On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 06:10:13PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I think tt may be easy to provide the forked package with utf-8 support > > for testing. Is this still OK ? > > Absolutely. > > > maybe newt-uff8 and slang1-utf8 or newt-i18n and slang1-i18n. > > I think I like the *-utf8 names better. > > > They would have conflict with the normal version. And if they are > > OK, then the normal package can merge the utf-8 support safely, and > > we won't need the separate pacakages then. > > Sounds good.
Who's going to work on newt-utf8? As I'm going to work on newt this week, to build a -pic version, and fix a few serious bugs, I may as well integrate the utf8 patch, and use a "#define" to build both the "simple" and the -utf8 version from the same sources. I'm assuming we are talking about the patch included in Bug#91963. -- Enrique Zanardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
