Re: Go teams stance on tag2upload

On 6/19/25 6:33 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: On 19.06.25 14:27, Pirate Praveen wrote: In general there are many conservatives in Debian who see Debian is perfect as is and any change is not required at all to any process or tools. So you think I am conservative? I am old enough to have

Re: Go teams stance on tag2upload

On 6/19/25 5:27 PM, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: how's the go teams stance on tag2upload? I don't see any advantage of tag2upload, so I won't use it. You are the FTP Master in Debian, right? Why do you not see any advantages? The system seems seriously flawed if FTP Master thinks it has no benef

Re: Using debian/vendor/ in Go packages?

On 4/5/25 4:31 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote: I can help with an example watch file, if you need to. pkg-js-tools actually automates adding new components. This could be extended to golang as well. https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/GroupSourcesTutorial#pkg-js-tools_way OpenPGP_0x8F53E0193B294B75

Re: Using debian/vendor/ in Go packages?

On 4/5/25 4:20 PM, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: Hi! Thanks all, I am having (slow) progress at https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/usql/-/merge_requests/1 with the tips. I think adding these to debian/vendor is not really a good idea, as it adds all these modules to debian.tar.gz rather th

Re: Using debian/vendor/ in Go packages?

On 4/3/25 2:07 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote: It's as simple as declaring in d/watch and d/copyright and then uscan/ gbp import-orig. Lacking a nicer way, I patched go.mod to append: +replace github.com/prep/socketpair => ./golang-github-prep-socketpair +replace gith

Re: Checking reverse dependencies

2024, ഡിസം 1 6:37:23 AM Otto Kekäläinen : > Hi! > > I am planning to upload new versions of some Go libraries, and before > doing it I wanted to test that the reverse dependencies don't break. > However, for these two I can't find any: > > # apt-cache rdepends golang-github-caarlos0-env > E: No pa

Re: golang-github-hhatto-gorst: autopkgtest failure

On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 00:07:51 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote: > The Ubuntu diff contains a patch that looks like a workaround (untested). This patch says data directory is reserved for golang autopkgtest in Ubuntu. Is this the same on debian too? If yes, that looks like a bad idea to me.

Status of golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-go-grpc-middleware

Hi zigo, I can see you have tagged a new version of golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-go-grpc-middleware in salsa, but it is not in the archive, did you forget to upload it? commit c59dc047bfb4e28f58d1bd7b4ded0ddbf7416cf2 (HEAD -> master, tag: debian/1.3.0-1, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Also th

Re: Plans for golang-goprotobuf to unstable?

On Mon, Nov 21 2022 at 07:33:58 AM +00:00:00 +00:00:00, Peymaneh wrote: An alternative that I consider is vendoring grpc/genproto apiv2 within golang-github-google-cel-spec-dev so that hopefully caddy can migrate to bookworm eventually... But that would not help other Go packages with the

Re: On license check in the light of the godiff issue.

On Sun, Aug 28 2022 at 10:07:27 PM +02:00:00 +02:00:00, Martin Dosch wrote: Hey Abraham, On 29.08.2022 01:05, Abraham Raji wrote: What can we possibly do to make the situation better? I am pretty new to debian packaging and I am by no means an expert in licensing issues, but from my und

Re: gitaly build failure at dh_golang stage

On Sun, Aug 14 2022 at 03:36:30 AM +08:00:00 +08:00:00, Shengjing Zhu wrote: On Sun, Aug 14, 2022 at 3:30 AM Pirate Praveen wrote: Hi, gitaly 15.2.2 is failing at dh_golang stage. gitaly 15.1.4 was built fine a few days back and I don't understand why this is failing

gitaly build failure at dh_golang stage

Hi, gitaly 15.2.2 is failing at dh_golang stage. gitaly 15.1.4 was built fine a few days back and I don't understand why this is failing here. dh_installdeb -O--buildsystem=golang -O--package=golang-gitlab-gitlab-org-gitaly-dev -O--builddirectory=_build dh_golang -O--buildsystem=golang

Re: Question about how to proceed with an update breaking another packages tests

On ചൊ, ജൂൺ 7 2022 at 01:02:12 രാവിലെ +08:00:00 +08:00:00, Shengjing Zhu wrote: I hope when you say "debian issue tracker", you mean bugs.debian.org, not salsa.debian.org. When BTS is still the official one, let's not try another tool. Yes, I meant bugs.debian.org only, since the original p

Re: Question about how to proceed with an update breaking another packages tests

On തി, ജൂൺ 6 2022 at 03:11:56 വൈകു +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Nilesh Patra wrote: The problem I am facing is: Updating go-crypto breaks go-pgpmail [5]. I created an issue upstream [6] and it seems that it's just an issue with it's tests. I read the github issue. It seems so. But I am not 10

Re: Question about how to proceed with an update breaking another packages tests

On തി, ജൂൺ 6 2022 at 06:57:51 വൈകു +02:00:00 +02:00:00, Martin Dosch wrote: On 06.06.2022 22:09, Pirate Praveen wrote: An issue is easier to track, a mail in the list may easily be forgotten. A mail in the list is good to get a quick feedback, but if we want to track things over long

Re: Question about how to proceed with an update breaking another packages tests

On തി, ജൂൺ 6 2022 at 11:48:31 രാവിലെ +02:00:00 +02:00:00, Martin Dosch wrote: On 06.06.2022 15:11, Nilesh Patra wrote: another thing that might be worth to consider: Should an issue regarding this topic be created for golang-github-emersion-go-pgpmail in the debian issue tracker? Yeah,

Re: Packaging feedback/review for LXD

2022, മേയ് 19 5:10:51 PM IST, Mathias Gibbens ൽ എഴുതി >On Thu, 2022-05-19 at 15:05 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> Hi Mathias, >> >> Thanks for packaging lxd. On a quick look the packaging seems fine. > > Thank you for taking a look! > >> >> When try

Re: Packaging feedback/review for LXD

Hi Mathias, Thanks for packaging lxd. On a quick look the packaging seems fine. When trying to install it, I got this error. Which package should ship these files? dpkg: error processing archive /home/pravi/forge/go-team/lxd-client_5.0.0-1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/shar

Planning to update golang-github-jackc-pgx to v4

Hi, I'm planning to update golang-github-jackc-pgx to 4.15. I don't see any reverse build dependencies so hopefully this is fine. Just asking here in case someone wants to keep the older version as separate binary package. Since the import path has changed I think the binary package will hav

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Next ts-jest depends on esbuild

[adding debian-go] On തി, ഡിസം 6 2021 at 09:08:57 രാവിലെ +0100 +0100, Yadd wrote: Hi all, next ts-jest depends on esbuild (Go and JS). Is there someone able to create this package? Else we will have to patch ts-jest to use rollup+terser or something else Cheers, Yadd https://github.com/e

Re: Plan for backporting golang to bullseye

On വെ, നവം 19 2021 at 10:13:06 വൈകു +0530 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: Hi, When trying to build gitaly for bullseye-fasttrack (similar to bullseye-backports but for packages that change too fast). # gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitaly/v14/proto/go/internal/cmd/protoc-gen-gitaly src/gitlab.com

Plan for backporting golang to bullseye

Hi, When trying to build gitaly for bullseye-fasttrack (similar to bullseye-backports but for packages that change too fast). # gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitaly/v14/proto/go/internal/cmd/protoc-gen-gitaly src/gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitaly/v14/proto/go/internal/cmd/protoc-gen-gitaly/main.go:75:15:

Re: How does the Debian build system avoid go.sum errors?

On 11 September 2021 8:36:50 pm IST, Sebastian wrote: >Dear Michael, > >> Aren't the relevant checks disabled when GO111MODULE is set to off, >> which dh-golang does? > >Thank you very much for your speedy response! With the information in >your email, I was able to find https://golang.org/ref/

Re: RFS: golang-github-saracen-walker/0.1.2-1 -- walker is a faster, parallel version, of filepath.Walk

On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 5:20 pm, Jai Flack wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for golang-github-saracen-walker: * Package name: golang-github-saracen-walker Version : 0.1.2-1 Upstream Author : Arran Walker * URL : https://github.com/saracen/walker * License

Re: golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-grpc-gateway and v2 - should I make a new binary or use experimental/transition?

On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 1:40 pm, Shengjing Zhu wrote: Hi, On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 1:38 AM Pirate Praveen wrote: Hi, I need github.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway/v2 for a dependency of gitlab (spamcheck) It has 3 reverse build dependencies. Should I do it as a normal transition

golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-grpc-gateway and v2 - should I make a new binary or use experimental/transition?

Hi, I need github.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway/v2 for a dependency of gitlab (spamcheck) It has 3 reverse build dependencies. Should I do it as a normal transition using same package names or create a new binary package? Thanks Praveen $ reverse-depends -b golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-g

Re: [request for review] golang-testify fixing #988101

On 2021, മേയ് 8 12:19:58 PM IST, Shengjing Zhu wrote: >On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 10:56:37AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: >> >> >> On 8 May 2021 9:58:49 am IST, Shengjing Zhu wrote: >> >On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 02:33:22AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I have pushed a fix for #9

Re: help with building gitaly with hardening enabled

On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 00:09, Shengjing Zhu wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 11:21 PM Pirate Praveen wrote: Hi go team, I am trying to update gitaly and pushed 13.4.6 version to salsa. But build is failing with this error go build runtime/cgo: invalid flag in go:cgo_ldflag: -Wl,-z

help with building gitaly with hardening enabled

Hi go team, I am trying to update gitaly and pushed 13.4.6 version to salsa. But build is failing with this error go build runtime/cgo: invalid flag in go:cgo_ldflag: -Wl,-z,now If I comment out 'export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all' line in rules, it is building fine. Tod be su

Bug#974862: ITP: golang-gocloud -- The Go Cloud Development Kit (Go CDK)

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-go@lists.debian.org * Package name : golang-gocloud Version : 0.20.0-1 Upstream Author : The Go Cloud Development Kit Authors * URL : https://github.com/google/go-cloud * License

Bug#974753: ITP: golang-honnef-go-tools -- Collection of golang tools and libraries

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-go@lists.debian.org * Package name : golang-honnef-go-tools Version : 2020.1-1 Upstream Author : Dominik Honnef * URL : https://github.com/dominikh/go-tools * License : Expand

Re: gitlab-shell buster-backports and golang 1.15

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 17:30, Shengjing Zhu wrote: On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 5:23 PM Pirate Praveen wrote: It's a go1.13 feature https://github.com/golang/go/commit/f5c43b919499899fe006896643bbfebbea9d1995 I tried building with newer golang-golang-x-net-dev as well as golang-any 1

gitlab-shell buster-backports and golang 1.15

Hi go team, Can someone try to build gitlab-shell buster-backports branch? it fails with # gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/client src/gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/client/gitlabnet.go:82:18: undefined: http.NewRequestWithContext I tried building with newer golang-golang-x-net-dev as

Re: RFS: golang-github-dkolbly-wl/0.0~git20180220.b06f57e-1 [ITP] -- Golang wayland protocol implementation. (library)

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 22:42, Arun Kumar Pariyar wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "golang-github-dkolbly-wl": Uploaded, thanks for your work.

Re: RFS: golang-github-kelvins-sunrisesunset/1.0-1 [ITP] -- Go package that provides the sunrise and sunset equation.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 22:35, Arun Kumar Pariyar wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "golang-github-kelvins-sunrisesunset": Uploaded, thanks for your work.

Re: RFS: golang-github-axgle-mahonia/0.0~git20180208.3358181-1 [ITP] -- Character-set conversion library implemented in Go.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 00:44, Arun Kumar Pariyar wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "golang-github-axgle-mahonia": Uploaded, thanks for your work.

Bug#963505: ITP: golang-github-otiai10-copy -- Golang copy directory recursively

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-go@lists.debian.org * Package name : golang-github-otiai10-copy Version : 1.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Hiromu OCHIAI * URL : https://github.com/otiai10/copy * License : Expat Programming

Re: RFS: aerc -- The world's best E-Mail client

On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 9:10 pm, Ben Fiedler wrote: Hi everyone, I'm looking for a sponsor for the aerc package [1]. Karthik, rovonovozoro and I packaged its dependencies last week, and we are finally ready to package aerc itself. This package is based on Karthik's previous work, albeit r

Re: RFS for golang-github-emersion-go-message

On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 7:17 am, su...@protonmail.com wrote: Hi Go Team, I have packaged golang-github-emersion-go-message , its a dependency of aerc mail client, with bug no (#958077) The repository is at https://salsa.debian.org/suman-guest/golang-github-emersion-go-message Please review

Re: Issue with creating package using using dh-make-golang from unknown git hosts

On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 12:11 pm, Karthik కార్తిక్ wrote: Hello everyone! I got this following error while creating package with dh-make-golang. Please help me how to fix it. See this pull request. https://github.com/Debian/dh-make-golang/pull/128 Team, can someone merge it? Are we stil

Re: RFS for golang-github-martinlindhe-base36

On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 9:55 am, su...@protonmail.com wrote: Hi Go Team, I have packaged golang-github-martinlindhe-base36 , its a dependency of aerc mail client, with bug no (#958079) The repository is at https://salsa.debian.org/suman-guest/golang-github-martinlindhe-base36 Please review

Re: RFS for golang-github-riywo-loginshell

On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 11:30 am, Karthik wrote: Hello Go Team! I have packaged a library named golang-github-riywo-loginshell It is a dependency of aerc mail client. (#956874) Repository: https://salsa.debian.org/karthik-guest/golang-github-riywo-loginshell Kindly review & upload. U

Bug#958033: ITP: golang-github-rubenv-sql-migrate -- SQL schema migration tool for Go

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-go@lists.debian.org * Package name : golang-github-rubenv-sql-migrate Version : 0.0~git20191213.0633851-1 Upstream Author : Ruben Vermeersch * URL : https://github.com/rubenv/sql-migrate

dh-make-golang and README in description

Hi, Do we realy need to copy the entire README as description with dh-make-golang? Most of the time it is just extra work removing the whole unnecessary part from description. Can we turn that off by default? Thanks Praveen

Re: RFS for golang-github-emersion-go-smtp

On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 2:13 pm, su...@protonmail.com wrote: Hi Go Team, I have packaged golang-github-emersion-go-smtp , its a dependency of aerc mail client, with bug no (#956883) The repository is at https://salsa.debian.org/suman-guest/golang-github-emersion-go-smtp Please review and u

Re: RFS for golang-github-emersion-go-sasl

On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:46 am, Karthik wrote: Hello Go Team! I have packaged a library named golang-github-emersion-go-sasl It is a dependency of aerc mail client. (#956874) Repository: https://salsa.debian.org/karthik-guest/golang-github-emersion-go-sasl Kindly review & upload. U

Re: RFS for golang-github-miolini-datacounter

On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 7:47 pm, Pirate Praveen wrote: On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 10:23 am, su...@protonmail.com wrote: Hi Go Team, I have packaged golang-github-miolini-datacounter , its a dependency of aerc mail client. (#956874) The repository is at https://salsa.debian.org/suman

Re: RFS for golang-github-kyoh86-xdg

On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 3:24 pm, Karthik కార్తిక్ wrote: Hello Go Team! I have packaged a library named golang-github-kyoh86-xdg It is a dependency of aerc mail client. (#956874) Repository: https://salsa.debian.org/karthik-guest/golang-github-kyoh86-xdg Kindly review & upload. I m

Bug#956906: ITP: golang-gopkg-gorp.v1 -- Go Relational Persistence - an ORM-ish library for Go

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-go@lists.debian.org * Package name : golang-gopkg-gorp.v1 Version : 1.7.2-1 Upstream Author : * URL : https://github.com/go-gorp/gorp * License : Expat Programming Lang: Go Description

Re: RFS for golang-github-miolini-datacounter

On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 10:23 am, su...@protonmail.com wrote: Hi Go Team, I have packaged golang-github-miolini-datacounter , its a dependency of aerc mail client. (#956874) The repository is at https://salsa.debian.org/suman-guest/golang-github-miolini-datacounter Please review and uploa

Re: Re: Plans for backporting golang 1.13 to buster

I think it makes sense to add Breaks: dh-golang << 1.43~ to golang-1.13 to force upgrade of dh-golang especially in backports. Else every package that uses golang-any >= 1.13~ will also need to add dh-golang >= 1.43~. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: gopasspw packaging (#901133)

On വെ, Jan 17, 2020 at 17:31, Balasankar Balu C wrote: Hi, On 17/1/20 3:14 PM, Clément Hermann wrote: In any case, it would be interesting to answer this question anyway: how do we make sure we don't have duplicate code in packages when we do this ? I think the plan is to have a `vau

Re: gopasspw packaging (#901133)

On വെ, Jan 17, 2020 at 14:43, Balasankar Balu C wrote: Hi, On 17/1/20 2:38 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: We discussed about packaging only part of bigger repos recently and agreed on packaging parts, just package vault-api and vault-sdk. That also works (Though I am not sure how that will

Re: gopasspw packaging (#901133)

On 2020, ജനുവരി 17 1:07:54 PM IST, "Balasankar "Balu" C" wrote: >Hi, > >On 30/3/19 8:01 PM, Balasankar C wrote: > >> Hi all, I am interested in packaging gopasspw[0], and have marked the >corresponding bug(#901133) to an ITP. >> I have written a few Go programs as hobby projects, but am new to

Re: Request to backport golang-defaults

On 2020, ജനുവരി 15 1:20:15 AM IST, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: >Hi all, > >There are some packages that need golang-any (>= 2:1.12~) which needs >to >be backported. >However, stable has 2:1.11~1. Therefore, could we upload 2:1.13 (which >is in testing) to buster-backports? That is already planned. I

Re: Plans for backporting golang 1.13 to buster

On ഞാ, Jan 5, 2020 at 21:55, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote: I've just uploaded golang 1.13 to bpo. After it gets ACCEPTED, dh-golang needs a backport, too. Also golang-defaults should be updated for backports. Thanks Tobias for the upload and it is already accepted. Btw these could have bee

Plans for backporting golang 1.13 to buster

Hi, I got this build error today with gitaly. https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitaly/issues/2312 I think more and more packages will be expecting golang 1.13 from now on. Is there any plan to backport golang 1.13 to buster? Or any objections if I were to backport it? Thanks Praveen

Approach to take when we need only a directory from a large repo

Hi, gitlab needs httputil from https://github.com/golang/gddo but as per current practice, we will have to package the whole gddo as a single package. I think this is unnecessary and just addes extra maintenance burden. This also means adding lots of build dependencies if we want to build an

Help with building protoc-gen-gitaly binary in golang-gitaly-proto package

Hi, I need to generate *pb.go files in go/gitalypb and it uses a binary in go/internal/cmd/protoc-gen-gitaly/ for the same. I could not find a way to build this binary using dh-golang. --no-source cannot be used as I need to install source I tried export DH_GOLANG_BUILDPKG := gitlab.com/git

Re: Revert some Go packages in unstable to align with testing/buster

On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 11:34 PM, Shengjing Zhu wrote: golang-gitaly-proto 0.123.0+dfsg-2 1.22.0+dfsg-1 team+pkg...@tracker.debian.org * gitlab-shell is omitted here, since it doesn't record the Built-Usin

Re: RFS: golang-github-fzambia-sentinel

On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 5:36 PM, Aman Verma wrote: Hi, I've prepared the Debian package of "golang-github-fzambia-sentinel". The package was tested on sbuild and was successfully built. It is also lintian-clean. I've uploaded the package to the salsa repo which may be found at: https:

Re: Winding down my Debian involvement

On 2019, മാർച്ച് 10 10:52:55 PM IST, Michael Stapelberg wrote: >Please see >https://michael.stapelberg.ch/posts/2019-03-10-debian-winding-down/ Thanks Michael for your contributions. I can relate with your concerns very well. After spending years trying to package gitlab, removing it from o

Re: RFS-golang-gitlab-lupine-go-mimedb

On ചൊ, ജനു 29, 2019 at 9:35 വൈകു, Anoop MS wrote: Hi, I've prepared the Debian package of the GitLab dependency go-mimedb. The package was tested on sbuild and was successfully built. It is lintian-clean and also tested with autopkgtest and it passed the tests. It is a dependency packag

Re: RFS: golang-github-sebtest-xff

On 1/1/19 7:59 PM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hi, > > I've prepared the Debian package of "*golang-github-sebtest-xff*". The > package was > tested on sbuild and was successfully built. I've > uploaded the package to the salsa repo which may be found at: > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/go

Re: Code review, golang-github-danverbraganza-varcaser

> Please review, golang-github-danverbraganza-varcaser Seems good, can you change 'sid' to 'unstable' in changelog? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: golang-github-certifi-gocertifi

On 1/1/19 5:31 AM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Is there no other need of this package? > Moreover, this package is useful for systems that do not have CA bundles > that Golang can find itself. We are packaging it for Debian and it already has CA bundles. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital si

Re: RFS: golang-github-fzambia-sentinel

On 12/28/18 6:07 PM, Aman Verma wrote: > Hi, >     I've prepared the Debian package of > "*golang-github-fzambia-sentinel*". The package was tested on sbuild and > was successfully built. It is also lintian-clean. I've uploaded the > package to the salsa repo which may be found at: > https://salsa.

Re: RFS: golang-github-h2non-go-is-svg

On 12/28/18 5:24 PM, Aman Verma wrote: > Hi, >     I've prepared the Debian package of > "*golang-github-h2non-go-is-svg*". The package was tested on sbuild and > was successfully built. It is also lintian-clean. I've uploaded the > package to the salsa repo which may be found at: > https://salsa.d

Re: RFS: golang-github-certifi-gocertifi

On 12/27/18 10:26 PM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hi, > > I've prepared the Debian package of "*golang-github-certifi-gocertifi*". The > package was > tested on sbuild and was successfully built. It is also lintian-clean. I've > uploaded the package to the salsa repo which may be found at: > https:/

Re: RFS: golang-github-jfbus-httprs

On 12/27/18 8:39 PM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hi, > > I've prepared the Debian package of "*golang-github-jfbus-httprs*". The > package was > tested on sbuild and was successfully built. It is also lintian-clean. I've > uploaded the package to the salsa repo which may be found at: > https://salsa.d

Re: Binary error while packaging

On 2018, ഡിസംബർ 24 2:38:24 AM IST, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: >On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 12:30 AM Michael Stapelberg > >wrote: > >> Ah. The -dev packages are meant to include only source code, so they >are >> architecture-independent (= they work on, say, i386 and amd64 >computers). >> >> Your binarie

Bug#916742: ITP: golang-github-namsral-flag -- Parse flags, environment variables and config files

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-go@lists.debian.org * Package name: golang-github-namsral-flag Version : 1.7.4~alpha+git20170814.67f268f-1 Upstream Author : Lars Wiegman * URL : https

Re: golang-gitaly-proto 0.123.0 failing to build from source - help needed

This is now tracked upstream at https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitaly/issues/1427 -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

golang-gitaly-proto 0.123.0 failing to build from source - help needed

Hi, golang-gitaly-proto was building fine till 0.118.1. But when trying to update to 0.123.0, I'm not able to build it any more. I can see the location of generated files have changed, but dh-make-golang seems to be not able to find the new location. Any ideas to fix this? Thanks Praveen Buil

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#893171: build failure when updating golang-google-grpc to 1.11

On 2018, ഒക്‌ടോബർ 19 9:59:44 PM IST, Shengjing Zhu wrote: >On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 6:39 PM Pirate Praveen > wrote: >> >> Hi Go team, >> >> Can someone help with this package? >> > >I've fixed it in git. > >I'm leaving my laptop to te

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#893171: build failure when updating golang-google-grpc to 1.11

Hi Go team, Can someone help with this package? Thanks Praveen On 12/05/18 7:39 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > I get the following error in sbuild. Can someone help? A newer grpc is > required for golang-gitaly-proto. > > debian/rules build > dh build --buildsystem=golan