http://code.google.com/opensource/gsoc/2008/faqs.html#0.1_goals
CK Raju
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 7:20 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 02:46:21PM +0530, CK Raju wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Vikram Vincent
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > >
Scribit Praveen A dies 28/03/2008 hora 07:52:
> Can we go down to file based dependency instead on just package name,
> when the dependency is not satisfied?
Then you have exactly the same issue at the file level...
If libfoobar2 is named libbarfoo3 elsewhere, searching for libfoobar2.so
will not
2008/3/27, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 06:35:33PM +0530, AJISH B wrote:
> > Please find more details in the link below
> >
> > http://www.bddebian.com/~wiki/hurd/running/gnu/universal_package_manager/
>
>
> In the above link, you describe how to mix .deb, .rpm, b
2008/3/28, Hubert Chathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 02:50:38 +0100, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Can you cite any reference on that? I have a hard time believing
> > this... It just seems wrong that you would get paid by GSoC for
> > something that you have to do anyways as par
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 02:50:38 +0100, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi,
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 02:46:21PM +0530, CK Raju wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Vikram Vincent
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Do you mean that you are *also* submitting it as your college
>> > project or that UP
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 02:46:21PM +0530, CK Raju wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Vikram Vincent
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Do you mean that you are *also* submitting it as your college
> > project or that UPM is in the course syllabus?
> Yes, And I think Google SoC cites it
6 matches
Mail list logo
