Re: Ris: ddtp2.d.n down again but that's ok!

2020-06-21 Thread Joe Dalton
Hi Thomas, I can confirm that the issue is now solved. I have the old translation now. thanks Joe Den søndag den 14. juni 2020 19.10.20 CEST skrev Thomas Vincent : Hi Joe, Le 13/06/2020 à 21:18, Joe Dalton a écrit : > Hi have we lost the functionality where the old translations was

Re: Ris: ddtp2.d.n down again but that's ok!

2020-06-21 Thread Beatrice Torracca
Hi all, indeed the diff frame is now back and working, but it seems to fetch the wrong old description sometimes. For instance here https://ddtp.debian.org/ddtss/index.cgi/it/forreview/bsdutils it shows the diff with version 815 (very old) instead of 276327 which is the previous one, as one ca

Re: Ris: ddtp2.d.n down again but that's ok!

2020-06-21 Thread Andrey Skvortsov
Hi Beatrice, Thank you for the feedback. Thomas fixed that problem today, just have not pushed the production server. Now it's out and diff should be made against the latest description. Now forreview looks ok, IMHO. https://ddtp.debian.org/ddtss/index.cgi/it/forreview/bsdutils On Sun, Jun 21, 2

Re: Ris: ddtp2.d.n down again but that's ok!

2020-06-21 Thread Thomas Vincent
Hi ! Le 21/06/2020 à 15:20, Beatrice Torracca a écrit : > indeed the diff frame is now back and working, but it seems to fetch the > wrong old description sometimes. > > For instance here > https://ddtp.debian.org/ddtss/index.cgi/it/forreview/bsdutils > > it shows the diff with version 815 (ver

python-certbot: Please translate debconf PO for the package python-certbot

2020-06-21 Thread Harlan Lieberman-Berg
Dear Debian I18N people, I would like to know if some of you would be interested in translating the debconf for certbot. It's simply a warning for users to confirm that they really want to purge certificates that seem to be still valid (linked in the live/ folder and unexpired). Please send the