Mathias, thankyou for responding to our query. :)
On 25/06/2008, at 6:50 AM, Mathias Klein wrote:
Hello,
[please cc me as i'm not an this list,
I hope I set up references correct - I dont have the original mail]
Hello,
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 06:17:06PM +0930, Clytie Siddall wrote:
On 15/06
Hi everyone :)
Sorry I haven't been able to participate much in discussions. I'm
particularly interested in the suggestions for structure/goals etc.,
although I think Christian isn't sufficiently aware of his strengths
as a leader.
I'd also really like to reduce some of the barriers to tr
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 07:03 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> 1) Checking if a declared template is still used
>
> Sometimes, maintainers rewrite maintainer scripts and remove the use a
> a given debconf template but do not think about dropping it from
> debian/*templates. It therefore clutte
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 16:05 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 07:03 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > 1) Checking if a declared template is still used
[...]
> As far as I can see, such a test does not currently exist. It would be
> fairly simple to add, assuming that
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 17:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 16:05 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 07:03 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > 1) Checking if a declared template is still used
> [...]
> > As far as I can see, such a test does
Hi all,
On Thursday, 3. July 2008 05:03, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Before I report this as a wishlist bug, I'd like to have your input
> on two ideas that popped up in my mind for possible lintian checks wrt
> debconf templates:
I got one more idea, but I'm not sure if it is feasible, because I
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> As far as I can see, such a test does not currently exist. It would be
> fairly simple to add, assuming that the following methodology would make
> sense (on a per-binary package basis):
>
> for each of config, preinst, postinst, prerm, postrm
> find uses of db_input
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 15:07 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > As far as I can see, such a test does not currently exist. It would be
> > fairly simple to add, assuming that the following methodology would make
> > sense (on a per-binary package basis):
> >
> > for each of config
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 18:22 +, Esko Arajärvi wrote:
> I got one more idea, but I'm not sure if it is feasible, because I know
> nothing of lintian's inner workings. Specifically I don't know if it has some
> kind of access to BTS, but let's try.
lintian's checks intentionally do not use any
Dear Debian translators,
diald is orphaned but has a few pending l10n translations. I'll then
build a QA upload to fix these.
The full planned schedule is available at the end of this mail.
The package is currently translated to:
cs de fr nl pt pt_BR sv
Among these, the following translations
Dear Debian maintainer,
The silc-server Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has
pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes
for po-debconf, namely bug number 487740 (and maybe other similar bugs).
Even if we're still far from the release of the next Debian versio
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 07:03 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Hello Lintian maintainers and i18n 'informal team',
>
> Before I report this as a wishlist bug, I'd like to have your input
> on two ideas that popped up in my mind for possible lintian checks wrt
> debconf templates:
>
> 1) Checking i
A Saturday 05 July 2008 19:22:20, Esko Arajärvi escreveu:
> Hi all,
[...]
>
> I got one more idea, but I'm not sure if it is feasible, because I know
> nothing of lintian's inner workings. Specifically I don't know if it has
> some kind of access to BTS, but let's try.
>
> One of the most irritati
Quoting Clytie Siddall ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> In particular, I have noticed what a difference it makes to
> participation if you have a Pootle server (eight of my projects are
> using Pootle now). I know we still have some scale issues with putting
> the whole of D-I and debconf and heaven k
Quoting Esko Arajärvi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> 1. Changelog proclaims a bug closed
> 2. The bug is marked with tags l10n and patch
> 3. There's a po file attached to the bug report
> 4. This po file is not in the package's po directory
That would give false positives in the case where a maintainer
"Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 17:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> This should of course just be
>> for each of config, postinst
> Hrm, or should it? The current lintian debconf checks only check config
> and postinst, but checking the other maintainer sc
"Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Perhaps unsurprisingly, debconf itself throws up quite a few false
> positives as debconf-apt-progress makes use of a number of templates
> which are otherwise unused. If desirable, debconf could be exempted from
> the check, as it is from some of th
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 15:01 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> "Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 17:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> >> This should of course just be
> >> for each of config, postinst
>
> > Hrm, or should it? The current lintian debconf checks o
"Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Looking through the current checks, the patch could probably be safely
> reduced by simply running the main checks against all of the maintainer
> scripts, rather than just config and postinst; there are a couple of
> checks which are specific to ind
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 11:15:12PM +0930, Clytie Siddall wrote:
> Can we use this more widely? Unfortunately, I am unable to code
> anymore (or think straight, half the time ;) ), but I'll do whatever I
> can to help.
from the German POV definitly, we use it a lot. So it really depens i
Dear Debian maintainer,
The irqbalance Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has
pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes
for po-debconf, namely bug number 414452 (and maybe other similar bugs).
Even if we're still far from the release of the next Debian version
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 11:41:11PM +0930, Clytie Siddall wrote:
> In particular, I have noticed what a difference it makes to
> participation if you have a Pootle server (eight of my projects are
> using Pootle now). I know we still have some scale issues with putting
Is there some do
Quoting Helge Kreutzmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Maybe a "Release-wish" in Lenny+1, which could be upgraded to a
> release goal in Lenny+2? (More seriously, probably a "man pages should
> use an automated means to manage their translations, preferably using
> po4a" or similar for policy)
That's re
23 matches
Mail list logo
