libfuse_0.0.20120415-0~1_hurd-i386.changes ACCEPTED

2012-04-15 Thread Debian Ports Archive Maintainer
Maintainer: GNU Hurd Maintainers Uploader: Samuel Thibault Host: leda.debian.net Accepted: libfuse_0.0.20120415-0~1_hurd-i386.changes Files: libfuse_0.0.20120415-0~1.dsc libfuse_0.0.20120415.orig.tar.gz libfuse_0.0.20120415-0~1.debian.tar.gz libfuse-hurd-dev_0.0.20120415-0~1_hurd-i386.deb libfuse

hurd-specific packages

2012-04-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Among the things we'd like to do for the wheezy release, there are packaging incubator/hurdextra things. Some packages have already been uploaded on debian-ports, but we should push that to main. There is just one pending question: how should we package the sources? The source package na

Re: hurd-specific packages

2012-04-15 Thread Vasileios Karaklioumis
Foobar-hurd seems appropriate On Apr 15, 2012 5:46 PM, "Samuel Thibault" wrote: > > Hello, > > Among the things we'd like to do for the wheezy release, there are > packaging incubator/hurdextra things. Some packages have already been > uploaded on debian-ports, but we should push that to main. T

Re: hurd-specific packages

2012-04-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, le Sun 15 Apr 2012 16:46:22 +0200, a écrit : > Essentially, what I'm wondering is whether to use hurd-foobar or > foobar-hurd. The former makes it easy to get the list of hurdish > packages, just having a look at h/ in the archive. The latter makes it > easy to find the hurdish var

Re: hurd-specific packages

2012-04-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Vasileios Karaklioumis, le Sun 15 Apr 2012 18:28:40 +0300, a écrit : > Foobar-hurd seems tidier for me. Why? > I am searching for packages mostly based on name. That would work with hurd-foobar too. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "un

Re: hurd-specific packages

2012-04-15 Thread Vasileios Karaklioumis
I have no problem either way.Still building a real machine with hurd. On Apr 15, 2012 8:07 PM, "Samuel Thibault" wrote: > > Vasileios Karaklioumis, le Sun 15 Apr 2012 18:28:40 +0300, a écrit : > > Foobar-hurd seems tidier for me. > > Why? > > > I am searching for packages mostly based on name. >

Re: netdde_0.0.20120408-1_hurd-i386.changes REJECTED

2012-04-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 12 Apr 2012 11:42:06 +0200, a écrit : > > Did someone look if newer kernels applied any security updates to the > > drivers? > > Linux 2.6.29 does not have a stable branch upstream, so it most probably > misses such updates. Maybe we can give a try at 2.6.32, which is still

Re: netdde_0.0.20120408-1_hurd-i386.changes REJECTED

2012-04-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, le Mon 16 Apr 2012 00:25:13 +0200, a écrit : > So, would uploading 2.6.32.59 sources (latest from kernel.org) be OK? BTW, perhaps it would be preferred, even if it takes more room, to just put the vanilla Linux tarball in the netdde source package? Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em