Re: Plan B for kfreebsd

2014-11-11 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Christoph Egger wrote: > It means we need a stable release of some sort to keep DSA provided > hardware. That's currently buildds and porterboxes. That's annoying. To provide stable/security support ourselves, it seemed we'd need an unofficial repo, and that doesn't sound like something DSA could

Re: Plan B for kfreebsd

2014-11-11 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! Steven Chamberlain writes: > Christoph Egger wrote: >> It means we need a stable release of some sort to keep DSA provided >> hardware. That's currently buildds and porterboxes. > > That's annoying. > > To provide stable/security support ourselves, it seemed we'd need an > unofficial repo, an

Re: Plan B for kfreebsd

2014-11-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Steven Chamberlain, le Tue 11 Nov 2014 12:05:06 +, a écrit : > Although, how is that handled for hurd-i386? I assume it has no > security support, there may be some unofficial packages used; are > therefore none of their machines DSA? We are still stuck in the "not released arch => no DSA ma

Re: Plan B for kfreebsd

2014-11-11 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Steven Chamberlain, le Tue 11 Nov 2014 12:05:06 +, a écrit : > > Although, how is that handled for hurd-i386? I assume it has no > > security support, there may be some unofficial packages used; are > > therefore none of their machines DSA? > >

Re: Plan B for kfreebsd

2014-11-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Peter Palfrader, le Tue 11 Nov 2014 13:39:02 +0100, a écrit : > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Steven Chamberlain, le Tue 11 Nov 2014 12:05:06 +, a écrit : > > > Although, how is that handled for hurd-i386? I assume it has no > > > security support, there may be some unoffi

Re: Plan B for kfreebsd

2014-11-11 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Peter Palfrader, le Tue 11 Nov 2014 13:39:02 +0100, a écrit : > > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > We are still stuck in the "not released arch => no DSA machine => not > > > released arch" loop. > > > > Except that it's not a loop. D

Re: Plan B for kfreebsd

2014-11-11 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > We are still stuck in the "not released arch => no DSA machine => not > > released arch" loop. > > Except that it's not a loop. DSA has indicated time and time again that > if an arch qualifies for a release in all other asp

Re: Plan B for kfreebsd

2014-11-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Steven Chamberlain, le Tue 11 Nov 2014 13:41:18 +, a écrit : > Practically it would be an 'official Debian port', and we'd have all the > usual things like install media. I wouldn't call it "official", but I agree on the rest. Getting hurt by sid bugs is always a pain, and you can not have us

Re: Plan B for kfreebsd

2014-11-11 Thread Hector Oron
Hello, 2014-11-11 14:41 GMT+01:00 Steven Chamberlain : > Peter Palfrader wrote: >> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Anyway, I'm really hopeful now. weasel suggested a 'jessie-kfreebsd' > suite could still be supported by FTP team. (Actually, could that be > named something more gen

Re: Building glibc-2.19-14~0 with fakeroot-hurd/fakreoot-tcp

2014-11-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Mon 10 Nov 2014 17:59:45 +0100, a écrit : > Previously glibc-2.19-* built fine with fakeroot-hurd (no testsuite), > but the latest version does not: glibc-2.19-14~0: But what "previously" is exactly? Did you try to downgrade the libc or hurd installed on your box? Note that I

Re: Building glibc-2.19-14~0 with fakeroot-hurd/fakreoot-tcp

2014-11-11 Thread Svante Signell
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 00:07 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, le Mon 10 Nov 2014 17:59:45 +0100, a écrit : > > Previously glibc-2.19-* built fine with fakeroot-hurd (no testsuite), > > but the latest version does not: glibc-2.19-14~0: > > But what "previously" is exactly? Did you tr

Re: Building glibc-2.19-14~0 with fakeroot-hurd/fakreoot-tcp

2014-11-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Wed 12 Nov 2014 00:16:37 +0100, a écrit : > On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 00:07 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Svante Signell, le Mon 10 Nov 2014 17:59:45 +0100, a écrit : > > > Previously glibc-2.19-* built fine with fakeroot-hurd (no testsuite), > > > but the latest version does not

Bug#769189: isc-dhcp-client: dhclient -6 -r waits 1m, affecting finish-install on !linux

2014-11-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Package: isc-dhcp-client Version: 4.3.1-5 Severity: important Hello, Running dhclient -6 -r basically hangs for one minute before returning. Running dhclient -1 -6 -r does finish. dhclient.c reads as if (release mode) { #ifndef DHCPv6 return 0; #else i

Processing of hurd_0.5.git20141108-4_hurd-i386.changes

2014-11-11 Thread Debian FTP Masters
hurd_0.5.git20141108-4_hurd-i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: hurd_0.5.git20141108-4.dsc hurd_0.5.git20141108-4.debian.tar.bz2 hurd-libs0.3_0.5.git20141108-4_hurd-i386.deb hurd_0.5.git20141108-4_hurd-i386.deb hurd-dev_0.5.git20141108-4_hurd-i386.deb h

hurd_0.5.git20141108-4_hurd-i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2014-11-11 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 23:57:23 + Source: hurd Binary: hurd-libs0.3 hurd hurd-dev hurd-dbg hurd-doc hurd-libs0.3-udeb hurd-udeb Architecture: source hurd-i386 all Version: 1:0.5.git20141108-4 Distribution: unstable Urgenc