Re: Move package removals

2014-05-08 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Thu 08 May 2014 15:09:18 +0200, a écrit : > I think it's a little premature to remove them now, see for example > mupdf above. That's not a problem: at the very worse, buildds just rebuild the package again, and then it's installed. > I thought bug reports on packages counted a

Re: Move package removals

2014-05-08 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 03:09:18PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 13:58 +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 01:01:31AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 10:03:27PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > Here is another round of s

Re: Move package removals

2014-05-08 Thread Svante Signell
Hi Michael, On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 13:58 +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 01:01:31AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 10:03:27PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Here is another round of source packages which don't build any > > > more. Most o

Re: Move package removals

2014-05-08 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 01:01:31AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 10:03:27PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Here is another round of source packages which don't build any > > more. Most of them were missed before because of binNMU versions. Does > > anything there sho

Re: Move package removals

2014-05-06 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 01:01 +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 10:03:27PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Here is another round of source packages which don't build any > > more. Most of them were missed before because of binNMU versions. Does > > anything there should

Re: Move package removals

2014-05-05 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Michael Banck, le Tue 06 May 2014 01:01:31 +0200, a écrit : > wesnoth-1.11 I didn't notice it: that one should be building fine, it has just lagged because of the massive archive rebuild (and I make wesnoth-* built after everything else since it takes so long). > Gabriele suggested to als

Re: Move package removals

2014-05-05 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 10:03:27PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Here is another round of source packages which don't build any > more. Most of them were missed before because of binNMU versions. Does > anything there should really be kept installed? Quite a few of them are not leaf packag

Re: Move package removals

2014-05-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 01 May 2014 22:03:27 +0200, a écrit : > libzip Ah, sorry, not this one, it's just a buggy testcase. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian

Move package removals

2014-05-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Here is another round of source packages which don't build any more. Most of them were missed before because of binNMU versions. Does anything there should really be kept installed? Michael, could you perhaps handle submitting this removal to ftp-master? I'm not sure I understand what they