Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?

2004-06-22 Thread Adam Funk
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 12:20, Russell Coker wrote: >> This is a smarter way to do it.  Wouldn't you admit that the problem >> is not from MTAs on dynamic IP addresses, but rather from infected >> Windows machines on dynamic IP addresses? > > MTAs on dynamic addresses is an entirely different pro

Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?

2004-06-22 Thread Adam Funk
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 12:20, Russell Coker wrote: >> This is a smarter way to do it.  Wouldn't you admit that the problem >> is not from MTAs on dynamic IP addresses, but rather from infected >> Windows machines on dynamic IP addresses? > > MTAs on dynamic addresses is an entirely different pro

Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?

2004-06-22 Thread Adam Funk
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 09:11, Russell Coker wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:13, Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> reject other dyn/dialups - they should use their own ISP or mail >> server. > > I second this. > > A user has no business making direct connections to mail servers. Maybe

Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?

2004-06-22 Thread Adam Funk
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 09:11, Russell Coker wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:13, Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> reject other dyn/dialups - they should use their own ISP or mail >> server. > > I second this. > > A user has no business making direct connections to mail servers. Maybe

Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?

2004-06-22 Thread Adam Funk
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 09:11, Russell Coker wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:13, Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> reject other dyn/dialups - they should use their own ISP or mail >> server. > > I second this. > > A user has no business making direct connections to mail servers. Maybe

Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?

2004-06-22 Thread Adam Funk
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 09:11, Russell Coker wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:13, Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> reject other dyn/dialups - they should use their own ISP or mail >> server. > > I second this. > > A user has no business making direct connections to mail servers. Maybe

Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?

2004-06-19 Thread Adam Funk
On Saturday 19 June 2004 07:50, Russell Coker wrote: > By far the most false-positive entries I have had are from > postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org and abuse.rfc-ignorant.org. The That's because rfc-ignorant.org's lists aren't about spamming. They are about domains that fail to conform to certain R

Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?

2004-06-19 Thread Adam Funk
On Saturday 19 June 2004 07:50, Russell Coker wrote: > By far the most false-positive entries I have had are from > postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org and abuse.rfc-ignorant.org. The That's because rfc-ignorant.org's lists aren't about spamming. They are about domains that fail to conform to certain R