description to the package.
What do you consider "decent"?
I consider useful as decent.
Best wishes
Norbert
----
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan
e NMUing ;-)
Thanks for all your work
Norbert
--------
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E
ch that is not safe for now, it will
be included in v3.
Please proceed in your normal way, thanks
Best wishes
Norbert
--------
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org
...
I don't know what is the best - besides simply *not* translating
this part of the description, but I guess this is not an option.
All the best
Norbert
----
PREINING, Norbert htt
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Holger Wansing wrote:
> What about simply listing the package names, without their
> description ...
Not good - apt-cache search foobar would not help here.
That *is* a very useful feature to search for particular CTAN
packages without having to know the title.
N
st.
I agree, but for now I have adopted the method of separate paragraphs.
Norbert
PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info
JAIST, Japan TeX Live &
On Tue, 09 Jun 2015, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > Looks like serious bug for debiandoc-sgml (or texlive) in stable.
> > My mail to Norbert Preining bounced. But getting
> > him involved may be good idea since this seems to be generic tex tool
> > chain issue.
Can someone
can be uploaded for at least the next month. I hope till
that time also the last problem can be resolved.
All the best
Norbert
PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info
JAIST, Japan
Dear all,
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015, Norbert Preining wrote:
> What works not perfectly but much better:
> * building the *Russian* release notes
> normal text works without any problem, but
> boldface fonts/headers are still broken
Ok, that is actually a problem with fontconf
9 matches
Mail list logo
