Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: normal
Hello,
I'm sending this bug report from my server, 'cause on my firewall
I can not install reportbug, because of the hosed libc install.
I just tried to do a apt-get dist-upgrade to the latest Sarge, and
somehow the libc went wrong (i don't h
[On 17 Nov, @23:19, Daniel wrote in "Re: Bug#221360: upgrade of lib ..."]
> Save them to another directory and reinstall libc6, and you should be
> fine. And the /lib/tls dir has nothing to do with the problem.
your absolutly right :-) apt-get -u upgrade went ok now.
Strange, strange. I just wis
[On 17 Nov, @23:19, Daniel wrote in "Re: Bug#221360: upgrade of lib ..."]
> What are those libraries? Are they symlinks, old versions, whatever -
forgot to add:
libc.so.6
libdl.so.2
libm.so.6
libpthread.so.0
librt.so.1
DUH, i see it now /usr/lib vs /lib Ok I need new classes...
ok, now I
[On 17 Nov, @23:19, Daniel wrote in "Re: Bug#221360: upgrade of lib ..."]
> > And I have no glue what to do next. I've copied the /lib/tls directory over from
> > my server, but I'm hesitating to delete the libraries in question.
>
> What are those libraries? Are they symlinks, old versions, what
[On 17 Nov, @23:46, Daniel wrote in "Re: Bug#221360: upgrade of lib ..."]
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] dpkg -S /usr/lib/libc-2.3.2.so
> > dpkg: /usr/lib/libc-2.3.2.so not found.
> >
> > strange indeed
>
> No idea what might have happened on Sep 12th to create that binary?
i'm really guessing here,
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: important
Hello,
I'm seeing some very strange on my firewall (and only there). I'm
running testing/unstable there. When I tried to compile the kernel
this morning I got:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] make
HOSTCC scri
[On 18 Dec, @23:08, Daniel wrote in "Re: Bug#224419: /lib/libc.so.6 ..."]
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 09:06:23PM +0100, Miek Gieben wrote:
> > Package: libc6
> > Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm s
Hello,
well, I really don't know it sometimes did work, but i'm getting
the same error again.
Here is trace of it:
(Below is a trace with the LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/lib, which solved it)
strace gcc -g -O2 -o nsd answer.o axfr.o dbaccess.o dname.o namedb.o nsd.o
plugins.o query.o \
rbtree.o region-al
[On 08 Jan, @15:07, Daniel wrote in "Re: still seeing it ..."]
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:16:24PM +0100, Miek Gieben wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > well, I really don't know it sometimes did work, but i'm getting
> > the same error again.
> >
>
[On 08 Jan, @16:01, Daniel wrote in "Re: still seeing it ..."]
> >
> > attached is foo.map of a failed compilation/linker
>
> The map doesn't show which linker it was but...
>
> > > Does objdump -T /lib/ld-linux.so.2 | grep dl_tls_symaddr show
> > > anything?
> >
> > # locate ld-linux.so
> > /
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: normal
Hello,
I'm sending this bug report from my server, 'cause on my firewall
I can not install reportbug, because of the hosed libc install.
I just tried to do a apt-get dist-upgrade to the latest Sarge, and
somehow the libc went wrong (i don't h
[On 17 Nov, @23:19, Daniel wrote in "Re: Bug#221360: upgrade of lib ..."]
> Save them to another directory and reinstall libc6, and you should be
> fine. And the /lib/tls dir has nothing to do with the problem.
your absolutly right :-) apt-get -u upgrade went ok now.
Strange, strange. I just wis
[On 17 Nov, @23:19, Daniel wrote in "Re: Bug#221360: upgrade of lib ..."]
> What are those libraries? Are they symlinks, old versions, whatever -
forgot to add:
libc.so.6
libdl.so.2
libm.so.6
libpthread.so.0
librt.so.1
DUH, i see it now /usr/lib vs /lib Ok I need new classes...
ok, now I
[On 17 Nov, @23:19, Daniel wrote in "Re: Bug#221360: upgrade of lib ..."]
> > And I have no glue what to do next. I've copied the /lib/tls directory over
> > from
> > my server, but I'm hesitating to delete the libraries in question.
>
> What are those libraries? Are they symlinks, old versions,
[On 17 Nov, @23:46, Daniel wrote in "Re: Bug#221360: upgrade of lib ..."]
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] dpkg -S /usr/lib/libc-2.3.2.so
> > dpkg: /usr/lib/libc-2.3.2.so not found.
> >
> > strange indeed
>
> No idea what might have happened on Sep 12th to create that binary?
i'm really guessing here,
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: important
Hello,
I'm seeing some very strange on my firewall (and only there). I'm
running testing/unstable there. When I tried to compile the kernel
this morning I got:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] make
HOSTCC scri
[On 18 Dec, @23:08, Daniel wrote in "Re: Bug#224419: /lib/libc.so.6 ..."]
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 09:06:23PM +0100, Miek Gieben wrote:
> > Package: libc6
> > Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm s
Hello,
well, I really don't know it sometimes did work, but i'm getting
the same error again.
Here is trace of it:
(Below is a trace with the LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/lib, which solved it)
strace gcc -g -O2 -o nsd answer.o axfr.o dbaccess.o dname.o namedb.o nsd.o
plugins.o query.o \
rbtree.o region-al
[On 08 Jan, @15:07, Daniel wrote in "Re: still seeing it ..."]
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:16:24PM +0100, Miek Gieben wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > well, I really don't know it sometimes did work, but i'm getting
> > the same error again.
> >
>
[On 08 Jan, @16:01, Daniel wrote in "Re: still seeing it ..."]
> >
> > attached is foo.map of a failed compilation/linker
>
> The map doesn't show which linker it was but...
>
> > > Does objdump -T /lib/ld-linux.so.2 | grep dl_tls_symaddr show
> > > anything?
> >
> > # locate ld-linux.so
> > /
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-18
Severity: normal
Hello,
When I upgrade the libc package on my firewall it complains about old
libs in /usr/lib and refuses to upgrade.
The libs it complains about are:
libdl.so.2
libm.so.6
libpthread.so.0
librt.so.1
Removing those symlinks makes the libc pac
21 matches
Mail list logo
