also sprach Chris G. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.0226 +0200]:
> Tried the windows server but had major fragmentation problems and
> a hard time keeping up with the problem. Switched to linux but
> Samba's performance seems to be sub par. (Maybe 5-10 meg/sec
> transfer rate)
That's a configura
also sprach Marc Schiffbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.0037 +0200]:
> That would indeed be a nice feature. How can I drop users CAPs on
> login?
Are there such things as user capabilities without SELinux or
GrSecurity or RSBAC?
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
Ok, I've hit a road block here. I'm trying to find the best way to
serve up 3 to 12 gig files to an office network of Win XP machines. We
have everything on a Gig E network but I can't seem to find a good file
serving solution.
Tried the windows server but had major fragmentation problems and
* martin f krafft schrieb am 26.10.04 um 23:04 Uhr:
> also sprach Marc Schiffbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.26.2233 +0200]:
> > Uups. Mea culpa. But I think this will not make it better in your
> > case. If someone creates a file he can do whatever he wants with
> > that file including removing
also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.26.2230 +0200]:
> why doi freeze up when on yahoo messenger and voice chat
because they suck?
try another software.
and please use another list.
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin f. krafft
also sprach Marc Schiffbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.26.2233 +0200]:
> Uups. Mea culpa. But I think this will not make it better in your
> case. If someone creates a file he can do whatever he wants with
> that file including removing your supervisor from the files ACL.
The merit is arguable,
why doi freeze up when on yahoo messenger and voice chat
* martin f krafft schrieb am 26.10.04 um 20:18 Uhr:
> also sprach Marc Schiffbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.26.1944 +0200]:
> > AFAIK what you want to do is not possible because Samba does not
> > support NT ACLs yet. With NT ACLs you could say "Students are not
> > allowed to change ACLs" and
also sprach Marc Schiffbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.26.1944 +0200]:
> AFAIK what you want to do is not possible because Samba does not
> support NT ACLs yet. With NT ACLs you could say "Students are not
> allowed to change ACLs" and you were done.
Uh, there is no samba. This is all Linux and
* martin f krafft schrieb am 26.10.04 um 16:21 Uhr:
> If you are good with POSIX ACLs, I would appreciate if you could
> take a look at
>
> http://people.debian.org/%7Eterpstra/message/20041026.105727.f688af8f.en.html
>
> Post your comments here, if you wish, I shall funnel the solution
> and i
Dear Dee,
Thank you for your answer and your time! I've already post my question there but they
say
that I must install qmail and vpopmail using the traditional way (not using apt-get).
I'd like to install them using apt-get but all the howtos I've read doesn't look
reliable.
qmail is working g
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 03:55, "John Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand your guys' point, and I appreciate it.What you describe
> here sounds nearly identicaly to my auto-responder. But, that may be my
> lack of knowledge of how the mail system works in general. Something about
Be
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 03:11, Fraser Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Spam does not justify spam. I have come to this realization myself only
> recently (I am, unfortunately still, a TMDA user). I can understand that
You should cease using TMDA. For reference I never respond to TMDA type
mes
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 06:29, "John Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > John C has requested that
> > the following message be removed from the archives.
>
> My apologies that my autoresponder spammed the list. I've never posted to
> the debian-isp list. Apparently someone's machine is infected w
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:58, "John Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >...spammers drown you in water?
>
> http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=metaphor
>
> >..you want respect? Earn it.
>
> If earning respect in this crowd requires being disrespectful, then I'm not
> interested.
Earning res
also sprach johon Doe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.26.1614 +0200]:
> Hi, I have some problems with fetchmail.. I fetch mail
> from different mailserver and everythings seem work
> well, here is a fetchmail's piece of log:
This is hardly a question for debian-isp. Please go to debian-user
in the fu
If you are good with POSIX ACLs, I would appreciate if you could
take a look at
http://people.debian.org/%7Eterpstra/message/20041026.105727.f688af8f.en.html
Post your comments here, if you wish, I shall funnel the solution
and important points over to the other list... (unless you tell me
not
Hi, I have some problems with fetchmail.. I fetch mail
from different mailserver and everythings seem work
well, here is a fetchmail's piece of log:
fetchmail: 6.2.5 querying mail1.isp.it (protocol POP3)
at mar 26 ott 2004 10:55:26 CEST: poll started
fetchmail: POP3< +OK mail1.isp.org POP MDaemon
18 matches
Mail list logo
