On Sun, 2014-06-29 at 22:56 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Svante Signell, le Sun 29 Jun 2014 16:35:42 +0200, a écrit :
> > Looking at libsamplerate test problems, I found that clock(3) used
> > there is not reliable. Strange results are obtained on too Linux with a
> > simple test program.
>
> What do you mean by "strange"? The output I get
>
> $ ./test
> start = 3870
> end = 3910
> cpu_time_used = 0.000040
I get:
gcc -g -Wall test_clock.c
./a.out
start = 0
end = 0
cpu_time_used = 0.000000
ldd ./a.out
libc.so.0.3 => /lib/i386-gnu/libc.so.0.3 (0x0103f000)
/lib/ld.so => /lib/ld.so.1 (0x00001000)
libmachuser.so.1 => /lib/i386-gnu/libmachuser.so.1 (0x011ff000)
libhurduser.so.0.3 => /lib/i386-gnu/libhurduser.so.0.3
(0x01217000)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1404211307.31104.1.camel@PackardBell-PC
