On March 30, 2003 10:34 pm, Rudi Starcevic wrote:
> In my apache error log we have alot of request's for i) default.ida and
> ii) cmd.exe
> In Linux this appears to be pretty much harmless - I think.
> It is however annoying and I'm wondering whether or not to do anything
> about it.
I used to re
On March 30, 2003 10:34 pm, Rudi Starcevic wrote:
> In my apache error log we have alot of request's for i) default.ida and
> ii) cmd.exe
> In Linux this appears to be pretty much harmless - I think.
> It is however annoying and I'm wondering whether or not to do anything
> about it.
I used to re
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 05:48:44PM +0100, mimo wrote:
> I am trying to set up FP2002SE on
> debian (unstable)
> Apache 1.3.27
> mod-frontpage-mirfak-1.6.2
> libldap2_2.0.23,libpam-ldap-140 (self build to allow TLS)
>
> fptest is a ldap user, fptest is a unix group
>
> /usr/local/frontpage/versio
I am trying to set up FP2002SE on
debian (unstable)
Apache 1.3.27
mod-frontpage-mirfak-1.6.2
libldap2_2.0.23,libpam-ldap-140 (self build to allow TLS)
fptest is a ldap user, fptest is a unix group
/usr/local/frontpage/version5.0/bin/owsadm.exe -o install -u fpadm -pw
secret -xuser nobody -xgroup
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 05:48:44PM +0100, mimo wrote:
> I am trying to set up FP2002SE on
> debian (unstable)
> Apache 1.3.27
> mod-frontpage-mirfak-1.6.2
> libldap2_2.0.23,libpam-ldap-140 (self build to allow TLS)
>
> fptest is a ldap user, fptest is a unix group
>
> /usr/local/frontpage/versio
On Friday 28 March 2003 09:24, Peter Holm wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 02:40:10 +0100, in linux.debian.isp you wrote:
> >Really?
> >
> >I tried "apt-cache search thorttle" and got nothing.
>
> right, you will not find it with apt-cache, maybe there is something
> wrong. But it´s already there:
>
>
I am trying to set up FP2002SE on
debian (unstable)
Apache 1.3.27
mod-frontpage-mirfak-1.6.2
libldap2_2.0.23,libpam-ldap-140 (self build to allow TLS)
fptest is a ldap user, fptest is a unix group
/usr/local/frontpage/version5.0/bin/owsadm.exe -o install -u fpadm -pw
secret -xuser nobody -xgroup
I personally use Proftpd. It has performed well enough for my uses.. As to
quotas.. I'm honestly not sure on that..
Well I'm also using ProFTPd currently. vsftpd offers a pretty nice performance
boosting though :-)
I do recomend switching to Bind9. There are alternatives, but Bind9 seems
to be th
We are using bind since long time and we did not have any probs with that. The
bugfixes for the most systemservices are realy quick available for debian
imho.
Okay so we will go for BIND. However I'd like to see BIND chrooted as default in
debian or at least have an easy option to. I think I'll
On Friday 28 March 2003 09:24, Peter Holm wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 02:40:10 +0100, in linux.debian.isp you wrote:
> >Really?
> >
> >I tried "apt-cache search thorttle" and got nothing.
>
> right, you will not find it with apt-cache, maybe there is something
> wrong. But it´s already there:
>
>
I personally use Proftpd. It has performed well enough for my uses.. As to
quotas.. I'm honestly not sure on that..
Well I'm also using ProFTPd currently. vsftpd offers a pretty nice performance
boosting though :-)
I do recomend switching to Bind9. There are alternatives, but Bind9 seems
to be th
We are using bind since long time and we did not have any probs with that. The
bugfixes for the most systemservices are realy quick available for debian
imho.
Okay so we will go for BIND. However I'd like to see BIND chrooted as default in
debian or at least have an easy option to. I think I'll
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 22:34, Rudi Starcevic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In my apache error log we have alot of request's for i) default.ida and
> ii) cmd.exe
[...]
> I think all I can really do is use mod_rewrite to send these request to
> another page,
> like a friendly page which tell's the hacker where
16 matches
Mail list logo