Hi Michael, On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 13:58 +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 01:01:31AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 10:03:27PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Here is another round of source packages which don't build any > > > more. Most of them were missed before because of binNMU versions. Does > > > anything there should really be kept installed? > > > > Quite a few of them are not leaf packages, AFAICT. If I check each with > > "dak rm --rdep-check --no-action -p -a=hurd-i386,all -B", I get the > > following list currently: > > > > burp > > dateutils > > ffe > > haskell-llvm > > libembperl-perl > > monit > > I removed monit. > > > mssh > > mupdf
This one is now built and installed! > > openocd > > resiprocate > > rpy2 > > since > > skimage > > tardy > > wesnoth-1.11 > > And wesnoth-1.11. > > > xburst-tools > > xserver-xorg-video-openchrome > > I also ignored xine-libs, which has come up since. > > A couple others showed up since as well, but they did look fine to > remove for me, I filed bug #747409 now. Didn't you see my mail? https://lists.debian.org/debian-hurd/2014/05/msg00036.html By commenting on the list I agreed to go through it too. I think it's a little premature to remove them now, see for example mupdf above. I thought bug reports on packages counted as excluded from the list. Are you in a hurry to get the percentage up? BR, Svante -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1399554558.13092.148.ca...@g3620.my.own.domain
