Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support

2001-04-09 Thread Enrique Zanardi
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 06:10:13PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I think tt may be easy to provide the forked package with utf-8 support > > for testing. Is this still OK ? > > Absolutely. > > > maybe newt-uff8 and slang1-utf8 or newt-i18n and s

Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support

2001-04-09 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Thanks to point it out for me, Adam. I was confused. In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on "08 Apr 2001 17:07:35 -0400", with "Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support", Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think there's a little confusion.The materials at > http://people.debian.

Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support

2001-04-09 Thread David Whedon
> > I think there's a little confusion.The materials at > > http://people.debian.org/~dwhedon/debian/> is for the font > > sources and stuff -- it would be a different package from > > slang/newt-utf8. > > Exactly. Please upload it for us, David. > I'll concentrate on slang/newt-utf8. uploade

Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support

2001-04-09 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Hi, David. David Whedon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Exactly. Please upload it for us, David. > > I'll concentrate on slang/newt-utf8. > > uploaded. Thanks! Since Enrique said that he will upload the newt packages with utf-8 support, the rest is just one: slang1 with utf-8 support. I hope

Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support

2001-04-09 Thread Jim Mintha
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 03:08:13AM +0900, Taketoshi Sano wrote: > Hi, David. > > David Whedon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Exactly. Please upload it for us, David. > > > I'll concentrate on slang/newt-utf8. > > > > uploaded. > > Thanks! Since Enrique said that he will upload the newt

Re: Help with man-db #40743

2001-04-09 Thread Tomohiro KUBOTA
Hi, At Sat, 7 Apr 2001 23:44:04 +0100, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With that in mind, I have an open bug ( #40743 ) against man-db, > which asks for its treatment of LANG, LC_*, and LANGUAGE to be changed. I checked the bug and man-db 2.3.17.1-2. I found that this point (the bug h

Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support

2001-04-09 Thread Jim Mintha
> > I hope the maintainer of slang1, Jim Mintha, will provide it for us > > as well as Enrique will do with newt. But if it can not be done, > > we'll need something to use. So I'll prepare to work on slang1-utf8. > > I have been following the discussions. I more than willing to help > out, by

Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support

2001-04-09 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Akira Yoshiyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> who made the patch for termwrap, > has made the customized boot-floppies for potato used on NEC pc9800 > series. Speaking of termwrap, since boot-floppies is not responsible for building base, we've had to remove the

Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support

2001-04-09 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 06:10:13PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > > I'd rather not force that, esp. for users who just need the ASCII > > > > set. Can't we get it to write out the config files (such as > > > > /etc/hosts, /etc/network/interfaces, et