> From: Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> File them against general (or whatever existing pseudo package is most
> appropriate) and I'll reassign them when I create the pseudopackage.
>
> I also need to know which mailing list/person is going to be
> responsible for the psuedopackage. You al
FYI
Andreas.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2008/7/21
Subject: Re: Bug#388212: Request for Pseudopackage: debian-i18n
To: Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, A
Hi,
according to recent discussion on the debian-i18n mailing list I
would really support the idea of this pseudopackage. You might
like to read for instance the posting
http://lists.debian.org/debian-i18n/2008/07/msg00272.html
where I feel a big need to report bugs (at least three from thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/19/2006 06:35 AM, Frans Pop wrote:
> (Replying only to list for discussion.)
>
> I was not in Extremadura, so this is mostly a request for clarification...
>
> On Tuesday 19 September 2006 10:21, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>
>> At the the i18n Extr
(Replying only to list for discussion.)
I was not in Extremadura, so this is mostly a request for clarification...
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 10:21, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> At the the i18n Extremadura Meeting[1] we discussed how to be able to
> handle i18n and l10n bugs more conveniently and h
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Tag: moreinfo
* Submitter: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> At the the i18n Extremadura Meeting[1] we discussed how to be able
> to handle i18n and l10n bugs more conveniently and having a way to
> be able
Hello!
At the the i18n Extremadura Meeting[1] we discussed how to be able to
handle i18n and l10n bugs more conveniently and having a way to be able
to track those things more closely. The various ways our BTS currently
offers where discussed and we came to the conclusion that a pseudo
p
7 matches
Mail list logo
