-=| Davide Viti, Wed, 6 Jun 2007 21:09:17 +0200 |=-
> I've done it and updated the pngs for Bulgarian; looks like 2.16 and
> 2.17 do not differ now. Please check
>
> http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/
Both look fine. Thank you very much.
--
damJabberID: [EMAIL PRO
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:30:38PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> -=| Davide Viti, Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:05:57 +0200 |=-
> > Looks like there are differences only for "bg" and "he": probably some
> > glyphs got hinted.
>
> I'd say that the last line of BG looks different than upper lines. Any
> idea w
Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> -=| Davide Viti, Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:05:57 +0200 |=-
>> Looks like there are differences only for "bg" and "he": probably some
>> glyphs got hinted.
>
> I'd say that the last line of BG looks different than upper lines. Any
> idea why is that?
I think it was broken in 2.16-1
-=| Davide Viti, Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:05:57 +0200 |=-
> Looks like there are differences only for "bg" and "he": probably some
> glyphs got hinted.
I'd say that the last line of BG looks different than upper lines. Any
idea why is that?
I see similar effect on ne, ta, zh_TW - could this be caused b
On 2/3/07, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I took some screenshots using latest dejavu 2.14; please refer to [1]
to see what changed since version 2.13.
The screenshots can be found in [2], and in case you wanted to compare them to
those
taken using the previous version, see [3]
feedbac
On 11/29/06, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I took some screenshots using latest dejavu 2.12; please refer to [1]
to see what changed since version 2.11.
Note that Hebrew is now using glyphs from Dejavu rather than from Freefont (see
[2])
The screenshots can be found in [3], and in cas
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 02:20:09 +0100, Sunjae Park wrote:
> On Monday 30 October 2006 14:07, Davide Viti wrote:
>> [quoted text muted]
>
> Korean (ko) has a letter that does not display correctly in both 2.10 and
> 2.11. I can't make out the Unicode code, though.
the string is the following:
"뛰고
Hi Jamil
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 01:41:34PM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
> Bengali (bn) seems okay. But need to increase the font size. :)
I did not forget about this: I remember you noticed it a long time ago already.
ATM we're stuck waiting for a new upload of fontconfig; we can't do anything
abo
> > I've attached screenshots of each sample character
...which I've just uploaded at the following link:
http://www.webalice.it/zinosat/g-i/dejavu_more.zip
regards,
Davide
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 10/31/06, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I took some screenshots using latest dejavu 2.11; please refer to [1]
to see what changed since last version.
The screenshots can be found in [2], and in case you wanted to compare them to
those
taken using the previous version, see [3]
feedb
Hi Clytie,
trying again to send this to the relevant ML since I guess
other people are very interested in your useful comments
regards,
Davide
- Forwarded message from Clytie Siddall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> On 31/10/2006, at 5:37 AM, Davide Viti wrote:
>
> >I took some screenshots using
2006/10/30, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I took some screenshots using latest dejavu 2.11; please refer to [1]
to see what changed since last version.
The screenshots can be found in [2], and in case you wanted to compare them to
those
taken using the previous version, see [3]
feedback is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Davide Viti wrote:
> I took some screenshots using latest dejavu 2.11; please refer to [1]
> to see what changed since last version.
>
> The screenshots can be found in [2], and in case you wanted to compare them
> to those
> taken using the previous
On Monday 30 October 2006 14:07, Davide Viti wrote:
> I took some screenshots using latest dejavu 2.11; please refer to [1]
> to see what changed since last version.
>
> The screenshots can be found in [2], and in case you wanted to compare them
> to those taken using the previous version, see [3]
On 12/09/2006, at 5:36 AM, Davide Viti wrote:
I've taken some screenshots as it was done a while ago (see [1])
hoping that your comments can help improving fonts quality for
Debian and in particular for the new graphical installer.
Definitely an improvement in DV 2.9. It's still not perfect,
Hello,
[3] http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/20060911_dejavu2.9/
[3] http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/20060621_dejavu2.7/
Georgian part of the screenshot looks much better in 2.9 than it did in 2.7
Regards,
Aiet Kolkhi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
Hi Eddy,
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 04:37:22PM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> The font size is different in the screenshots and, thus I can't tell
> if the "half of breve" issue has gone.
but does the latest version of the screenshot look ok for Romanian?
ciao,
Davide
signature.asc
Description: Di
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 03:17:35PM +0200, G Karunakar wrote:
> Hindi looks fine in this screenshot.. but i found some other issues -
> eg the top part of Hindi string above the base line (from which
> character seem to hang) is not appearing in the text just below the
> logo banner, in the install
On 11/09/06, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the screenshots can be found in [2], and in case you wanted to compare them
to the
> previous, see [3]
>
> feedback is very welcome
> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2006/06/msg01178.html
[2] http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/
Kurdish (ku) is fine.
2006/9/12, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I've taken some screenshots as it was done a while ago (see [1])
hoping that your comments can help improving fonts quality for
Debian and in particular for the new graphical installer.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2006/06/msg01178.html
[3] h
On 9/12/06, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've taken some screenshots as it was done a while ago (see [1])
hoping that your comments can help improving fonts quality for
Debian and in particular for the new graphical installer.
Since the last survey, this is the list of major changes:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:06:45PM +0200, Davide Viti wrote:
> * dejavu2.9 has been used (last time we used 2.7)
> * #374902 was fixed with a new upload of libfreetype6-udeb_2.2.1-4_i386.udeb
> [2] http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/20060911_dejavu2.9/
> [3] http://d-i.alioth.
On Monday 11 September 2006 23:00, Jens Seidel wrote:
> I get .. instead of ... in the graphical installer for German. Is
> this a font problem or does the graphical installer just add additional
> ellipses?
It's not only in German...
Looks like the gtk frontend does indeed add three extra pe
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:06:45PM +0200, Davide Viti wrote:
> I've taken some screenshots as it was done a while ago (see [1])
>
> the screenshots can be found in [2], and in case you wanted to compare them
> to the
> previous, see [3]
I compared [2] and [3] and both look similar. Nevertheless
Hi Lior,
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:42:19PM +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Hebrew looks fine. thanks.
good; Hebrew is still using glyphs out of freefont.
Hebrew glyphs have just been included in dejavu: any chance you can give some
feedback about it? I'll try to get some screenshots to comp
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:06:45PM +0200, Davide Viti wrote:
> * #374902 was fixed with a new upload of libfreetype6-udeb_2.2.1-4_i386.udeb
libfreetype6-udeb_2.2.1-4
>
> the screenshots can be found in [2], and in case you wanted to compare them
> to the
> previous, see [3]
>
> feedback is v
On 7/2/06, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jamil,
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 05:29:55AM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
> >I also took a screenshot [1]; if you think it's fine I'll file a bug
> >against freefont and hide from Christian :)
>
> Yes, now it looks okay! Btw, it will be better if yo
Hi Jamil,
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 05:29:55AM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
> >I also took a screenshot [1]; if you think it's fine I'll file a bug
> >against freefont and hide from Christian :)
>
> Yes, now it looks okay! Btw, it will be better if you can make the
> font size little bigger. :-)
Just
On 22/06/2006, at 8:51 PM, Clytie Siddall wrote:
[1] http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/
20060621_dejavu2.7/
In Vietnamese, it's just readable at that size, but it's not very
good. I have to guess some of the diacritics from the context,
because they blend into each oth
On 6/27/06, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jamil,
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 02:57:06PM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
> Yes there are differences. Please check it, I have marked some problems:
> http://www.ankurbangla.org/images/di_bn_problem.png
I rebuilt a version of the freefont udeb whi
Hi Jamil,
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 02:57:06PM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
> Yes there are differences. Please check it, I have marked some problems:
> http://www.ankurbangla.org/images/di_bn_problem.png
I rebuilt a version of the freefont udeb which comments the following
# if ! echo $1 | grep -q B
On 6/24/06, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jamil,
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:46:45PM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
> >> Which version are you using?
> >
> >Version: 20060501cvs-2
> >we use the udeb where many glyphs were removed for reducing memory
> >footprint
>
> By anychance did you re
On 6/24/06, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 07:01:14AM -0700, Damodharan Rajalingam wrote:
> Hmm.. TSCu_Paranar is the font which I use in my Debian box and dont
> have any problem with it. Also there was a screenshot sent when Tamil
> was announced a supported lan
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 07:01:14AM -0700, Damodharan Rajalingam wrote:
> Hmm.. TSCu_Paranar is the font which I use in my Debian box and dont
> have any problem with it. Also there was a screenshot sent when Tamil
> was announced a supported language. The tamil font rendering in that
> screenshot
On Saturday 24 June 2006 16:44, Davide Viti wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 02:16:03PM -0700, Damodharan Rajalingam wrote:
> > Tamil characters are not shown properly :-(. What is the font used
> > for Tamil (ta)?
>
> TSCu_Paranar contained in ttf-tamil-fonts.
> What is wrong with it?
> Can you s
Hmm.. TSCu_Paranar is the font which I use in my Debian box and dont have any problem with it. Also there was a screenshot sent when Tamil was announced a supported language. The tamil font rendering in that screenshot was fine. Is it because of font stripping? Can we try with unstipped font?DamuOn
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 02:16:03PM -0700, Damodharan Rajalingam wrote:
> Tamil characters are not shown properly :-(. What is the font used for Tamil
> (ta)?
TSCu_Paranar contained in ttf-tamil-fonts.
What is wrong with it?
Can you suggest any alternatives?
Davide
signature.asc
Description:
Hi Jamil,
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:46:45PM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
> >> Which version are you using?
> >
> >Version: 20060501cvs-2
> >we use the udeb where many glyphs were removed for reducing memory
> >footprint
>
> By anychance did you remove the glyphs of conjunts? :-)
I replaced the st
Tamil characters are not shown properly :-(. What is the font used for Tamil (ta)? - Original Message From: Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Debian Boot Cc: Debian i18n ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 6:31:13 AMSubject: [g-i] new screenshots availableDejavu 2.7 has made
On 6/23/06, Viti Davide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Version: 20060501cvs-2
> > we use the udeb where many glyphs were removed for reducing memory
> > footprint
>
> By anychance did you remove the glyphs of conjunts? :-)
Do they fall on any of the following ranges?
ranges="$ranges u0400:u052F
> > Version: 20060501cvs-2
> > we use the udeb where many glyphs were removed for reducing memory
> > footprint
>
> By anychance did you remove the glyphs of conjunts? :-)
Do they fall on any of the following ranges?
ranges="$ranges u0400:u052F" # Cyrilic
ranges="$ranges u0530:u058F" # Armenian
On 6/23/06, Viti Davide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Version: 20060501cvs-2
> > we use the udeb where many glyphs were removed for reducing memory
> > footprint
>
> By anychance did you remove the glyphs of conjunts? :-)
Do they fall on any of the following ranges?
ranges="$ranges u0400:u052F
On 6/23/06, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:33:16AM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
> Which version are you using?
Version: 20060501cvs-2
we use the udeb where many glyphs were removed for reducing memory footprint
By anychance did you remove the glyphs of conjun
On 6/23/06, Siim Põder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed that using experimental g-i images based on latest
> libraries, everything looks more consistent, that's why I don't think
> it's the right time to spend time on fixing fonts file: I think I'll give
> a go at font hacking once new libr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/22/06, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It would be interesting to have some feedback from native speakers;
Thai screenshot looks OK. I'll try out the ISO image soon, though.
- --
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
http://linux.thai.net/~thep/
Quoting Davide Viti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:33:16AM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
> > Yes, freefont has Bengali support. You sent us these [2], [3], [4]
> > screenshots using freefonts [8] - which had no rendering problems at
> > all.
>
> ah!
>
> > Currently I am using it [9
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:33:16AM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
> Yes, freefont has Bengali support. You sent us these [2], [3], [4]
> screenshots using freefonts [8] - which had no rendering problems at
> all.
ah!
> Currently I am using it [9] in Dapper - no rendering problem.
>
> Which version ar
On 22.06.2006 04:01, Davide Viti wrote:
Dejavu 2.7 has made it into unstable and things are happening on the
font side. I just created a new set of screenshots in [1]; everything
is pretty much the best we can do atm, apart from Arabic / Farsi (see
#374720)
It would be interesting to have some fe
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 09:20:04PM +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> Hebrew looks fine. Thanks.
that's freefont: cool.
I take advantage of the situation...
there are 31 (minor) errors in l1 translations for Hebrew [1] spotted
by the spellchecker: could you please fix those or let us know if
are falso po
On 6/23/06, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bengali [2] doesn't look 100% okay. Conjuncts are not rendering properly.
we use freefont to display Bengali; quite a few Indic languages are now
supported
from freefont now.
Yes, freefont has Bengali support. You sent us these [2], [3], [4
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 08:56:43AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> So, mor ethan screenshots, it would be really good to test a real
> install with a mini ISO image. Going up to the partitioning stage can
> be done on any machine safely as the installer is not destructive
> before it writes down
Hi Eugeniy,
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 03:18:49AM +0300, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 22 червня 2006 о 03:01 +0200 Davide Viti написав(-ла):
> > It would be interesting to have some feedback from native speakers;
> It looks good for Ukrainian (except bad glyphs for б that hopefully will
>
> Bengali [2] doesn't look 100% okay. Conjuncts are not rendering properly.
we use freefont to display Bengali; quite a few Indic languages are now
supported
from freefont now.
We used Mukti in the past and also had positive feedback with freefont; if you
think
using Mukti would be more appropri
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 12:14:51AM +0100, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
> Russian (ru) looks very good.
great.
> ...
> That is just a tiny cosmetical issue, nothing important.
thanx for reporting; now that we found a set of fonts to display all
the supported languages, it's important to know what shoul
Davide Viti wrote:
> Dejavu 2.7 has made it into unstable and things are happening on the
> font side. I just created a new set of screenshots in [1]; everything
> is pretty much the best we can do atm, apart from Arabic / Farsi (see
> #374720)
Hebrew looks fine. Thanks.
>
> regards,
> Davide
>
Hi,I installed the deb from ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/ttf-dejavu/. The new support for the Kurdish/Arabic script is great. The hinting especially of the dots may need some improvement, but that is a known issue. Thanks to Ben for implementing. DejaVu Sans is now the first free font fo
On 22/06/2006, at 10:31 AM, Davide Viti wrote:
Dejavu 2.7 has made it into unstable and things are happening on the
font side. I just created a new set of screenshots in [1]; everything
is pretty much the best we can do atm, apart from Arabic / Farsi (see
#374720)
It would be interesting to hav
Quoting Leang Chumsoben ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hello,
>
> > It would be interesting to have some feedback from native speakers;
> it looks pretty good for Khmer.
We should confirm this and more specifically dig into it.
When I had a look at G-I with Javier Sola at Debconf, for Khmer, he
mentioen
Hello,
> It would be interesting to have some feedback from native speakers;
it looks pretty good for Khmer.
Cheers,
Soben
--
Khmer Software Initiative (KhmerOS)
www.khmeros.info
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
22 червня 2006 о 03:01 +0200 Davide Viti написав(-ла):
> It would be interesting to have some feedback from native speakers;
It looks good for Ukrainian (except bad glyphs for б that hopefully will
be fixed soon in DejaVu).
> I'd be
> particularly interested to know how is Vietnamese displaye
On 6/22/06, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dejavu 2.7 has made it into unstable and things are happening on the
font side. I just created a new set of screenshots in [1]; everything
is pretty much the best we can do atm, apart from Arabic / Farsi (see
#374720)
It would be interesting to h
62 matches
Mail list logo
