Re: clock(3) non-functional?

2014-07-01 Thread Svante Signell
On Sun, 2014-06-29 at 22:56 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Svante Signell, le Sun 29 Jun 2014 16:35:42 +0200, a écrit : > > Looking at libsamplerate test problems, I found that clock(3) used > > there is not reliable. Strange results are obtained on too Linux with a > > simple test pro

Re: clock(3) non-functional?

2014-07-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Tue 01 Jul 2014 12:41:47 +0200, a écrit : > On Sun, 2014-06-29 at 22:56 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Svante Signell, le Sun 29 Jun 2014 16:35:42 +0200, a écrit : > > > Looking at libsamplerate test problems, I found that clock(3) used > > > there is not relia

Re: clock(3) non-functional?

2014-07-01 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 14:04 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, le Tue 01 Jul 2014 12:41:47 +0200, a écrit : > > On Sun, 2014-06-29 at 22:56 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Svante Signell, le Sun 29 Jun 2014 16:35:42 +0200, a écrit : > > > > Looking at libsampler

Re: clock(3) non-functional?

2014-07-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Tue 01 Jul 2014 14:40:44 +0200, a écrit : > > > > $ ./test > > > > start = 3870 > > > > end = 3910 > > > > cpu_time_used = 0.40 > > > > > > I get: > > > gcc -g -Wall test_clock.c > > > ./a.out > > > start = 0 > > > end = 0 > > > cpu_time_used = 0.00 > > > > Well, yes, a

Re: clock(3) non-functional?

2014-07-01 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 14:47 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, le Tue 01 Jul 2014 14:40:44 +0200, a écrit : > > > > > $ ./test > > > > > start = 3870 > > > > > end = 3910 > > > > > cpu_time_used = 0.40 > > > > > > > > I get: > > > > gcc -g -Wall test_clock.c > > > > ./a.out > > >