=?iso-8859-2?Q?SZERV=C1C_Attila?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> `ttf-gentium (1.02-2) unstable
> Move to main, the OFL is considered free by debian-legal.'
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2006/02/msg01782.html
Well, I think that's obviously a bug. AFAIK, there's a grand
total of two post
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Clytie Siddall wrote:
> On 23/02/2006, at 1:22 AM, MJ Ray wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri)
> >> On Feb 22, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> The OFL FAQ claims it follows the DFSG, but DDs disagree. See
> >>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/01/msg0
On 23/02/2006, at 5:17 PM, SZERVÁC Attila wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Clytie Siddall wrote:
I dunno. What about gsfonts, thryomanes?
I don't know those. Where do I get them to test?
apt-get install gsfonts* ttf-thryomanes
:-)
For those of us running Mac OSX, I should have sai
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Clytie Siddall wrote:
> > I dunno. What about gsfonts, thryomanes?
>
> I don't know those. Where do I get them to test?
apt-get install gsfonts* ttf-thryomanes
:-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
On 23/02/2006, at 1:22 AM, MJ Ray wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri)
On Feb 22, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The OFL FAQ claims it follows the DFSG, but DDs disagree. See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/01/msg00454.html
And many others agree.
It seems fairly clear that
On 22/02/2006, at 6:26 PM, SZERVÁC Attila wrote:
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Clytie Siddall wrote:
Gentium (a true Unicode font) has been released under the Open Font
Licence:
Gentium still is not free
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=341138
(due the prohibition of license mod
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri)
> On Feb 22, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The OFL FAQ claims it follows the DFSG, but DDs disagree. See
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/01/msg00454.html
> And many others agree.
It seems fairly clear that forbidding API-compatibility is
troub
On Feb 22, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The OFL FAQ claims it follows the DFSG, but DDs disagree. See
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/01/msg00454.html
And many others agree.
> for example. Please do not upload OFL'd fonts to main for now.
Please do.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature
Clytie Siddall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Gentium (a true Unicode font) has been released under the Open Font
> Licence:
> http://www.sil.org/computing/catalog/show_software.asp?id=83
Last I heard, the Open Font Licence got its name change clause
(clause 3) wrong and prevents people making API-compatib
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Clytie Siddall wrote:
> Gentium (a true Unicode font) has been released under the Open Font
> Licence:
Gentium still is not free
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=341138
(due the prohibition of license mod in deriv. works)
> We're not getting anywhere, ap
Hi Christian,
>
> Hmmm, technically speaking, I did not NMU the package. M.
> Adnène (adn) hijacked it and I sponsored the upload (I even
> encouraged Mohammed to hijack the package)...:-)
Ah, ok :)
>
> Thi sdoes not change anything to the result...however, unless
> I'm wrong, the udeb cont
Quoting Viti Davide ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Frans,
> I just noticed you've used the tarball for arabeyes:
> Christian did a NMU a while ago (see [1])
> So you can just drop the tarball and use the official udeb which
> Contains "ae_AlMohanad.ttf" rather than "ae_Tholoth.ttf"; apparently
> The result
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 10:55:12AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 09:52:47AM +0100, Viti Davide wrote:
> > Frans,
> > I just noticed you've used the tarball for arabeyes:
> > Christian did a NMU a while ago (see [1])
> > So you can just drop the tarball and use the official ude
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 09:52:47AM +0100, Viti Davide wrote:
> Frans,
> I just noticed you've used the tarball for arabeyes:
> Christian did a NMU a while ago (see [1])
> So you can just drop the tarball and use the official udeb which
> Contains "ae_AlMohanad.ttf" rather than "ae_Tholoth.ttf"; app
Frans,
I just noticed you've used the tarball for arabeyes:
Christian did a NMU a while ago (see [1])
So you can just drop the tarball and use the official udeb which
Contains "ae_AlMohanad.ttf" rather than "ae_Tholoth.ttf"; apparently
The result is much better (there's still a jpg in my webspace [
J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\) writes:
> > 3. are there unicode console/x-window fonts available?
>
> X: yes. E.g. http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs-fonts.html
>
> Console: I don't think this is possible. The console uses VGA fonts. These
> are limited to 512 characters.
Well, it's possible to emu
On Thu, Dec 10, 1998 at 01:46:15 +0100, Pavel Makovec wrote:
> J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) napsal:
> > Console: I don't think this is possible. The console uses VGA fonts.
> > These are limited to 512 characters.
>
> that explains unicode mapping. I hope we are not stuck with vga forever.
> (current cards
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) napsal:
>
> On Tue, Dec 08, 1998 at 18:57:42 +0100, Pavel Makovec wrote:
>> afaik, linux kernels support unicode mapping => more questions:
>> 1. is a full unicode kernel support feasible in the near-future?
>
> I don't know. What do you mean by "full unicode kernel support"?
I
On Tue, Dec 08, 1998 at 18:57:42 +0100, Pavel Makovec wrote:
> afaik, linux kernels support unicode mapping => more questions:
> 1. is a full unicode kernel support feasible in the near-future?
I don't know. What do you mean by "full unicode kernel support"?
> 3. are there unicode console/x-windo
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Michael Sobolev writes:
> > LILO (which I am using) does not seem to be developped actively...
> Don't really know. Well, the inter-release interval seems quite large
> at least.
In the last days there was an announcement on c.o.l.a for LILO 21 ...
Bye
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS napsal:
>Is it a good idea to use the framebuffer to internationalise
>installation floppies? If so, is there any software already available
>for generating simply windows, menus, buttons, etc, like what newt
>does, but in a variety of languages, such as Chinese, Arabic, Korean
On Mon, Dec 07, 1998 at 11:00:13PM +0100, Pavel Makovec wrote:
> Michael Sobolev napsal:
>
> >My desire to have the fonts loaded just before kernel is to
> >help my wife to use computer without learning English.
>
> what about the english (post, bios) messages before boot?
OK. Let me be more sp
Michael Sobolev napsal:
>My desire to have the fonts loaded just before kernel is to
>help my wife to use computer without learning English.
what about the english (post, bios) messages before boot?
cheers,
pavel
Michael Sobolev writes:
> OK. Here is what I need. Usually I set LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, this means that
> all
> programs that are using appropriate functions, have their's output localized.
> For example, when I compile a kernel, it updates the version file (or
> something
> like that) that s
On Sun, Dec 06, 1998 at 02:39:04PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ re framebuffer console and VGA graphics mode in 2.1.xxx ]
Hmm... I have not tried 2.1.xxx, maybe it is a good idea to try them out. But
if it is a really *graphics* mode, I doubt this is that useful at all. VGA
adapters allows
> > Why do you need so ? If there *is* a general need for this, this
> > should be handled by kbd directly, but I (as kbd maintainer) need to
> > know exactly what you'd like to see.
> OK. Here is what I need. Usually I set LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, this means that
> all
> programs that are using appr
On Wed, Dec 02, 1998 at 11:17:56PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> Why do you need so ? If there *is* a general need for this, this
> should be handled by kbd directly, but I (as kbd maintainer) need to
> know exactly what you'd like to see.
OK. Here is what I need. Usually I set LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R,
Michael Sobolev writes:
> > I think that the standard way to change the console font is by modifying
> > the file /etc/kbd/config. For example, the line
> >
> > CONSOLE_FONT=iso01.f16
> >
> > would load the font iso01.f16 from directory
> > /usr/share/consolefonts/.
>
> This is exactly
On Fri, Nov 13, 1998 at 12:20:01AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Could anybody please direct me to the information on how to load
> > needed font as soon as possible? At the moment, I think that the
> > first chance place is /etc/rc.boot, where init looks during start-up.
> > Is it possible
29 matches
Mail list logo
