Try mod_dosevasive on a google search if you're looking for something to
protect apache
- Original Message -
From: "Chad Adlawan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, 20 January, 2005 11:45 PM
Subject: good DoS / DDoS detection tool
> Good Day!
>
> Can anyone recommend a good DoS /
> > I was wondering... are you guys concerned about the latest PHP
> > vulnerabilities, which affect the Debian stable 4.1.2?
>
> It seems that woodys php4 package isn't affected.
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2004/12/msg00090.html
>
> Norbert
This is excellent news! However, I wonde
>
> --On Wednesday, December 22, 2004 23:42 +0100 Philipp Kern
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > In my opinion it is not worth to backport PHP 4.3 to stable as sarge
> > *should*
> > be released as soon as security team support is available.
>
> Sarge is taking an extremely long time to get out th
>
> I've been using backport's 4.3.10 packages in production without
> problems. i had problems with Invision power board but that was fixed by
> upgrading to the latest version of Zend.
>
> I am a little disappointed with debian on this update, i thought we
> would have got an update by now
Litt
> We're all worried. There are 2 threads going on in debian-security
> about this issue:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2004/12/msg00044.html
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2004/12/msg00047.html
<...>
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2004/12/msg00054.html
>
Just r
Hi all,
I was wondering... are you guys concerned about the latest PHP
vulnerabilities, which affect the Debian stable 4.1.2?
How are you handling it? Debian Security Team still hasn't released any
patches, so concerned and worried about this.
Or perhaps you guys think there is no need to worry?
> the basic rule of thumb is: "if i'm likely to need it to boot or if it's
> essential for what the machine is supposed to do, then it gets compiled
in to
> the kernel. otherwise as a module".
>
> craig
Agree completely. In or case, we also compile in the 3ware RAID stuff, a
few common NIC drive
From: "Johnno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, 14 October, 2004 4:34 PM
Subject: Networking Between eth0 & eth1
> Hello,
>
> I am running Debian Woody and have two ethernet cards in the computer..
>
> eth0 is connected to the internet, eth1 is connected to my local
net
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 12:06:13AM -0400, Chris Wagner wrote:
> > If ur looking for a fast RAID product that's reasonably priced I'ld
take a
> > look at NetCell's SyncRAID product (http://www.netcell.com/) which
uses a 64
> > bit RAID-3 variant they call RAID XL. It got a good review from Tom'
> We have:
> ns1.lctc.org
> ns2.lctc.org
>
> ns2.lctc.org is (aparently) down. It is in a locked and alarmed
building.
>
> How is this effecting users of our DNS?
This shouldn't affect them... that is the idea of having a minimum of 2
DNS servers, so that in the event one failed, the other will co
> If you have to go through one 4xx messages to send a message then it
takes
> twice the network bandwidth to send a spam and more than twice the
effort
> (queues have to be maintained etc). If you were to require more than
one 4xx
> message and a longer time-out then it makes it even more work f
> I have another question - what is the optimal max. keep-alive time?
Because as I
> can see from Apache's /server-status page on our server, there are
usually about
> 10-15 processes in state "S" (Sending Reply) and another 40-50 in "K"
> (keepalive). In have lowered this time from 15 seconds to
> I'm currently using backports.org and dotdeb.org in production.
>
I am also using backports.org and have been for a long time on quite a few
servers. Admittedly we only use it for things like Spamassassin and
nothing hugely mission critical like kernels, but so far the packages have
been of h
Well, most of the ASUS motherboards we use come with a Power option that
allows you to "resume previous status" after power loss.
That means if the power was off to start with, and there is a power
failure, it stays off.
It if had power beforehand, it reboots back up.
Hope that helps!
Jas
how about using rbash? Only does the shell part, and it is not very hard
to break out of the jail, but then again, allowing shell when you think
users are going to purposely try to break it isn't a good idea...
how about using rbash? Only does the shell part, and it is not very hard
to break out of the jail, but then again, allowing shell when you think
users are going to purposely try to break it isn't a good idea...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
>
> most ISPs (and mail service providers like yahoo and hotmail), for
instance,
> will never have SPF records in their DNS. they may use SPF checking on
their
> own MX servers, but they won't have the records in their DNS. their
users have
> legitimate needs to send mail using their address fro
>
> most ISPs (and mail service providers like yahoo and hotmail), for
instance,
> will never have SPF records in their DNS. they may use SPF checking on
their
> own MX servers, but they won't have the records in their DNS. their
users have
> legitimate needs to send mail using their address fro
> I've used (through notespam) for my own private email, the following
> lists:
> Visi (relays.visi.com);
> ORDB (relays.ordb.org);
> SpamCop (bl.spamcop.net);
> dorkslayers (orbs.dorkslayers.com).
Pretty good list... ecept for dorkslayers.
In general, for an ISP or hosting provider (or anyone w
> I've used (through notespam) for my own private email, the following
> lists:
> Visi (relays.visi.com);
> ORDB (relays.ordb.org);
> SpamCop (bl.spamcop.net);
> dorkslayers (orbs.dorkslayers.com).
Pretty good list... ecept for dorkslayers.
In general, for an ISP or hosting provider (or anyone w
>
> We're running Debian with a custom 2.4.26 kernel on a couple of dual
> Xeon's, with apache 1.3.x without any problem. I'll admit that these
> are ligtly loaded servers for now, but we've done some stress testing
> before they went into production and never saw this problem.
>
> Maarten
Di
>
> We're running Debian with a custom 2.4.26 kernel on a couple of dual
> Xeon's, with apache 1.3.x without any problem. I'll admit that these
> are ligtly loaded servers for now, but we've done some stress testing
> before they went into production and never saw this problem.
>
> Maarten
Di
m and hyperthreading?!
Jas
- Original Message -
From: "gilles.hanotel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, 16 June, 2004 6:49 AM
Subject: Re: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?
> Hi Jason,
>
> > Unfort
m and hyperthreading?!
Jas
- Original Message -
From: "gilles.hanotel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, 16 June, 2004 6:49 AM
Subject: Re: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?
> Hi Jason,
>
> > Unfort
Hi Gilles ,
Unfortunately, I never did. The solution was to disable Hyperthreading
altogether unfortunately.
Perhaps others have had more luck?
- Original Message -
From: "gilles.hanotel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, 16 June, 2004 5:13 AM
Subject: Re: Int
Hi Gilles ,
Unfortunately, I never did. The solution was to disable Hyperthreading
altogether unfortunately.
Perhaps others have had more luck?
- Original Message -
From: "gilles.hanotel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, 16 June, 2004 5:13 AM
Subject: Re: Int
The biggest problem you will have is with the DNS.
Set 1 of the DNS servers to the new IP, and keep 1 behind.
Make sure the TTL is low... very low.
Then, make sure the new DNS server on the new IP address is up and running
with the old DNS server on the old IP (if possible), so at all times ther
The biggest problem you will have is with the DNS.
Set 1 of the DNS servers to the new IP, and keep 1 behind.
Make sure the TTL is low... very low.
Then, make sure the new DNS server on the new IP address is up and running
with the old DNS server on the old IP (if possible), so at all times ther
> > Checking `lkm'... You have 3 process hidden for readdir command
> > You have 3 process hidden for ps command
> > Warning: Possible LKM Trojan installed
> >
> > Sometimes chkrootkit returns nothing detected and every time rkhunter
> > tells me nothing is wrong. Is this a false positive w
> > Checking `lkm'... You have 3 process hidden for readdir command
> > You have 3 process hidden for ps command
> > Warning: Possible LKM Trojan installed
> >
> > Sometimes chkrootkit returns nothing detected and every time rkhunter
> > tells me nothing is wrong. Is this a false positive w
You have to weigh up the pros and cons of this.
Presumably lists.debian.org already uses some kind of spam filtering, such
as using ordb.org or spamcop.net or something to filter spamming IPs
outright?
Then on your end, you can run Spamassassin that will look at the content
(i presume lists.debia
You have to weigh up the pros and cons of this.
Presumably lists.debian.org already uses some kind of spam filtering, such
as using ordb.org or spamcop.net or something to filter spamming IPs
outright?
Then on your end, you can run Spamassassin that will look at the content
(i presume lists.debia
ping so aggressively... to the point that
it is running itself out of RAM for active programs to increase cache
size.
Jas
- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, 19 April, 2004 7:31 AM
Subject: bdflush or others affecting disk cache
>
ping so aggressively... to the point that
it is running itself out of RAM for active programs to increase cache
size.
Jas
- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, 19 April, 2004 7:31 AM
Subject: bdflush or others
causing it to be disk bound... causing the system to increase cache
size... causing more swap usage... etc. Anyone see this before?
- Original Message -----
From: "Donovan Baarda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, April 19
causing it to be disk bound... causing the system to increase cache
size... causing more swap usage... etc. Anyone see this before?
- Original Message -----
From: "Donovan Baarda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
Hi all,
I've been banging my head on this one for a while now on a 2.4.20 system.
Here is the output of top:
Mem: 1027212K av, 1018600K used,8612K free, 0K shrd, 70728K
buff
Swap: 2097136K av, 35556K used, 2061580K free 690140K
cached
and the output of free:
Hi all,
I've been banging my head on this one for a while now on a 2.4.20 system.
Here is the output of top:
Mem: 1027212K av, 1018600K used,8612K free, 0K shrd, 70728K
buff
Swap: 2097136K av, 35556K used, 2061580K free 690140K
cached
and the output of free:
> > If i now must remove the first harddisk (/dev/hda) the second
(/dev/hdb)
> > will be renamed to (/dev/hda) after the reboot. As i want /dev/hdb to
be
> that's EXACTLY what linux does for IDE drives. the slave drive on the
primary
> IDE controller will *always* be /dev/hdb, regardless of whet
> > If i now must remove the first harddisk (/dev/hda) the second
(/dev/hdb)
> > will be renamed to (/dev/hda) after the reboot. As i want /dev/hdb to
be
> that's EXACTLY what linux does for IDE drives. the slave drive on the
primary
> IDE controller will *always* be /dev/hdb, regardless of whet
From:
http://tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/textproc.html
try the "cut" command. Sounds like it does just what you want.
-J
- Original Message -
From: "Alexandros Papadopoulos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, 10 March, 2004 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: backup script
> On Wednesday 10 March 2
From:
http://tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/textproc.html
try the "cut" command. Sounds like it does just what you want.
-J
- Original Message -
From: "Alexandros Papadopoulos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, 10 March, 2004 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: backup script
> On W
You might also want to check out:
http://www.qmail.org/
and vpopmail Debian package.
The basic idea is that you don't use real usernames that exist on the
server, but instead create "fake" ones (such as a user called
[EMAIL PROTECTED]) just for checking pop3 email.
Do some reading... also check
You might also want to check out:
http://www.qmail.org/
and vpopmail Debian package.
The basic idea is that you don't use real usernames that exist on the
server, but instead create "fake" ones (such as a user called
[EMAIL PROTECTED]) just for checking pop3 email.
Do some reading... also check
> it basically cycles through the ip addresses pinging a host on just the
> other side of the router so it flushes the ARP cache. Does this sound
> correct or am I totally off the track here? Anyway it is all working
> now but I guess I'd like to know if what I had to do was correct or
> not?
I
> it basically cycles through the ip addresses pinging a host on just the
> other side of the router so it flushes the ARP cache. Does this sound
> correct or am I totally off the track here? Anyway it is all working
> now but I guess I'd like to know if what I had to do was correct or
> not?
I
>
> One of my hats is a junior sys admin in an academic environment. I'm
> curious as to how you know when shell users are trying to exploit a
kernel
> hole.
chkrootkit?
>
> One of my hats is a junior sys admin in an academic environment. I'm
> curious as to how you know when shell users are trying to exploit a
kernel
> hole.
chkrootkit?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> One technique that's being used a lot is to get books in electronic form
and
> put a coupld of sentences in every spam (sentences from a book will pass
> gramatical checking etc, unlike the example you posted above). Also
text
> from a book will have the right ratio of words, you will almost nev
> One technique that's being used a lot is to get books in electronic form
and
> put a coupld of sentences in every spam (sentences from a book will pass
> gramatical checking etc, unlike the example you posted above). Also
text
> from a book will have the right ratio of words, you will almost nev
> > I do not appear to be having the same problem you guys are. The
machine
> > does not have a high load, but has not exhibited any problems
> > whatsoever. Running vanilla source 2.4.23 from kernel.org.
> >
> > Are you using Debian kernel packages or vanilla source? Any other
magic
> > going on?
> > I do not appear to be having the same problem you guys are. The
machine
> > does not have a high load, but has not exhibited any problems
> > whatsoever. Running vanilla source 2.4.23 from kernel.org.
> >
> > Are you using Debian kernel packages or vanilla source? Any other
magic
> > going on?
MHz : 1495.172
> > > cache size : 256 KB
> > > fdiv_bug: no
> > > hlt_bug : no
> > > f00f_bug: no
> > > coma_bug: no
> > > fpu : yes
> > > fpu_exception : yes
> > >
: no
> > fpu : yes
> > fpu_exception : yes
> > cpuid level : 2
> > wp : yes
> > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
> > mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
> > b
t; > cpu MHz : 1495.172
> > > cache size : 256 KB
> > > fdiv_bug: no
> > > hlt_bug : no
> > > f00f_bug: no
> > > coma_bug: no
> > > fpu : yes
> > > fpu_exception : yes
> &g
u_exception : yes
> > cpuid level : 2
> > wp : yes
> > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
> > mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
> > bogomips: 2981.88
> >
> > The ht in t
no
> > coma_bug: no
> > fpu : yes
> > fpu_exception : yes
> > cpuid level : 2
> > wp : yes
> > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
> > mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mm
> El mar, 16-12-2003 a las 12:39, Jason Lim escribió:
> > Just noticed one more thing... it appears to be Apache causing the
super
> > high load (among other programs running) when SMP is compiled into the
> > kernel, and with a bunch of errors in syslog:
> >
&g
yes
> cpuid level : 2
> wp : yes
> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
> mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
> bogomips: 2981.88
>
> The ht in the flags section tells me hyper threading is being
u_exception : yes
> > cpuid level : 2
> > wp : yes
> > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
> > mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
> > bogomips: 2981.88
> >
> > The ht in t
> El mar, 16-12-2003 a las 12:39, Jason Lim escribió:
> > Just noticed one more thing... it appears to be Apache causing the
super
> > high load (among other programs running) when SMP is compiled into the
> > kernel, and with a bunch of errors in syslog:
> >
&g
gt; fpu_exception : yes
> cpuid level : 2
> wp : yes
> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
> mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
> bogomips: 2981.88
>
> The ht in the flags section tells me hy
think of a
different angle on this?
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:23 PM
Subject: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?
> Hi All...
>
> Do you guys know anything about a problem with Intel
think of a
different angle on this?
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:23 PM
Subject: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?
> Hi All...
>
> Do you guys know anything abou
Hi All...
Do you guys know anything about a problem with Intel Hyperthreading (eg.
on the Intel 2.4Ghz HT-enabled processor) that would cause the load
average to jump to over 200?
Here is the log line:
Dec 16 22:48:17 be watchdog[250]: loadavg 203 101 40 is higher than the
given threshold 200 15
Hi All...
Do you guys know anything about a problem with Intel Hyperthreading (eg.
on the Intel 2.4Ghz HT-enabled processor) that would cause the load
average to jump to over 200?
Here is the log line:
Dec 16 22:48:17 be watchdog[250]: loadavg 203 101 40 is higher than the
given threshold 200 15
I would suggest you have a look at the 3dm log file in /var/log as this
sounds like an issue in the communication between the linux disk io
buffering subsystem and the 3ware card. However, since you're just
performing the installation, i doubt you can load up 3dmd during that time
(can you?).
I would suggest you have a look at the 3dm log file in /var/log as this
sounds like an issue in the communication between the linux disk io
buffering subsystem and the 3ware card. However, since you're just
performing the installation, i doubt you can load up 3dmd during that time
(can you?).
Any good way to get around Qmail's usage of inode # as file names?
I've tried doing a simple cp before and it just doesn't work afterwards...
doens't see the files. I've seen hacks, but they don't seem to work well
and take forever to run, which can be tough, especially if you have
hundreds, if no
Any good way to get around Qmail's usage of inode # as file names?
I've tried doing a simple cp before and it just doesn't work afterwards...
doens't see the files. I've seen hacks, but they don't seem to work well
and take forever to run, which can be tough, especially if you have
hundreds, if no
We've run Realtek cards on some servers, and they've worked flawlessly for
us. We never pushed them to the absolute max, but at one point they were
pushing about 50Mbps (far for the theoretical 100Mbps... but you'll never
get that anyway).
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
We've run Realtek cards on some servers, and they've worked flawlessly for
us. We never pushed them to the absolute max, but at one point they were
pushing about 50Mbps (far for the theoretical 100Mbps... but you'll never
get that anyway).
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
Run mii-tool and see what speed your card is using first.
- Original Message -
From: "Roman Medina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 05:49 PM
Subject: Strange problem with NIC
Hi,
I'm experimenting the following problem: one Debian machine with 1
10/100 Etherne
Run mii-tool and see what speed your card is using first.
- Original Message -
From: "Roman Medina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 05:49 PM
Subject: Strange problem with NIC
Hi,
I'm experimenting the following problem: one Debian machine wi
> Cat 3 cable is the quality of 4-pair wiring used for voice connections
between PBXs and analog telephones. Turns out, it is 'good enoug' for 10
M/s Ethernet (10BaseT) but not good enough for 100 M/s or GigEnet.
>
> Cat 5 cable is also 4-pairs, but the manufacturing process is more
precise (pi
> Cat 3 cable is the quality of 4-pair wiring used for voice connections
between PBXs and analog telephones. Turns out, it is 'good enoug' for 10
M/s Ethernet (10BaseT) but not good enough for 100 M/s or GigEnet.
>
> Cat 5 cable is also 4-pairs, but the manufacturing process is more
precise (pi
Hi all,
I was wondering... what is physically different between Cat 3 (10BaseTX)
and Cat 5 cabling (100BaseTX and better)? Does Cat 3 cabling have less
wires or something? Besides looking for text written on the cable, is
there any way to know which is which?
Hope someone knows the answer to this
Hi all,
I was wondering... what is physically different between Cat 3 (10BaseTX)
and Cat 5 cabling (100BaseTX and better)? Does Cat 3 cabling have less
wires or something? Besides looking for text written on the cable, is
there any way to know which is which?
Hope someone knows the answer to this
> Given that you stated that two clients on different ISPs have the same
problem
> at the same time it seems to eliminate the possibility of a proxy.
>
> The chance of two windows machines independently having the same bug at
the
> same time seems rather low, so it seems likely to be the server at
> Given that you stated that two clients on different ISPs have the same
problem
> at the same time it seems to eliminate the possibility of a proxy.
>
> The chance of two windows machines independently having the same bug at
the
> same time seems rather low, so it seems likely to be the server at
> To sumerize the options I've found so far:
>
> a) PAM chroot
> b) rbash - restricted shell
> c) SSH2 chroot access.
>
> In this case the machine in question is a remote virtual server with
> only SSH access. So I think c) may be the go.
>
> If I had local users I guess a) or b) with a) having
> To sumerize the options I've found so far:
>
> a) PAM chroot
> b) rbash - restricted shell
> c) SSH2 chroot access.
>
> In this case the machine in question is a remote virtual server with
> only SSH access. So I think c) may be the go.
>
> If I had local users I guess a) or b) with a) having
Sincerely,
- Original Message -
From: "Maarten Vink / Interstroom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tarragon Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, 21 October, 2003 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: Moving Sites
> Tarragon Allen wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 October 2003 13:43, Rod Rodolico wrote:
> >
Sincerely,
- Original Message -
From: "Maarten Vink / Interstroom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tarragon Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, 21 October, 2003 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: Moving Sites
> Tarragon Allen wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 October 2003 13:43, Rod R
Hi Rudi,
Let us all know if this works for you, as I (and I think quite a few ppl
that run ISPs) would be interested to know if this actually works or not
:-)
Jas
- Original Message -
From: "Rudi Starcevic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, 19 October, 2003 1:54
> Hi,
>
> Just a quick question on libpam-chroot.
>
> This package is not availalbe in 'stable'.
> I've only ever used 'stable'.
>
> It should be OK to grab this package from 'testing' and use it hey ?
Usually you can't... as they have dependency problems. What you need is a
"backport" to stabl
> Anyway, I blocked it from connecting and I am trying to delete the file.
I succeded and even put it in quarentine - but it keeps recreating itself.
>
> How can I get rid of it - or find the source that is recreating it?
This is HIGHLY offtopic to this group, but anyway...
Sounds like a virus.
>
> No, I don't think this would work. You'll need a third box which will do
> the balancing (well, maybe you could get it to work but it's not
> intended this way).
>
> As I said before, the balancer doesn't have to be a fast machine -
> almost anything you can find will be sufficient.
>
Strange
- Original Message -
From: "Matias G. Lambert ( OSInet )" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, 09 September, 2003 11:10 PM
Subject: Web administration Apache - Virtual domains
> Hi, I'm looking for an apache virtual domain web admin tool.
> Does anyone know a open
From: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, 08 September, 2003 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: On SMP, getting: Message from watchdog: The system will be
rebooted because of error -3!
>
Hi all,
Recently got SMP working, but now keep getting:
Message from watchdog: The system will be rebooted because of error -3!
(note this isn't really SMP, it's intel hyperthreading...)
The system auto reboots because of this. Not sure why... doesn't appear to
be the load or anything (no co
Sincerely,
- Original Message -
From: "Guus Houtzager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, 06 September, 2003 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: SMP on Debian server with Hyperthreading
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 09:31, Jason Lim wrote:
> Please people,
>
> What is the connection between the nationality of Wietse Venema and
> people who sent spam? This is a very strange argument and more fitted
> for a discussion between kids. We are adults, we are professionals, this
> list is to discuss technicall matters (personal opinions a
> On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 02:19, Cameron L. Spitzer wrote:
> > I've been running Qmail since '98. It's got a bottleneck
> > in disk writes, but aside from that it's fast.
> > (Anybody tried running the queue in a ramdisk?
>
> Running the queue on a ramdisk would kill reliability.
Indeed, been there
- Original Message -
From: "Cameron L. Spitzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, 07 September, 2003 12:19 AM
Subject: Re: Sendmail or Qmail ? ..
> I've been running Qmail since '98. It's got a bottleneck
> in disk writes, but aside from that it's fast.
> (Anybod
r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, 06 September, 2003 5:08 PM
Subject: Re: SMP on Debian server with Hyperthreading
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 17:06, Jason Lim wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Just wondering... I've got
s
how hyperthreading works?
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, 06 September, 2003 1:06 AM
Subject: SMP on Debian server with Hyperthreading
> Hi all,
>
> Just wondering... I've go
Hi all,
Just wondering... I've got a 2.4Ghz Hyperthreading (100% it is the
hyperthreading model), and the BIOS sees it.
I then compiled the kernel... the usual, except added the SMP support
setting "Symmetric multi-processing support". Nothing else was changed.
Compiled it, liloed it... it's run
- Original Message -
From: "Craig Sanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jeremy Lunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: Debian Co-location in USA
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 01:27:04PM +1000, Jeremy Lunn wrote:
> > The level of suppo
- Original Message -
From: "Gene Grimm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Leonardo Boselli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: 14 July, 2003 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: Default Apache 404 for all sites
> Leonardo Boselli wrote:
> > I was told to set a script in php or perl that looks if in the
directory wh
1 - 100 of 639 matches
Mail list logo
