Hi all,
In running up a new DSL connection today, I came across an "interesting"
situation w.r.t. DHCP and point-to-point links.
The planned implementation is to have the Netgear DG632 ADSL modem do
the PPPoA but pass (by DHCP) the single fixed-IP address to the Linux
box on the ethernet (this is
Hi all,
As part of a project I'm involved in, we need to deploy a new server
(ia32, FWIW: running Debian "sarge") to run a MySQL database (SME-sized,
moderate complexity but not particularly large) + Java Application.
I figure that upgradability probably isn't a big issue here, as the
obvious pat
Hi all,
As part of a project I'm involved in, we need to deploy a new server
(ia32, FWIW: running Debian "sarge") to run a MySQL database (SME-sized,
moderate complexity but not particularly large) + Java Application.
I figure that upgradability probably isn't a big issue here, as the
obvious pat
Hi,
I've got a copule of woody systems and am trying to build a stock(i.e.
from kernel.org) 2.4.21 kernel for one of them on the other (both are
currently running 2.2 - but that shouldn't matter, right?).
No matter what I try, I always get "cramfs: wrong magic" and a panic when
it's unable to mo
Hi,
I've got a copule of woody systems and am trying to build a stock(i.e.
from kernel.org) 2.4.21 kernel for one of them on the other (both are
currently running 2.2 - but that shouldn't matter, right?).
No matter what I try, I always get "cramfs: wrong magic" and a panic when
it's unable to mo
I'm trying to install Sympa on a Debian(woody) machine but not getting
far :-(
I've tracked it down to this line in install-pg-db, which is called from
the postinst script:
# Get a sysid
my $usesysid = $dbh->do("SELECT MAX(usesysid) + 1 FROM pg_shadow");
That always returns 1 (and a subsequent
I'm trying to install Sympa on a Debian(woody) machine but not getting
far :-(
I've tracked it down to this line in install-pg-db, which is called from
the postinst script:
# Get a sysid
my $usesysid = $dbh->do("SELECT MAX(usesysid) + 1 FROM pg_shadow");
That always returns 1 (and a subsequent
On Mon, 19 May 2003, Mark Lijftogt wrote:
> Hope this helps,
>
> Cheers,
> Mark
>
>
> maps_rbl_domains = sbl.spamhaus.org,
>
>
> Quote from spamhaus.org (from their faq):
> Once you have set up your mail server to use sbl.spamhaus.org, you can test
> to see if the SBL blocking is working by s
I've set up postfix on a Woody machine as a low-volume server (like it's
getting *really* low volume). All appears well except the amount of mail
slipping through the maps_rbl config, which is pretty draconian - like
this:
#
# OK, we are being pretty aggresive here
maps_rbl_domains = proxies
Yes, I will RTFM ;-)
Meanwhile, does anyone have any experiences with building and/or running
IRRd (the one at http://www.ird.net ) on woody?
Thanks,
Neale.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you Craing and Ilya - I now see where I was approaching this from
the wrong direction.
The overall framework I'm trying to get happening is to use a
supplementary group for the users and files to be maintained outside
/etc/postfix and some "simple" glue-scripts to move the modified files
in
Hi Craig,
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Craig Sanders wrote:
[...]
> the 660 permissions on the /etc/radius/radius.users file allow the admin
> group to edit it and check it in to RCS.
Could you elaborate on this please?
I started by ading a group "mailadm", the theory being that all the
relevant files
Thank you Craing and Ilya - I now see where I was approaching this from
the wrong direction.
The overall framework I'm trying to get happening is to use a
supplementary group for the users and files to be maintained outside
/etc/postfix and some "simple" glue-scripts to move the modified files
i
Hi Craig,
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Craig Sanders wrote:
[...]
> the 660 permissions on the /etc/radius/radius.users file allow the admin
> group to edit it and check it in to RCS.
Could you elaborate on this please?
I started by ading a group "mailadm", the theory being that all the
relevant files
Greetings all,
With particular relevance to potato...
I see that by default the files in /etc/postfix are owner: group
root:root. This obviously doesn't lend itself to the contents thereof
being admin'ed by admins who don't otherwise enjoy the total freedom of
the system (nor is it best for thos
Greetings all,
With particular relevance to potato...
I see that by default the files in /etc/postfix are owner: group
root:root. This obviously doesn't lend itself to the contents thereof
being admin'ed by admins who don't otherwise enjoy the total freedom of
the system (nor is it best for tho
/pptp-traceroute.patch.gz
It was hacked into the Debian package traceroute_1.4a12-3 by Neale
Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IMPORTANT: Please do not worry Herbert Xu (maintainer of the official
Debian traceroute package) about this hacked package.
Neale Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTE
/pptp-traceroute.patch.gz
It was hacked into the Debian package traceroute_1.4a12-3 by Neale
Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IMPORTANT: Please do not worry Herbert Xu (maintainer of the official
Debian traceroute package) about this hacked package.
Neale Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Duane Powers wrote:
> I need to make some serious changes to my kernels, on various servers at
> my location, I have everything from
> 486's up to 1.2Gig boxes, so rather than compiling on the cpu and
> RAM-challenged boxes, I'd like to make kernels
> on one of my more power
On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Grischa Schuering wrote:
> we customized a new apache-ssl deb package, by adding a module called
> zmod to it. We need this module here in Germany for statistical
> analysis.
> Now every time a new apache-ssl version (or security fix) is available
> our package is overwritten
On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Duane Powers wrote:
> I need to make some serious changes to my kernels, on various servers at
> my location, I have everything from
> 486's up to 1.2Gig boxes, so rather than compiling on the cpu and
> RAM-challenged boxes, I'd like to make kernels
> on one of my more powe
On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Grischa Schuering wrote:
> we customized a new apache-ssl deb package, by adding a module called
> zmod to it. We need this module here in Germany for statistical
> analysis.
> Now every time a new apache-ssl version (or security fix) is available
> our package is overwritten
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thursday 08 March 2001 04:29, Neale Banks wrote:
[...]
> > Then starts the slippery slope... the libldap2 in unstable depends on
> > libsasl7, which in its turn recommends libsasl-modules (the only
> > consolation here is that li
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thursday 08 March 2001 04:29, Neale Banks wrote:
[...]
> > Then starts the slippery slope... the libldap2 in unstable depends on
> > libsasl7, which in its turn recommends libsasl-modules (the only
> > consolation here is that li
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
[...]
> > Any suggestions other than building all of those for potato (and no, I
> > don't want to upgrade yet).
>
> I have .deb's of the latest LDAP stuff for Potato. I didn't build them
> though. Hopefully we can establish some sort of official reposi
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
[...]
> > Any suggestions other than building all of those for potato (and no, I
> > don't want to upgrade yet).
>
> I have .deb's of the latest LDAP stuff for Potato. I didn't build them
> though. Hopefully we can establish some sort of official repos
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
[...]
> I think that we need some separate projects for maintaining outdated
> distributions of Debian. There's no way I'll touch slink but I have a great
> need for potato to be usable with the latest stuff.
Inded, as well as (unsuccessfully) attemptin
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
[...]
> I think that we need some separate projects for maintaining outdated
> distributions of Debian. There's no way I'll touch slink but I have a great
> need for potato to be usable with the latest stuff.
Inded, as well as (unsuccessfully) attempti
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Adrian Nims wrote:
> Does anybody know a web site where I can see route announcement ? I
> want to see from outside if my routes are announced correctly or not.
There's a pretty good list at http://neptune.dti.ad.jp/
HTH,
Neale.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, [iso-8859-1] Áts Attila wrote:
> have any of you ever heard of or used a RAID controller
> that is capable of "RAIDing" with IDE disks? Is there
> suuport for a card like this in Linux?
A couple of years ago, I saw a hardware RAID controller which presented to
the host SCSI as
On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, [iso-8859-1] Áts Attila wrote:
> have any of you ever heard of or used a RAID controller
> that is capable of "RAIDing" with IDE disks? Is there
> suuport for a card like this in Linux?
A couple of years ago, I saw a hardware RAID controller which presented to
the host SCSI a
Greetings all,
A Compaq DL380 system has been built, ready for installation of Debian
(i.e. potato).
However, this system has a Smart Array 221 controller with two 9GB SCSI
drives - the controller is setup for RAID-1 giving me a single virtual
drive of almost 9GB. No performance cautions here, g
Greetings all,
A Compaq DL380 system has been built, ready for installation of Debian
(i.e. potato).
However, this system has a Smart Array 221 controller with two 9GB SCSI
drives - the controller is setup for RAID-1 giving me a single virtual
drive of almost 9GB. No performance cautions here,
[...]
> > I also think you'll need ip based vhosts in Apache to make it listen to a
> 2nd NIC.
>
> can I ask for some help on this ? i need apache to listen to both NICs
No, you shouldn't need ip-based vhosts (which are inherently a Bad Thing,
but that's another thread). Looking at
http://www.
[...]
> > I also think you'll need ip based vhosts in Apache to make it listen to a
> 2nd NIC.
>
> can I ask for some help on this ? i need apache to listen to both NICs
No, you shouldn't need ip-based vhosts (which are inherently a Bad Thing,
but that's another thread). Looking at
http://www
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, ridgey wrote:
> What would you recommend for Squid proxy hardware, for a machine thats
> running transparent and has approximately up to 80 dialups pumping requests
> through it?
>
> Current machine has a drive setup of:
>
> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, ridgey wrote:
> What would you recommend for Squid proxy hardware, for a machine thats
> running transparent and has approximately up to 80 dialups pumping requests
> through it?
>
> Current machine has a drive setup of:
>
> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounte
On Mon, 29 May 2000, Andrei D. Caraman wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 09:18:01AM +1000, Neale Banks wrote:
>
> > Greetings all,
> >
> > A search around failed to turn up an obvious whois server, either as part
> > of Debian or even just source code - did I miss
Greetings all,
A search around failed to turn up an obvious whois server, either as part
of Debian or even just source code - did I miss something?
Anyone got a pointer to this? Similarly, any pointers to relevant
HOWTO/FAQ/etc docs?
Thanks,
Neale.
Answering my own question again...
On Sat, 29 Apr 2000, Neale Banks wrote:
[...]
> The main queston: should I be concerned about the "timeout after DATA"
> messages?
Turned out to be a path-MTU-discovery problem. See:
http://msgs.securepoint.com/cgi-bin/get/postfix99
Greetings,
I've run up a new box with potato and using postfix for smtp relay. All
looks well, however in mail.log there are many entries like:
Apr 28 23:35:33 foo postfix/smtpd[1617]: connect from unknown[209.35.126.76]
Apr 28 23:35:34 foo postfix/smtpd[1617]: 48751B8014:
client=unknown[209.35
Does anyone have any experience with hacking Debian's scripts to get a
system happily running networking without portmapper, or even without
inetd? Any issues to be wary of in this area?
The motivations:
* portmapper: I can't see what need I have for it - therefore it just
becomes a security li
Thanks to all who responded - potato appears to be happily running on this
box now :-)
No special arrangements were required - we just ran the automagic setup
software and selected "other" for the o/s.
regarding:
> Now I have a specific query: the onboard ethernet is identified in
> /proc/pci as
On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Chris Wagner wrote:
> LOL! Oh, like trying to write to a non-existent memory location? :)
Exactly ;-) First a cute quote:
---8<---
When solving a "panic" you must first ask yourself what you were
doing that cou
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Wilson Tuma wrote:
> Would somebody be kind enough to tell me how to make my machine recognize
> 256Meg of RAM.
>
> When I added the ram and did top and did see only 64Meg.
Any reasonably recent kernel (even 2.0.3x) _should_ be able to recognise
this without specific assistan
Greetings all,
Any recommendations on a *reliable* ethernet card to spec for a Debian
(potato) box to be deployed as a dedicated mail exchanger?
Not thinking so much of the fastest, as something that will reliably pump
data.
10/100, Full-duplex, PCI prefered (what else would you use in a "seriou
Greeetings all,
I need to come up with some reasons/whatever to justify continuing to use
Debian - but this needs to be in suit-friendly terms ;-)
One of Debian's key strengths is obviously its packaging system, and the
consequent low cost of administration. Anyone got any pointers to
articles/w
47 matches
Mail list logo
