-=Czaj-nick=-
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 08:47:38PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 30 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Aren't you traveling several rfc1149 links?
> > >
&
e the reply arrived ?
I get it even when pinging my Cisco 1601 router, which is connected
directly (I don't care 3com SSII 1100 now)
-=Czaj-nick=-
> On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 03:24:39PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> >
> > Look at this:
> >
> > czajn
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Ken Seefried wrote:
>
> I think that you can get this if you have an MP kernel compiled without
> "Enhanced Real Time Clock" support. The default clock driver apparently
> isn't MP-safe.
Thx, I'll check it tomorrow :).
Hmm, I use qmail almost everywhere, but friend asked me for some help with
zmailer. Almost everything is done, but also we need ability to send mails
to all our customers - all accounts in all virt domains. What's the
easiest solution with zmailer ?
-=Czaj-nick=-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Ken Seefried wrote:
>
> I think that you can get this if you have an MP kernel compiled without
> "Enhanced Real Time Clock" support. The default clock driver apparently
> isn't MP-safe.
Thx, I'll check it tomorrow :).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Look at this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping 156.17.209.1
PING 156.17.209.1 (156.17.209.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 156.17.209.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=247 time=5427.7 ms
64 bytes from 156.17.209.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=247 time=23.2 ms
64 bytes from 156.17.209.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=247 time=429492829.5 ms
Look at this:
czajnik@earth:~$ ping 156.17.209.1
PING 156.17.209.1 (156.17.209.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 156.17.209.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=247 time=5427.7 ms
64 bytes from 156.17.209.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=247 time=23.2 ms
64 bytes from 156.17.209.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=247 time=429492829.5 ms
On Sun, 27 May 2001, Peter Billson wrote:
> Whoops... helps if I post *to* the list too!
>
> > Yes the limit is still the usual 2Gb. The limit is actually with ext2, i
> > believe, although I'm not sure.
>
> The limit is in the kernel, not the ext2 file system, otherwise 2.4.x
> wouldn't be
On Sun, 27 May 2001, Peter Billson wrote:
> Whoops... helps if I post *to* the list too!
>
> > Yes the limit is still the usual 2Gb. The limit is actually with ext2, i
> > believe, although I'm not sure.
>
> The limit is in the kernel, not the ext2 file system, otherwise 2.4.x
> wouldn't be
What is the maximum file size in 2.2.19 kernel ?
Still 2GB ?
Is it ext2 limitations , or ?
Will ReiserFS have the same limit using 2.2.19 kernel ?
-=Czaj-nick=-
What is the maximum file size in 2.2.19 kernel ?
Still 2GB ?
Is it ext2 limitations , or ?
Will ReiserFS have the same limit using 2.2.19 kernel ?
-=Czaj-nick=-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I get the following exception starting tomcat. What can cause this error ?
Tomcat starts and seems to work (at least exampels work properly)
TIA
-=Czaj-nick=-
Starting tomcat. Check logs/tomcat.log for error messages
org.apache.xerces.validators.datatype.InvalidDatatypeFacetException:
org/ap
I get the following exception starting tomcat. What can cause this error ?
Tomcat starts and seems to work (at least exampels work properly)
TIA
-=Czaj-nick=-
Starting tomcat. Check logs/tomcat.log for error messages
org.apache.xerces.validators.datatype.InvalidDatatypeFacetException:
org/a
On Sat, 19 May 2001, Hector Castillo wrote:
> It's impossible to move the pages to the original directory (there are
> a lot users and a lot pages), and the suEXEC is necessary.
> My question is: żdoes anybody know how to recompile the Debian source
> of apache-ssl and which files wo
On Sat, 19 May 2001, Hector Castillo wrote:
> It's impossible to move the pages to the original directory (there are
> a lot users and a lot pages), and the suEXEC is necessary.
> My question is: żdoes anybody know how to recompile the Debian source
> of apache-ssl and which files w
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Krzysztof Mazurczyk wrote:
> And third problem may be with dependencies of packets. Kernel suggests use
> 2.4.x
> of modutils, modutils depends on libc6 2.2.x and newer libc6 depends on
> libdb2 2.7.7
> or similar.
> But when I listalled libdb2 taken form woody lastly, syslo
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Krzysztof Mazurczyk wrote:
> And third problem may be with dependencies of packets. Kernel suggests use
> 2.4.x
> of modutils, modutils depends on libc6 2.2.x and newer libc6 depends on
> libdb2 2.7.7
> or similar.
> But when I listalled libdb2 taken form woody lastly, sysl
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Tech Support wrote:
> > What patch ? Isn't DAC960 module already included in kernel ?
> Yes Mylex DAC960 support is in the kernel but this isn't the
> controller that these machines used. Dell uses (or at least in these
> machines) a controller made by Adaptec which is alt
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Tech Support wrote:
> Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> > What configuration ?
> > I want to run it on dual processor machine.
> Our web servers are single processor Pentium III on a Asus
> motherboard. I also run 2.4.2 with SMP on a couple of Dell
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Tech Support wrote:
> I can't comment on the ResierFS or AcceleRAID support but I can
> comment on the stability of the 2.4.2 kernel.
> We have been running 2.4.2 on our Web servers which also do DNS, mail,
> mysql and FTP for 50 days now, without a problem. The 2.4.x ke
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Tech Support wrote:
> > What patch ? Isn't DAC960 module already included in kernel ?
> Yes Mylex DAC960 support is in the kernel but this isn't the
> controller that these machines used. Dell uses (or at least in these
> machines) a controller made by Adaptec which is al
I'm just setting up new box - large mail server,
dual Pentium, STL2 motherboard, Mylex AccleRAID.
I'd like to try with kernel 2.4.x + ResierFS, but I worry a little about
it's maturity. Is it really stable now ?
Can anyone here write about his/her experiences with 2.4.x ?
Does 2.4.x kernels su
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Tech Support wrote:
> Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> > What configuration ?
> > I want to run it on dual processor machine.
> Our web servers are single processor Pentium III on a Asus
> motherboard. I also run 2.4.2 with SMP on a couple of Dell
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Tech Support wrote:
> I can't comment on the ResierFS or AcceleRAID support but I can
> comment on the stability of the 2.4.2 kernel.
> We have been running 2.4.2 on our Web servers which also do DNS, mail,
> mysql and FTP for 50 days now, without a problem. The 2.4.x k
I'm just setting up new box - large mail server,
dual Pentium, STL2 motherboard, Mylex AccleRAID.
I'd like to try with kernel 2.4.x + ResierFS, but I worry a little about
it's maturity. Is it really stable now ?
Can anyone here write about his/her experiences with 2.4.x ?
Does 2.4.x kernels s
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Friday 20 April 2001 11:40, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> > I have problems booting my system from new HD.
> >
> > I've got:
> > - ABIT KT7
> > - Seagate connected to first channel (as /dev/hda)
> >
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Friday 20 April 2001 11:40, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> > I have problems booting my system from new HD.
> >
> > I've got:
> > - ABIT KT7
> > - Seagate connected to first channel (as /dev/hda)
>
I have problems booting my system from new HD.
I've got:
- ABIT KT7
- Seagate connected to first channel (as /dev/hda)
- CD-ROM as /dev/hdc
- new disk (DTLA 307030) connected to HPT370 as /dev/hde
I want to boot my system form /dev/hde, ( I want to be able to take
I have problems booting my system from new HD.
I've got:
- ABIT KT7
- Seagate connected to first channel (as /dev/hda)
- CD-ROM as /dev/hdc
- new disk (DTLA 307030) connected to HPT370 as /dev/hde
I want to boot my system form /dev/hde, ( I want to be able to tak
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
> > I want to recommend you IMP. You can set IMAP server on firewall and
> > IMP/Horde.
>
> I've been playing with SilkyMail (http://www.cyrusoft.com/silkymail), which
> is an enhanced version of IMP. It's under the GPL, but Cyrusoft are
> offe
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
> > I want to recommend you IMP. You can set IMAP server on firewall and
> > IMP/Horde.
>
> I've been playing with SilkyMail (http://www.cyrusoft.com/silkymail), which
> is an enhanced version of IMP. It's under the GPL, but Cyrusoft are
> off
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Simon Tennant wrote:
> I run arpwatch. It watches for new arp requests and mails me the
> following:
>
> Subject: new station (w192.z064003150.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net)
>Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 16:49:59 -0800
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arpwatch)
>
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Simon Tennant wrote:
> I run arpwatch. It watches for new arp requests and mails me the
> following:
>
> Subject: new station (w192.z064003150.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net)
>Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 16:49:59 -0800
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arpwatch)
>
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Marcel Hicking wrote:
> Przemyslaw Wegrzyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16 Mar 2001, at
> 10:17:
> > On 15 Mar 2001, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> > > Allen Ahoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Is there a distribution that will ch
On 15 Mar 2001, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> Allen Ahoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Is there a distribution that will cheaply replace a load balancer?
> > e.g.
> > for web servers.
> > LVS, ...?
>
> man ipmasqadm ... you'll see this:
>
>Redirect all web traffic to internals ho
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Marcel Hicking wrote:
> Przemyslaw Wegrzyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16 Mar 2001, at
> 10:17:
> > On 15 Mar 2001, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> > > Allen Ahoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Is there a distribution that will ch
On 15 Mar 2001, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> Allen Ahoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Is there a distribution that will cheaply replace a load balancer?
> > e.g.
> > for web servers.
> > LVS, ...?
>
> man ipmasqadm ... you'll see this:
>
>Redirect all web traffic to internals h
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Eric Jennings wrote:
> >From what I read today, InterBase (which is free nowadays; see e.g.
> >http://www.ibphoenix.com/) has multi-level transactions.
>
>
> Thanks for the info... I'll have to check that out.
>
> Anybody else have positive/negative experiences with Inter
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Eric Jennings wrote:
> If only they'd open up the source completely, I'd move all of my web
> app development immediately to it from PostgreSQL/MySQL.
Me too. But I don't think it's possible in the near future. I would be
very surprised, if they decided to do so...
They do
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:27:32 -0800, Eric Jennings wrote:
> > I can't comment on the stability of the product within a production
> > environment, but I was very pleased with the multi-level transaction
> > system,
>
> >From what I read today,
Has anyone here experience with Sybase ASE 11.0.3.3 on Linux ?
I'm wondering, if it is a good choice for production enviroment... It has
a little strange license:
"You are allowed to install and use the Software for free as long as you
operate the Software at all times only with the Open Source
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Eric Jennings wrote:
> >From what I read today, InterBase (which is free nowadays; see e.g.
> >http://www.ibphoenix.com/) has multi-level transactions.
>
>
> Thanks for the info... I'll have to check that out.
>
> Anybody else have positive/negative experiences with Inte
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Eric Jennings wrote:
> If only they'd open up the source completely, I'd move all of my web
> app development immediately to it from PostgreSQL/MySQL.
Me too. But I don't think it's possible in the near future. I would be
very surprised, if they decided to do so...
They d
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:27:32 -0800, Eric Jennings wrote:
> > I can't comment on the stability of the product within a production
> > environment, but I was very pleased with the multi-level transaction
> > system,
>
> >From what I read today
Has anyone here experience with Sybase ASE 11.0.3.3 on Linux ?
I'm wondering, if it is a good choice for production enviroment... It has
a little strange license:
"You are allowed to install and use the Software for free as long as you
operate the Software at all times only with the Open Source
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Monday 05 March 2001 18:33, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> > Is there any page comparing the performance/features of ReiserFS , JFS,
> > XFS ?
> >
> > Which one would you suggest for maildirs on heavy loaded server ?
>
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Monday 05 March 2001 18:33, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> > Is there any page comparing the performance/features of ReiserFS , JFS,
> > XFS ?
> >
> > Which one would you suggest for maildirs on heavy loaded server ?
>
Is there any page comparing the performance/features of ReiserFS , JFS,
XFS ?
Which one would you suggest for maildirs on heavy loaded server ?
Is there any page comparing the performance/features of ReiserFS , JFS,
XFS ?
Which one would you suggest for maildirs on heavy loaded server ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
100 matches
Mail list logo
