Hello, Among the things we'd like to do for the wheezy release, there are packaging incubator/hurdextra things. Some packages have already been uploaded on debian-ports, but we should push that to main. There is just one pending question: how should we package the sources? The source package names might easily conflict with existing packages. For instance, libfuse-dev would conflict with the linux libfuse-dev, which is why I called it libfuse-hurd on debian-ports. I've called the source package libfuse, but probably it's be safer to call it libfuse-hurd, or perhaps hurd-libfuse, probably it's be safer to call it libfuse-hurd, or perhaps hurd-libfuse? The same happens with smbfs, which we might want to call hurd-smbfs or smbfs-hurd, etc.
Essentially, what I'm wondering is whether to use hurd-foobar or foobar-hurd. The former makes it easy to get the list of hurdish packages, just having a look at h/ in the archive. The latter makes it easy to find the hurdish variant of a debian package. I'd tend to prefer the former, what people think about it? Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120415144622.gm4...@type.famille.thibault.fr
