On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:40:59AM +, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Kamaraju S Kusumanchi, le Mon 10 Mar 2008 20:09:10 -0400, a écrit :
> > I see. Would it be possible to schedule another glibc build? I am looking at
> > the build logs of texmacs package [3] and currently it does not build on
> > hu
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi, le Mon 10 Mar 2008 20:09:10 -0400, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > Kamaraju S Kusumanchi, le Mon 10 Mar 2008 16:52:02 -0400, a écrit :
> >> For a long time, I am seeing that the latest glibc 2.7-9 is not being
> >> built on hurd-i386 [1].
> >
> > Yes, it's just tha
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Kamaraju S Kusumanchi, le Mon 10 Mar 2008 16:52:02 -0400, a écrit :
>> For a long time, I am seeing that the latest glibc 2.7-9 is not being
>> built on hurd-i386 [1].
>
> Yes, it's just that it takes a long time to compile, which is better
> spent on other packages, so w
Hello,
I've attempted a gcc-4.3-build of glibc, available on
http://youpibouh.thefreecat.org/debian-hurd/glibc/
and it seems to work fine.
It also contains the DF fix, a liboil fix, and the use of
libpthread-stubs.
As upgrading from gcc-4.2 to gcc-4.3 is a non trivial change,
please people try t
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi, le Mon 10 Mar 2008 16:52:02 -0400, a écrit :
> For a long time, I am seeing that the latest glibc 2.7-9 is not being built
> on hurd-i386 [1].
Yes, it's just that it takes a long time to compile, which is better
spent on other packages, so we don't build all glibc versions,
For a long time, I am seeing that the latest glibc 2.7-9 is not being built
on hurd-i386 [1]. Clicking on the hurd-i386 link is not helpful either [2].
It just shows that there are 2045 in Dep-Wait, 1687 Needs-Build. Where to
even start to track down the problem? What is the status of glibc on hurd
6 matches
Mail list logo
