Forgot to say,
Fast fix.
Seems to be problem go away if you remove --report part...
---
Sergey "BeerBong" Polyakov
chief of WebZavod (http://www.webzavod.ru)
I submited a bug...
Bug#114864: Hanging run-parts
As maintainer wrote - such problem was in previous 1.13.3 version,
but has been corrected in current version... not well.
---
Sergey "BeerBong" Polyakov
chief of WebZavod (http://www.webzavod.ru)
- Original Message -
From: "B.C.J.O" <[EMA
I have set up a server with exiscan along with McAfee VirusScan for Linux
and it has worked quite well.
The only problem is that messages aren't delivered immediately, there are
queued until the exiscan script checks them for virus's. Exim normally
attempts to deliver mail straight away.
Apart f
Forgot to say,
Fast fix.
Seems to be problem go away if you remove --report part...
---
Sergey "BeerBong" Polyakov
chief of WebZavod (http://www.webzavod.ru)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I submited a bug...
Bug#114864: Hanging run-parts
As maintainer wrote - such problem was in previous 1.13.3 version,
but has been corrected in current version... not well.
---
Sergey "BeerBong" Polyakov
chief of WebZavod (http://www.webzavod.ru)
- Original Message -
From: "B.C.J.O" <[EM
> > > > Is that like sending in the tanks? :)
> > >
> > > I like tanks! ;)
> >
> > Not on my phoneline, thank you. ;)
>
> Why? The latest version is only an 80K deb! It's small, resource friendly,
> fast, etc.
I meant the tank. ;)
> Well the latest version of Portslave (the one that is too
On Tue, 9 Oct 2001 02:12, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > > Is that like sending in the tanks? :)
> >
> > I like tanks! ;)
>
> Not on my phoneline, thank you. ;)
Why? The latest version is only an 80K deb! It's small, resource friendly,
fast, etc.
> > Sure. AFAIK every RADIUS server in the Unix w
> > Is that like sending in the tanks? :)
>
> I like tanks! ;)
Not on my phoneline, thank you. ;)
> Sure. AFAIK every RADIUS server in the Unix world supports PAM in some way.
Cool. I've never really looked at it, as I've always thought, "oh no, that's
for like, *lots* of modems." :)
> I r
On Tue, 9 Oct 2001 01:27, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > There's nothing stopping you from running Portslave with a single dial-in
> > line!
>
> Is that like sending in the tanks? :)
I like tanks! ;)
> > If your dial-in setup is serious enough to use a RADIUS server then it's
> > big enough for Port
* This one time, at band camp, Jeff Waugh said:
> > Setting up the RADIUS server is likely to be the most difficult part of a
> > Portslave installation.
>
> Can I authenticate with PAM, etc. somehow?
>
Well, RADIUS isn't that hard. A simple radius server can auth from a
number of different 'b
> There's nothing stopping you from running Portslave with a single dial-in
> line!
Is that like sending in the tanks? :)
> If your dial-in setup is serious enough to use a RADIUS server then it's big
> enough for Portslave.
>
> Setting up the RADIUS server is likely to be the most difficult
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001 16:36, I. Forbes wrote:
> The old one ran mgetty and a pppd patched for radius
> authentication via the radius client library. The patches have not
> been updated since pppd version 2.2 and the old machine still has
> a 2.0 series kernel.
>
> I am using portslave 2000-12-24 whic
Thanks Martin,
I'll check that out. I have been able to verify that sendmail is working for
outgoing stuff by getting a form mailer working. It's just not replying by
sending to my account @ the ip address. I believe that
sendmail is configured to use my domain name but cant yet because my DNS
cha
> > > > Is that like sending in the tanks? :)
> > >
> > > I like tanks! ;)
> >
> > Not on my phoneline, thank you. ;)
>
> Why? The latest version is only an 80K deb! It's small, resource friendly,
> fast, etc.
I meant the tank. ;)
> Well the latest version of Portslave (the one that is to
On Tue, 9 Oct 2001 02:12, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > > Is that like sending in the tanks? :)
> >
> > I like tanks! ;)
>
> Not on my phoneline, thank you. ;)
Why? The latest version is only an 80K deb! It's small, resource friendly,
fast, etc.
> > Sure. AFAIK every RADIUS server in the Unix
> > Is that like sending in the tanks? :)
>
> I like tanks! ;)
Not on my phoneline, thank you. ;)
> Sure. AFAIK every RADIUS server in the Unix world supports PAM in some way.
Cool. I've never really looked at it, as I've always thought, "oh no, that's
for like, *lots* of modems." :)
> I
On Tue, 9 Oct 2001 01:27, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > There's nothing stopping you from running Portslave with a single dial-in
> > line!
>
> Is that like sending in the tanks? :)
I like tanks! ;)
> > If your dial-in setup is serious enough to use a RADIUS server then it's
> > big enough for Por
Hi.
A workaround is to change the epoch from 1/1/1990 to 1/1/2000 in the
webalizer.c sources and recompile. Credits go to Mait Vares.
Anyone know if the number of seconds from 1/1/1990 till 5/10/2001 is
something like 10^x or 2^y ? :-)
regards,
Remco.
* This one time, at band camp, Jeff Waugh said:
> > Setting up the RADIUS server is likely to be the most difficult part of a
> > Portslave installation.
>
> Can I authenticate with PAM, etc. somehow?
>
Well, RADIUS isn't that hard. A simple radius server can auth from a
number of different '
Take a look at your webalizer.current file. The second line will be
the date of the last record processed. Webalizer will not process any
files before that date to prevent duplication. I have manually changed
the date to process older log files with success.
Pete Billson
--
http://www.elbnet.c
> There's nothing stopping you from running Portslave with a single dial-in
> line!
Is that like sending in the tanks? :)
> If your dial-in setup is serious enough to use a RADIUS server then it's big
> enough for Portslave.
>
> Setting up the RADIUS server is likely to be the most difficul
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.10.08 15:36]:
> Cameron Moore wrote:
> > > I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12)
> > > English. I have several websites running on my server using
> > > Apache/1.3.9 (Unix), each site with its own config file. I have a
> > > cron to run: webaliz
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 01:01:16PM -0700, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
>
> I am guessing that there is a config option to allow longer requests. (But
> I don't see it in my manual page.)
I don't think so. I remember I had to patch it and recompile.
Marcin
--
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001 16:36, I. Forbes wrote:
> The old one ran mgetty and a pppd patched for radius
> authentication via the radius client library. The patches have not
> been updated since pppd version 2.2 and the old machine still has
> a 2.0 series kernel.
>
> I am using portslave 2000-12-24 whi
Cameron Moore wrote:
> > I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12)
> > English. I have several websites running on my server using
> > Apache/1.3.9 (Unix), each site with its own config file. I have a
> > cron to run: webalizer -c each half hour. On October
> > 4th one of
At 03:15 PM 10/8/01 -0500, Cameron Moore wrote:
>I'm seeing the exact same problem (same version of webalizer but newer
>apache). Nothing was changed on the box -- it just stopped working.
>Plenty of resources (disk, memory, etc). Seems like a webalizer bug.
>First one to figure out the problem
Hello,
After looking this problem over some more, it seems it just ignores
changes, I removed the webalizer.current file, re-ran webalizer and it
got todays stats, but when I put back my original webalizer.current file
an re-ran webalizer again it doesn't change anything, instead it ignores
129
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.10.08 13:44]:
> Hello,
> I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12) English.
> I have several websites running on my server using Apache/1.3.9 (Unix),
> each site with its own config file. I have a cron to run: webalizer -c
> each half hour. On O
Yes,
I did a tail -f /var/log/apache/virtual/opensimpx/transfer.log and I can
see traffic coming to the site.
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Matt Fair wrote:
daily stats, nothing. Apache is still recording the transfer logs, and
Are the transfers really being recorded to
/var/log/a
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Matt Fair wrote:
> daily stats, nothing. Apache is still recording the transfer logs, and
Are the transfers really being recorded to
/var/log/apache/virtual/opensimpx/transfer.log?
> 26 records (26 ignored) in 0.00 seconds
This looks like it has 26 old entries but no new o
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Martin Man wrote:
> since the beginning of september I'm sometimes getting something like
> from webalizer, though I haven't look at it
Same here. In my case, these were requests by the Code Red-type worm.
I am guessing that there is a config option to allow longer requests.
Thanks Martin,
I'll check that out. I have been able to verify that sendmail is working for
outgoing stuff by getting a form mailer working. It's just not replying by
sending to my account @ the ip address. I believe that
sendmail is configured to use my domain name but cant yet because my DNS
ch
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 01:32:59PM -0600, Matt Fair wrote:
> Hello,
> I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12) English.
> I have several websites running on my server using Apache/1.3.9 (Unix),
> each site with its own config file. I have a cron to run: webalizer -c
> ea
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 01:48:37PM -0700, Michael R. Welch wrote:
>
>
> When I remotely scan the ports I can't find smtp services. So my question is
> how do you configure sendmail to start in daemon mode on reboot. I'm new to
> debian but have some unix/linux experience as a user and super user,
Hello,
I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12) English.
I have several websites running on my server using Apache/1.3.9 (Unix),
each site with its own config file. I have a cron to run: webalizer -c
each half hour. On October 4th one of my sites got about
20,000 hits
Hi.
A workaround is to change the epoch from 1/1/1990 to 1/1/2000 in the
webalizer.c sources and recompile. Credits go to Mait Vares.
Anyone know if the number of seconds from 1/1/1990 till 5/10/2001 is
something like 10^x or 2^y ? :-)
regards,
Remco.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Noel Koethe wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Okt 2001, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > > 16310 pts/2S 0:00 \_ run-parts --report
> > > > /etc/cron.daily/
> > > > 16388 pts/2Z 0:00 \_ [man-db ]
> > > >
> > > > Every time different script, and if I run ev
Take a look at your webalizer.current file. The second line will be
the date of the last record processed. Webalizer will not process any
files before that date to prevent duplication. I have manually changed
the date to process older log files with success.
Pete Billson
--
http://www.elbnet.
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.10.08 15:36]:
> Cameron Moore wrote:
> > > I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12)
> > > English. I have several websites running on my server using
> > > Apache/1.3.9 (Unix), each site with its own config file. I have a
> > > cron to run: webali
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 01:01:16PM -0700, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
>
> I am guessing that there is a config option to allow longer requests. (But
> I don't see it in my manual page.)
I don't think so. I remember I had to patch it and recompile.
Marcin
--
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cameron Moore wrote:
> > I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12)
> > English. I have several websites running on my server using
> > Apache/1.3.9 (Unix), each site with its own config file. I have a
> > cron to run: webalizer -c each half hour. On October
> > 4th one of
At 03:15 PM 10/8/01 -0500, Cameron Moore wrote:
>I'm seeing the exact same problem (same version of webalizer but newer
>apache). Nothing was changed on the box -- it just stopped working.
>Plenty of resources (disk, memory, etc). Seems like a webalizer bug.
>First one to figure out the problem
Hello,
After looking this problem over some more, it seems it just ignores
changes, I removed the webalizer.current file, re-ran webalizer and it
got todays stats, but when I put back my original webalizer.current file
an re-ran webalizer again it doesn't change anything, instead it ignores
12
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.10.08 13:44]:
> Hello,
> I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12) English.
> I have several websites running on my server using Apache/1.3.9 (Unix),
> each site with its own config file. I have a cron to run: webalizer -c
> each half hour. On
Yes,
I did a tail -f /var/log/apache/virtual/opensimpx/transfer.log and I can
see traffic coming to the site.
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Matt Fair wrote:
>
>
>>daily stats, nothing. Apache is still recording the transfer logs, and
>>
>
> Are the transfers really being recor
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Matt Fair wrote:
> daily stats, nothing. Apache is still recording the transfer logs, and
Are the transfers really being recorded to
/var/log/apache/virtual/opensimpx/transfer.log?
> 26 records (26 ignored) in 0.00 seconds
This looks like it has 26 old entries but no new
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Martin Man wrote:
> since the beginning of september I'm sometimes getting something like
> from webalizer, though I haven't look at it
Same here. In my case, these were requests by the Code Red-type worm.
I am guessing that there is a config option to allow longer requests
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 01:32:59PM -0600, Matt Fair wrote:
> Hello,
> I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12) English.
> I have several websites running on my server using Apache/1.3.9 (Unix),
> each site with its own config file. I have a cron to run: webalizer -c
> e
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 01:48:37PM -0700, Michael R. Welch wrote:
>
>
> When I remotely scan the ports I can't find smtp services. So my question is
> how do you configure sendmail to start in daemon mode on reboot. I'm new to
> debian but have some unix/linux experience as a user and super user
On Mon, 08 Okt 2001, Christian Kurz wrote:
Hello Small,:)
> > > 16310 pts/2S 0:00 \_ run-parts --report /etc/cron.daily/
> > > 16388 pts/2Z 0:00 \_ [man-db ]
> > >
> > > Every time different script, and if I run every script manually it is
> > > completed
Hello,
I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12) English.
I have several websites running on my server using Apache/1.3.9 (Unix),
each site with its own config file. I have a cron to run: webalizer -c
each half hour. On October 4th one of my sites got about
20,000 hits
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Noel Koethe wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Okt 2001, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > > 16310 pts/2S 0:00 \_ run-parts --report /etc/cron.daily/
> > > > 16388 pts/2Z 0:00 \_ [man-db ]
> > > >
> > > > Every time different script, and if I run every scri
Hello Russell
I am busy testing a portslave server to replace my old ancient
Cyclades-Y based terminal server.
The old one ran mgetty and a pppd patched for radius
authentication via the radius client library. The patches have not
been updated since pppd version 2.2 and the old machine sti
On Mon, 08 Okt 2001, Christian Kurz wrote:
Hello Small,:)
> > > 16310 pts/2S 0:00 \_ run-parts --report /etc/cron.daily/
> > > 16388 pts/2Z 0:00 \_ [man-db ]
> > >
> > > Every time different script, and if I run every script manually it is
> > > complete
Hello Russell
I am busy testing a portslave server to replace my old ancient
Cyclades-Y based terminal server.
The old one ran mgetty and a pppd patched for radius
authentication via the radius client library. The patches have not
been updated since pppd version 2.2 and the old machine st
On Mon, 08 Okt 2001, BeerBong wrote:
Hello,
> 6177 pts/2S 0:00 \_ -sh
> 16310 pts/2S 0:00 \_ run-parts --report /etc/cron.daily/
> 16388 pts/2Z 0:00 \_ [man-db ]
>
> What the hell is going on
> Every time different script, and if I run
56 matches
Mail list logo
