On Saturday 19 June 2004 07:50, Russell Coker wrote: > By far the most false-positive entries I have had are from > postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org and abuse.rfc-ignorant.org. The
That's because rfc-ignorant.org's lists aren't about spamming. They are about domains that fail to conform to certain RFCs. (Although I disagree with their listing of *.uk on the grounds that the UK registry allows people to withhold their private contact details from whois.)
