Re: [g-i] new screenshots available (dejavu 2.17)

2007-06-06 Thread Damyan Ivanov
-=| Davide Viti, Wed, 6 Jun 2007 21:09:17 +0200 |=- > I've done it and updated the pngs for Bulgarian; looks like 2.16 and > 2.17 do not differ now. Please check > > http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/ Both look fine. Thank you very much. -- damJabberID: [EMAIL PRO

Re: [g-i] new screenshots available (dejavu 2.17)

2007-06-06 Thread Davide Viti
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:30:38PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > -=| Davide Viti, Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:05:57 +0200 |=- > > Looks like there are differences only for "bg" and "he": probably some > > glyphs got hinted. > > I'd say that the last line of BG looks different than upper lines. Any > idea w

Re: [g-i] new screenshots available (dejavu 2.17)

2007-06-04 Thread Eddy Petrișor
Damyan Ivanov wrote: > -=| Davide Viti, Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:05:57 +0200 |=- >> Looks like there are differences only for "bg" and "he": probably some >> glyphs got hinted. > > I'd say that the last line of BG looks different than upper lines. Any > idea why is that? I think it was broken in 2.16-1

Re: [g-i] new screenshots available (dejavu 2.17)

2007-06-04 Thread Damyan Ivanov
-=| Davide Viti, Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:05:57 +0200 |=- > Looks like there are differences only for "bg" and "he": probably some > glyphs got hinted. I'd say that the last line of BG looks different than upper lines. Any idea why is that? I see similar effect on ne, ta, zh_TW - could this be caused b

[g-i] new screenshots available (dejavu 2.17)

2007-06-04 Thread Davide Viti
Hi all, finally managed to create new screenshots [1] meant to compare fonts rendering inside g-i; the problems reported in the previous round of screenshots [2] seem to have gone with the upgrade to newer libraries. Looks like there are differences only for "bg" and "he": probably some glyphs go