On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Peter Palfrader, le Tue 11 Nov 2014 13:39:02 +0100, a écrit :
> > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > We are still stuck in the "not released arch => no DSA machine => not
> > > released arch" loop.
> >
> > Except that it's not a loop. DSA has indicated time and time again that
> > if an arch qualifies for a release in all other aspects, we'd be running
> > buildds and porterboxes close to the release. And, TTBOMK, the release
> > team has so far accepted that. IOW the fact that hurd is not being
> > released with jessie is not due to not having d.o systems.
>
> Ok, then I don't understand why there are "DSA-admined buildds" and
> "security buildds" columns in the release qualification sheet.
Because they need to exist for the release. They are necessary, not
sufficient. You aren't blocking on them.
If/when DSA admined buildds are the only remaining issue and we're close
to the release, then we can make them.
--
| .''`. ** Debian **
Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System
| `- http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141111131109.gm20...@anguilla.noreply.org
