Re: naming scheme, pt-br versus pt_BR in DDP

2010-04-07 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06-04-2010 19:10, Simon Paillard wrote: > In the process of moving www.d.o to another host, many inconsistencies > pop-up. > > The last one being: > * links to pt_BR from the website (for example > http://www.debian.org/doc/devel-manuals#devref)

Re: naming scheme, pt-br versus pt_BR in DDP

2010-04-07 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 05:57:08AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Simon Paillard (simon.paill...@resel.enst-bretagne.fr): > > > pt_BR: used by release-notes, d-i, debian-faq, refcard > > pt-br: used by apt-howto, maint-guide, quick-ref, securing-howto > > > I think that pt_BR should b

Re: naming scheme, pt-br versus pt_BR in DDP

2010-04-06 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Simon Paillard (simon.paill...@resel.enst-bretagne.fr): > pt_BR: used by release-notes, d-i, debian-faq, refcard > pt-br: used by apt-howto, maint-guide, quick-ref, securing-howto I think that pt_BR should be the winner, nearly without discussion? As you mentioned, this is the locale nam

naming scheme, pt-br versus pt_BR in DDP

2010-04-06 Thread Simon Paillard
Hi, In the process of moving www.d.o to another host, many inconsistencies pop-up. The last one being: * links to pt_BR from the website (for example http://www.debian.org/doc/devel-manuals#devref) * the source and built files have been renamed from pt_BR to pt-br in DDP by some translators